» Articles » PMID: 32128451

Indicators of Retention in Remote Digital Health Studies: a Cross-study Evaluation of 100,000 Participants

Abstract

Digital technologies such as smartphones are transforming the way scientists conduct biomedical research. Several remotely conducted studies have recruited thousands of participants over a span of a few months allowing researchers to collect real-world data at scale and at a fraction of the cost of traditional research. Unfortunately, remote studies have been hampered by substantial participant attrition, calling into question the representativeness of the collected data including generalizability of outcomes. We report the findings regarding recruitment and retention from eight remote digital health studies conducted between 2014-2019 that provided individual-level study-app usage data from more than 100,000 participants completing nearly 3.5 million remote health evaluations over cumulative participation of 850,000 days. Median participant retention across eight studies varied widely from 2-26 days (median across all studies = 5.5 days). Survival analysis revealed several factors significantly associated with increase in participant retention time, including (i) referral by a clinician to the study (increase of 40 days in median retention time); (ii) compensation for participation (increase of 22 days, 1 study); (iii) having the clinical condition of interest in the study (increase of 7 days compared with controls); and (iv) older age (increase of 4 days). Additionally, four distinct patterns of daily app usage behavior were identified by unsupervised clustering, which were also associated with participant demographics. Most studies were not able to recruit a sample that was representative of the race/ethnicity or geographical diversity of the US. Together these findings can help inform recruitment and retention strategies to enable equitable participation of populations in future digital health research.

Citing Articles

Quantifying arm swing in Parkinson's disease: a method accounting for arm activities during free-living gait.

Post E, Laarhoven T, Raykov Y, Little M, Nonnekes J, Heskes T J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025; 22(1):37.

PMID: 40011957 PMC: 11863854. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-025-01578-z.


Perspectives of Hispanic and Latinx Community Members on AI-Enabled mHealth Tools: Qualitative Focus Group Study.

Kraft S, Chopra S, Duran M, Rojina J, Beretta A, Lopez K J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e59817.

PMID: 39912577 PMC: 11843051. DOI: 10.2196/59817.


Collecting Real-World Data via an In-Home Smart Medication Dispenser: Longitudinal Observational Study of Survey Panel Persistency, Response Rates, and Psychometric Properties.

Ogorek B, Rhoads T, Smith E JMIR Hum Factors. 2025; 12:e60438.

PMID: 39899755 PMC: 11809940. DOI: 10.2196/60438.


Health behaviours and mobile intervention use in patients recruited from general practitioners' practices in rural Bavaria.

Konig L, Betz C, Al Masri M, Bartelmess T Health Psychol Behav Med. 2025; 13(1):2444244.

PMID: 39777054 PMC: 11703449. DOI: 10.1080/21642850.2024.2444244.


Utilization, Satisfaction, and Clinical Outcomes of People of Color and White Adults Using an Employer-Sponsored Digital Mental Health Platform.

Sagui Henson S, Welcome Chamberlain C, Smith B, Jackson J, Adusei S, Castro Sweet C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025; 21(12).

PMID: 39767499 PMC: 11675968. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21121660.


References
1.
Hershman S, Bot B, Shcherbina A, Doerr M, Moayedi Y, Pavlovic A . Physical activity, sleep and cardiovascular health data for 50,000 individuals from the MyHeart Counts Study. Sci Data. 2019; 6(1):24. PMC: 6472350. DOI: 10.1038/s41597-019-0016-7. View

2.
Pratap A, Allred R, Duffy J, Rivera D, Lee H, Renn B . Contemporary Views of Research Participant Willingness to Participate and Share Digital Data in Biomedical Research. JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2(11):e1915717. PMC: 6902809. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.15717. View

3.
Dainesi S, Goldbaum M . Reasons behind the participation in biomedical research: a brief review. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2014; 17(4):842-51. DOI: 10.1590/1809-4503201400040004. View

4.
Pagoto S, Bennett G . How behavioral science can advance digital health. Transl Behav Med. 2013; 3(3):271-6. PMC: 3771019. DOI: 10.1007/s13142-013-0234-z. View

5.
Anguera J, Jordan J, Castaneda D, Gazzaley A, Arean P . Conducting a fully mobile and randomised clinical trial for depression: access, engagement and expense. BMJ Innov. 2016; 2(1):14-21. PMC: 4789688. DOI: 10.1136/bmjinnov-2015-000098. View