» Articles » PMID: 32109358

Assessing the Impacts of Cu(OH) Nanopesticide and Ionic Copper on the Soil Enzyme Activity and Bacterial Community

Overview
Date 2020 Feb 29
PMID 32109358
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Nanopesticides are being introduced in agriculture, and the associated environmental risks and benefits must be carefully assessed before their widespread agricultural applications. We investigated the impacts of a commercial Cu(OH) nanopesticide formulation (NPF) at different agricultural application doses (e.g., 0.5, 5, and 50 mg of Cu kg) on enzyme activities and bacterial communities of loamy soil (organic matter content of 3.61%) over 21 days. Results were compared to its ionic analogue (i.e., CuSO) and nano-Cu(OH), including both the commercial unformulated active ingredient of NPF (AI-NPF) and synthesized Cu(OH) nanorods (NR). There were negligible changes in the activity of acid phosphatase, regardless of exposure dose, whereas significant ( < 0.05) variations in activities of invertase, urease, and catalase were observed at a dose of 5 mg kg or higher. Invertase activity decreased with an increasing bioavailable Cu concentration in soil under various treatments. In comparison to CuSO, both Cu(OH) nanopesticide (i.e., NPF) and nano-Cu(OH) (i.e., AI-NPF and NR) caused a significant ( < 0.05) inhibition of urease activity, wherein a significant ( < 0.05) increase in the activity of catalase was observed, representing serious oxidative stress. Accordingly, NPF, AI-NPF, and NR differently affected soil bacterial abundance, diversity, and community compared to CuSO, which could have resulted from the changes in the bioavailable Cu concentration as a result of the distinct nature of copper spiked (i.e., nano form versus salt). Moreover, minor differences in the soil enzyme activity and bacterial community were observed between NPF and AI-NPF, reflecting that the impact of the Cu(OH) nanopesticide was primarily attributed to the presence of nano-Cu(OH). In total, the impacts of nano-Cu(OH) on the soil bacterial community and enzyme activity tested in this study differed from CuSO, shedding light on the environmental risks of the Cu(OH) nanopesticide in the long run.

Citing Articles

Recent advances in stimuli-response mechanisms of nano-enabled controlled-release fertilizers and pesticides.

Shen M, Liu S, Jiang C, Zhang T, Chen W Eco Environ Health. 2023; 2(3):161-175.

PMID: 38074996 PMC: 10702921. DOI: 10.1016/j.eehl.2023.07.005.


Response of microbial communities in the phyllosphere ecosystem of tobacco exposed to the broad-spectrum copper hydroxide.

Feng R, Wang H, Liu T, Wang F, Cai L, Chen X Front Microbiol. 2023; 14:1229294.

PMID: 37840714 PMC: 10568630. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1229294.


Polystyrene microplastics protect lettuce () from the hazardous effects of Cu(OH) nanopesticides.

Yan G, Sun Y, Yang L, Zhang Y, Zhang W Front Plant Sci. 2022; 13:1087754.

PMID: 36570908 PMC: 9772688. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1087754.


Aggregation, Sedimentation and Dissolution of Cu(OH)-Nanorods-Based Nanopesticide in Soil Solutions.

Xu Z, Tang Q, Hong A, Li L Nanomaterials (Basel). 2022; 12(21).

PMID: 36364621 PMC: 9657550. DOI: 10.3390/nano12213844.


Nano-Enable Materials Promoting Sustainability and Resilience in Modern Agriculture.

Rahim H, Qaswar M, Uddin M, Giannini C, Herrera M, Rea G Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021; 11(8).

PMID: 34443899 PMC: 8398611. DOI: 10.3390/nano11082068.