Validation of PCR-based Protocols for the Detection of DNA in the Final Host Using the Intestinal Scraping Technique As a Reference

Overview

Journal Food Waterborne Parasitol

Date 2020 Feb 26

PMID 32095616

Citations 5

Authors

P Maksimov

M Isaksson

G Schares

T Romig

F J Conraths

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Oral uptake of infectious eggs shed by canids with their faeces may lead to development of alveolar echinococcosis in humans, which is clinically similar to a malignant infiltrative tumor and may be fatal if left untreated. is therefore regarded as one of the most important and neglected metazoan parasites in the Northern hemisphere. The diagnosis of this tapeworm in the final host plays a key role in the epidemiology of . The diagnostic performance of a magnetic-capture (MC) DNA extraction protocol in combination with a minor groove-binder real time PCR (MC-MGBqPCR) for the detection of eggs was determined relative to a highly sensitive variant of the Intestinal Scraping Technique (IST) using faecal samples of foxes. In addition, we compared results obtained by MC-MGBqPCR with those of a previously validated protocol (QIAamp Fast DNA Stool Mini Kit (QT) combined with a TaqMan qPCR). Furthermore, a workflow using the NucleoMagVet DNA extraction kit (NM) in combination with MGBqPCR and TaqMan-qPCR was also included in the comparisons. To estimate the analytical sensitivity, phosphate-buffered saline and fox faecal samples were spiked with different numbers of eggs and tested in defined combinations of DNA extraction and PCR protocols. To assess the diagnostic sensitivity of the different workflows, samples were used that had been collected from the ampulla recti or the rectum of 120 foxes hunted in Brandenburg, Germany. The samples represented five IST categories formed according to the worm burden of the foxes. For DNA extraction by MC or using two other commercial extraction kits, the supernatants obtained from 3 g of bead-beaten faecal samples were used. The extracted DNAs were then processed in the respective PCR protocols. The MC-MGBqPCR showed the highest diagnostic sensitivity (93%; 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 86-97%) relative to IST. The QT extraction protocol in combination with TaqMan-qPCR had the second highest sensitivity (89%; 95% CI: 80-94%), followed by NM with MGBqPCR (86%; 95% CI: 77-93%) in comparison to IST. The lowest diagnostic sensitivity was found for the NM combined with the TaqMan-qPCR protocol (72%; 95% CI: 62-82%). In conclusion, the MC-MGBqPCR seems to represent a suitable alternative to IST. However, applied to 3 g faecal samples, the less costly QT-TaqMan-qPCR workflow yielded a similar diagnostic sensitivity relative to IST. However, differences between these two workflows were not statistically significant.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and geographic distribution of Echinococcus genus in wild canids in southern Québec, Canada.

Lavallee-Bourget E, Fernandez-Prada C, Masse A, Turgeon P, Arsenault J PLoS One. 2024; 19(7):e0306600.

PMID: 39008475 PMC: 11249250. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306600.

A framework for the design, implementation, and evaluation of output-based surveillance systems against zoonotic threats.

Rivers S, Kochanowski M, Stolarek A, Zietek-Barszcz A, Horigan V, Kent A Front Public Health. 2023; 11:1129776.

PMID: 37151595 PMC: 10157289. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1129776.

Species Detection within the Complex by Novel Probe-Based Real-Time PCRs.

Maksimov P, Bergmann H, Wassermann M, Romig T, Gottstein B, Casulli A Pathogens. 2020; 9(10).

PMID: 32993077 PMC: 7599986. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9100791.

Editorial overview: From farms and forests to forks? A review of diagnosis and management of globally important zoonotic spp. cestodes.

Frey C, Jenkins E, Lundstrom-Stadelmann B Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2020; 16:e00061.

PMID: 32095631 PMC: 7034014. DOI: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2019.e00061.

A novel protocol to isolate, detect and differentiate taeniid eggs in leafy greens and berries using real-time PCR with melting curve analysis.

Frey C, Oakley J, Lobanov V, Marreros N, Schurer J, Lalonde L Parasit Vectors. 2019; 12(1):590.

PMID: 31849342 PMC: 6918723. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3834-8.

References

Torgerson P, Deplazes P . Echinococcosis: diagnosis and diagnostic interpretation in population studies. Trends Parasitol. 2009; 25(4):164-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2008.12.008. View

Knapp J, Millon L, Mouzon L, Umhang G, Raoul F, Ali Z . Real time PCR to detect the environmental faecal contamination by Echinococcus multilocularis from red fox stools. Vet Parasitol. 2014; 201(1-2):40-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.12.023. View

Maksimov P, Schares G, Press S, Frohlich A, Basso W, Herzig M . Comparison of different commercial DNA extraction kits and PCR protocols for the detection of Echinococcus multilocularis eggs in faecal samples from foxes. Vet Parasitol. 2017; 237:83-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.02.015. View

Umhang G, Woronoff-Rhen N, Combes B, Boue F . Segmental sedimentation and counting technique (SSCT): an adaptable method for qualitative diagnosis of Echinococcus multilocularis in fox intestines. Exp Parasitol. 2011; 128(1):57-60. DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2011.01.004. View

Tackmann K, Mattis R, Conraths F . Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in foxes: evaluation of a protocol of the intestinal scraping technique. J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2006; 53(8):395-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0450.2006.01003.x. View

Maas M, van Roon A, Dam-Deisz C, Opsteegh M, Massolo A, Deksne G . Evaluation by latent class analysis of a magnetic capture based DNA extraction followed by real-time qPCR as a new diagnostic method for detection of Echinococcus multilocularis in definitive hosts. Vet Parasitol. 2016; 230:20-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.10.016. View

Gottstein B, Wang J, Boubaker G, Marinova I, Spiliotis M, Muller N . Susceptibility versus resistance in alveolar echinococcosis (larval infection with Echinococcus multilocularis). Vet Parasitol. 2015; 213(3-4):103-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.07.029. View

Kapel C, Torgerson P, Thompson R, Deplazes P . Reproductive potential of Echinococcus multilocularis in experimentally infected foxes, dogs, raccoon dogs and cats. Int J Parasitol. 2005; 36(1):79-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.08.012. View

Caraguel C, Stryhn H, Gagne N, Dohoo I, Hammell K . Selection of a cutoff value for real-time polymerase chain reaction results to fit a diagnostic purpose: analytical and epidemiologic approaches. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2011; 23(1):2-15. DOI: 10.1177/104063871102300102. View

10.

Woolsey I, Jensen P, Deplazes P, Kapel C . Establishment and development of Echinococcus multilocularis metacestodes in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) after oral inoculation with parasite eggs. Parasitol Int. 2015; 64(6):571-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2015.08.006. View

11.

Schweiger A, Ammann R, Candinas D, Clavien P, Eckert J, Gottstein B . Human alveolar echinococcosis after fox population increase, Switzerland. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007; 13(6):878-82. PMC: 2792858. DOI: 10.3201/eid1306.061074. View

12.

Wahlstrom H, Comin A, Isaksson M, Deplazes P . Detection of Echinococcus multilocularis by MC-PCR: evaluation of diagnostic sensitivity and specificity without gold standard. Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2016; 6:30173. PMC: 4788769. DOI: 10.3402/iee.v6.30173. View

13.

Conraths F, Deplazes P . Echinococcus multilocularis: Epidemiology, surveillance and state-of-the-art diagnostics from a veterinary public health perspective. Vet Parasitol. 2015; 213(3-4):149-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2015.07.027. View

14.

Isaksson M, Hagstrom A, Armua-Fernandez M, Wahlstrom H, Agren E, Miller A . A semi-automated magnetic capture probe based DNA extraction and real-time PCR method applied in the Swedish surveillance of Echinococcus multilocularis in red fox (Vulpes vulpes) faecal samples. Parasit Vectors. 2014; 7:583. PMC: 4282741. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-014-0583-6. View

15.

Liccioli S, Catalano S, Kutz S, Lejeune M, Verocai G, Duignan P . Sensitivity of double centrifugation sugar fecal flotation for detecting intestinal helminths in coyotes (Canis latrans). J Wildl Dis. 2012; 48(3):717-23. DOI: 10.7589/0090-3558-48.3.717. View

16.

Opel K, Chung D, McCord B . A study of PCR inhibition mechanisms using real time PCR. J Forensic Sci. 2009; 55(1):25-33. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2009.01245.x. View

17.

Eckert J, Conraths F, Tackmann K . Echinococcosis: an emerging or re-emerging zoonosis?. Int J Parasitol. 2000; 30(12-13):1283-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00130-2. View

18.

Kutyavin I, Afonina I, Mills A, Gorn V, Lukhtanov E, Belousov E . 3'-minor groove binder-DNA probes increase sequence specificity at PCR extension temperatures. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999; 28(2):655-61. PMC: 102528. DOI: 10.1093/nar/28.2.655. View

19.

Staubach C, Hoffmann L, Schmid V, Ziller M, Tackmann K, Conraths F . Bayesian space-time analysis of Echinococcus multilocularis-infections in foxes. Vet Parasitol. 2011; 179(1-3):77-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.01.065. View

20.

Tackmann K, Loschner U, Mix H, Staubach C, Thulke H, Ziller M . A field study to control Echinococcus multilocularis-infections of the red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in an endemic focus. Epidemiol Infect. 2002; 127(3):577-87. PMC: 2869785. DOI: 10.1017/s0950268801006112. View