Biomechanical Comparison of Pedicle Screw Fixation Strength in Synthetic Bones: Effects of Screw Shape, Core/thread Profile and Cement Augmentation

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2020 Feb 22

PMID 32084219

Citations 21

Authors

Mu-Yi Liu

Tsung-Ting Tsai

Po-Liang Lai

Ming-Kai Hsieh

Lih-Huei Chen

Ching-Lung Tai

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Pedicle screw loosening resulting from insufficient bone-screw interfacial holding power is not uncommon. The screw shape and thread profile are considered important factors of the screw fixation strength. This work investigated the difference in pullout strength between conical and cylindrical screws with three different thread designs. The effects of the thread profiles on the screw fixation strength of cannulated screws with or without cement augmentation in osteoporotic bone were also evaluated. Commercially available artificial standard L4 vertebrae and low-density polyurethane foam blocks were used as substitutes for healthy vertebrae and osteoporotic bones, respectively. The screw pullout strengths of nine screw systems were investigated (six in each). These systems included the combination of three different screw shapes (solid/cylindrical, solid/conical and cannulated/cylindrical) with three different thread profiles (fine-thread, coarse-thread and dual-core/dual-thread). Solid screws were designed for the cementless screw fixation of vertebrae using the standard samples, whereas cannulated screws were designed for the cemented screw fixation of osteoporotic bone using low-density test blocks. Following specimen preparation, a screw pullout test was conducted using a material test machine, and the maximal screw pullout strength was compared among the groups. This study demonstrated that, in healthy vertebrae, both the conical and dual-core/dual-thread designs can improve pullout strength. A combination of the conical and dual-core/dual-thread designs may achieve optimal postoperative screw stability. However, in osteoporotic bone, the thread profile have little impact on the screw fixation strength when pedicle screws are fixed with cement augmentation. Cement augmentation is the most important factor contributing to screw pullout fixation strength as compared to screw designs.

Citing Articles

Biomechanical insights into anterolateral vertebral screw fixation in osteoporotic spines: a comparative study of fixation methods and positions using porcine vertebrae.

Hsieh M, Li Y, Chen W, Lee D, Tai C J Orthop Surg Res. 2025; 20(1):31.

PMID: 39794854 PMC: 11724585. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-025-05452-5.

Impact of screw tip design on screw anchorage: mechanical testing and numerical simulation.

Xie S, Cui L, Liu J, Qing P, Li J J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):447.

PMID: 39080768 PMC: 11287948. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-04841-6.

Thermographic analysis of perforations in polyurethane blocks performed with experimental conical drill bit in comparison to conventional orthopedic drill bit: a preliminary study.

Rovaris I, de Carvalho A, Silva G, Gerardi D, Alievi M BMC Res Notes. 2024; 17(1):197.

PMID: 39020384 PMC: 11256403. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-024-06862-0.

Sensorless Based Haptic Feedback Integration In Robot-assisted Pedicle Screw Insertion For Lumbar Spine Surgery: A preliminary cadaveric study.

Nakdhamabhorn S, M Pillai B, Chotivichit A, Suthakorn J Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2024; 24:420-433.

PMID: 38841212 PMC: 11152607. DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2024.05.022.

Biomechanical Analysis of Trapezoidal Thread Screw-Rod Fixation in Pedicle Section of Cervical Spine: A Finite-Element Analysis.

Kumar R, Kumar A, Kumari S, Kumar A Indian J Orthop. 2024; 58(6):771-777.

PMID: 38812871 PMC: 11130091. DOI: 10.1007/s43465-024-01170-y.

References

Galbusera F, Volkheimer D, Reitmaier S, Berger-Roscher N, Kienle A, Wilke H . Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication?. Eur Spine J. 2015; 24(5):1005-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-015-3768-6. View

Patel P, E T Shepherd D, Hukins D . Compressive properties of commercially available polyurethane foams as mechanical models for osteoporotic human cancellous bone. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2008; 9:137. PMC: 2575212. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-9-137. View

Nakashima H, Yukawa Y, Imagama S, Kanemura T, Kamiya M, Yanase M . Complications of cervical pedicle screw fixation for nontraumatic lesions: a multicenter study of 84 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 16(3):238-47. DOI: 10.3171/2011.11.SPINE11102. View

Dickman C, Fessler R, MacMillan M, Haid R . Transpedicular screw-rod fixation of the lumbar spine: operative technique and outcome in 104 cases. J Neurosurg. 1992; 77(6):860-70. DOI: 10.3171/jns.1992.77.6.0860. View

Chen L, Tai C, Lai P, Lee D, Tsai T, Fu T . Pullout strength for cannulated pedicle screws with bone cement augmentation in severely osteoporotic bone: influences of radial hole and pilot hole tapping. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2009; 24(8):613-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.05.002. View

Ramaswamy R, Evans S, Kosashvili Y . Holding power of variable pitch screws in osteoporotic, osteopenic and normal bone: are all screws created equal?. Injury. 2009; 41(2):179-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2009.08.015. View

Goost H, Deborre C, Wirtz D, Burger C, Prescher A, Folsch C . PMMA-augmentation of incompletely cannulated pedicle screws: a cadaver study to determine the benefits in the osteoporotic spine. Technol Health Care. 2014; 22(4):607-15. DOI: 10.3233/THC-140815. View

Yaman O, Demir T, Arslan A, Iyidiker M, Tolunay T, Camuscu N . The Comparison of Pullout Strengths of Various Pedicle Screw Designs on Synthetic Foams and Ovine Vertebrae. Turk Neurosurg. 2015; 25(4):532-238. DOI: 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.8907-13.1. View

McLain R, Fry M, Moseley T, Sharkey N . Lumbar pedicle screw salvage: pullout testing of three different pedicle screw designs. J Spinal Disord. 1995; 8(1):62-8. View

10.

Renner S, Lim T, Kim W, Katolik L, An H, Andersson G . Augmentation of pedicle screw fixation strength using an injectable calcium phosphate cement as a function of injection timing and method. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004; 29(11):E212-6. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200406010-00020. View

11.

Hsieh M, Liu M, Chen J, Tsai T, Lai P, Niu C . Biomechanical study of the fixation stability of broken pedicle screws and subsequent strategies. PLoS One. 2019; 14(6):e0219189. PMC: 6599116. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219189. View

12.

Kocak T, Cakir B, Reichel H, Mattes T . Screw loosening after posterior dynamic stabilization--review of the literature. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2010; 77(2):134-9. View

13.

Weinstein J, Rydevik B, Rauschning W . Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; (284):34-46. View

14.

Liu D, Zhang X, Liao D, Zhou J, Li Z, Zhang B . Biomechanical Comparison of Pedicle Screw Augmented with Different Volumes of Polymethylmethacrylate in Osteoporotic and Severely Osteoporotic Synthetic Bone Blocks in Primary Implantation: An Experimental Study. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:9627504. PMC: 4739206. DOI: 10.1155/2016/9627504. View

15.

Seebeck J, Goldhahn J, Stadele H, Messmer P, Morlock M, Schneider E . Effect of cortical thickness and cancellous bone density on the holding strength of internal fixator screws. J Orthop Res. 2004; 22(6):1237-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.orthres.2004.04.001. View

16.

Elder B, Lo S, Holmes C, Goodwin C, Kosztowski T, Lina I . The biomechanics of pedicle screw augmentation with cement. Spine J. 2015; 15(6):1432-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.03.016. View

17.

Glaser J, Stanley M, Sayre H, Woody J, Found E, Spratt K . A 10-year follow-up evaluation of lumbar spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(13):1390-5. DOI: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000067112.15753.AD. View

18.

Mehta H, Santos E, Ledonio C, Sembrano J, Ellingson A, Pare P . Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model. Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2011; 27(3):234-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.10.004. View

19.

Halvorson T, Kelley L, Thomas K, Whitecloud 3rd T, Cook S . Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19(21):2415-20. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199411000-00008. View

20.

Abshire B, McLain R, Valdevit A, Kambic H . Characteristics of pullout failure in conical and cylindrical pedicle screws after full insertion and back-out. Spine J. 2003; 1(6):408-14. DOI: 10.1016/s1529-9430(01)00119-x. View