» Articles » PMID: 32084216

A Vaccine Using Anaplasma Marginale Subdominant Type IV Secretion System Recombinant Proteins Was Not Protective Against a Virulent Challenge

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2020 Feb 22
PMID 32084216
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Anaplasma marginale is the most prevalent tick-borne livestock pathogen with worldwide distribution. Bovine anaplasmosis is a significant threat to cattle industry. Anaplasmosis outbreaks in endemic areas are prevented via vaccination with live A. centrale produced in splenectomized calves. Since A. centrale live vaccine can carry other pathogens and cause disease in adult cattle, research efforts are directed to develop safe recombinant subunit vaccines. Previous work found that the subdominant proteins of A. marginale type IV secretion system (T4SS) and the subdominant elongation factor-Tu (Ef-Tu) were involved in the protective immunity against the experimental challenge in cattle immunized with the A. marginale outer membrane (OM). This study evaluated the immunogenicity and protection conferred by recombinant VirB9.1, VirB9.2, VirB10, VirB11, and Ef-Tu proteins cloned and expressed in E. coli. Twenty steers were randomly clustered into four groups (G) of five animals each. Cattle from G1 and G2 were immunized with a mixture of 50 μg of each recombinant protein with Quil A® or Montanide™ adjuvants, respectively. Cattle from G3 and G4 (controls) were immunized with Quil A and Montanide adjuvants, respectively. Cattle received four immunizations at three-week intervals and were challenged with 107 A. marginale-parasitized erythrocytes 42 days after the fourth immunization. After challenge, all cattle showed clinical signs, with a significant drop of packed cell volume and a significant increase of parasitized erythrocytes (p<0.05), requiring treatment with oxytetracycline to prevent death. The levels of IgG2 induced in the immunized groups did not correlate with the observed lack of protection. Additional strategies are required to evaluate the role of these proteins and their potential utility in the development of effective vaccines.

Citing Articles

Development of a Recombinase-Mediated Cassette Exchange System for Gene Knockout and Expression of Non-Native Gene Sequences in .

Cull B, Burkhardt N, Khoo B, Oliver J, Wang X, Price L Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40006656 PMC: 11861799. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13020109.


Current vaccines, experimental immunization trials, and new perspectives to control selected vector borne blood parasites of veterinary importance.

Alzan H, Mahmoud M, Suarez C Front Vet Sci. 2024; 11:1484787.

PMID: 39606652 PMC: 11602000. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1484787.


Molecular Identification and Bioinformatics Analysis of Moonlighting Proteins as Possible Antigenic Targets.

Quiroz-Castaneda R, Aguilar-Diaz H, Coronado-Villanueva E, Catalan-Ochoa D, Amaro-Estrada I Pathogens. 2024; 13(10).

PMID: 39452716 PMC: 11510912. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13100845.


Bovine Anaplasmosis: Will there ever be an almighty effective vaccine?.

Salinas-Estrella E, Amaro-Estrada I, Cobaxin-Cardenas M, Preciado de la Torre J, Rodriguez S Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:946545.

PMID: 36277070 PMC: 9581321. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.946545.


Immune Response to Tick-Borne Hemoparasites: Host Adaptive Immune Response Mechanisms as Potential Targets for Therapies and Vaccines.

Torina A, Blanda V, Villari S, Piazza A, La Russa F, Grippi F Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(22).

PMID: 33233869 PMC: 7699928. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21228813.

References
1.
Noh S, Turse J, Brown W, Norimine J, Palmer G . Linkage between Anaplasma marginale outer membrane proteins enhances immunogenicity but is not required for protection from challenge. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2013; 20(5):651-6. PMC: 3647754. DOI: 10.1128/CVI.00600-12. View

2.
Baravalle M, Thompson C, Valentini B, Ferreira M, Torioni de Echaide S, Christensen M . Babesia bovis biological clones and the inter-strain allelic diversity of the Bv80 gene support subpopulation selection as a mechanism involved in the attenuation of two virulent isolates. Vet Parasitol. 2012; 190(3-4):391-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2012.06.037. View

3.
Lopez J, Siems W, Palmer G, Brayton K, McGuire T, Norimine J . Identification of novel antigenic proteins in a complex Anaplasma marginale outer membrane immunogen by mass spectrometry and genomic mapping. Infect Immun. 2005; 73(12):8109-18. PMC: 1307060. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.73.12.8109-8118.2005. View

4.
Abdala A, Pipano E, Aguirre D, Gaido A, Zurbriggen M, Mangold A . Frozen and fresh Anaplasma centrale vaccines in the protection of cattle against Anaplasma marginale infection. Rev Elev Med Vet Pays Trop. 1990; 43(2):155-8. View

5.
Abbott J, Palmer G, Kegerreis K, Hetrick P, Howard C, Hope J . Rapid and long-term disappearance of CD4+ T lymphocyte responses specific for Anaplasma marginale major surface protein-2 (MSP2) in MSP2 vaccinates following challenge with live A. marginale. J Immunol. 2005; 174(11):6702-15. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.11.6702. View