» Articles » PMID: 32075051

Detection of Beef Adulterated with Pork Using a Low-Cost Electronic Nose Based on Colorimetric Sensors

Overview
Journal Foods
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2020 Feb 21
PMID 32075051
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study was aimed at developing a low-cost but rapid technique for qualitative and quantitative detection of beef adulterated with pork. An electronic nose based on colorimetric sensors was proposed. The fresh beef rib steaks and streaky pork were purchased and used from the local agricultural market in Suzhou, China. The minced beef was mixed with pork ranging at levels from 0%~100% by weight at increments of 20%. Protein, fat, and ash content were measured for validation of the differences between the pure beef and pork used in basic chemical compositions. Fisher linear discriminant analysis (Fisher LDA) and extreme learning machine (ELM) were utilized comparatively for identification of the ground pure beef, beef-pork mixtures, and pure pork. Back propagation-artificial neural network (BP-ANN) models were built for prediction of the adulteration levels. Results revealed that the ELM model built was superior to the Fisher LDA model with higher identification rates of 91.27% and 87.5% in the training and prediction sets respectively. Regarding the adulteration level prediction, the correlation coefficient and the root mean square error were 0.85 and 0.147 respectively in the prediction set of the BP-ANN model built. This suggests, from all the results, that the low-cost electronic nose based on colorimetric sensors coupled with chemometrics has a great potential in rapid detection of beef adulterated with pork.

Citing Articles

LC-QTOF-MS evaluation of rabbit-specific peptide markers for meat quantitation.

Stachniuk A, Kozub A, Czeczko R, Montowska M, Fornal E J Food Drug Anal. 2024; 30(2):223-233.

PMID: 39666307 PMC: 9635904. DOI: 10.38212/2224-6614.3403.


Application of machine learning approach on halal meat authentication principle, challenges, and prospects: A review.

Mustapha A, Ishak I, Zaki N, Ismail-Fitry M, Arshad S, Sazili A Heliyon. 2024; 10(12):e32189.

PMID: 38975107 PMC: 11225673. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32189.


Bacteriological evaluation and advanced SYBR-green multiplex real-time PCR assay for detection of minced meat adulteration.

El-Sheikh S, Whab R, ElDaly R, Raslan M, Fahmy H, El-Demerdash A Open Vet J. 2024; 14(1):389-397.

PMID: 38633161 PMC: 11018440. DOI: 10.5455/OVJ.2024.v14.i1.35.


Assessing food availability and healthier options in an urban Chinese university: a case study using the Chinese Nutrition Environment Measurement Survey for Stores (C-NEMS-S).

Li X, Wang H, Manafe H, Braakhuis A, Li Z, Roy R BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):15.

PMID: 38167012 PMC: 10759656. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17415-8.


A Highly Sensitive Indirect Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) Based on a Monoclonal Antibody Specific to Thermal Stable-Soluble Protein in Pork Fat for the Rapid Detection of Pork Fat Adulterated in Heat-Processed Beef Meatballs.

Kim S, Lee J, Kim D, Lee S, Yang H, Shim W Food Sci Anim Resour. 2023; 43(6):989-1001.

PMID: 37969326 PMC: 10636219. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2023.e55.


References
1.
Zhang C, Bailey D, Suslick K . Colorimetric sensor arrays for the analysis of beers: a feasibility study. J Agric Food Chem. 2006; 54(14):4925-31. DOI: 10.1021/jf060110a. View

2.
Alamprese C, Amigo J, Casiraghi E, Engelsen S . Identification and quantification of turkey meat adulteration in fresh, frozen-thawed and cooked minced beef by FT-NIR spectroscopy and chemometrics. Meat Sci. 2016; 121:175-181. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.06.018. View

3.
Wilson A, Baietto M . Applications and advances in electronic-nose technologies. Sensors (Basel). 2012; 9(7):5099-148. PMC: 3274163. DOI: 10.3390/s90705099. View

4.
Rakow N, Suslick K . A colorimetric sensor array for odour visualization. Nature. 2000; 406(6797):710-3. DOI: 10.1038/35021028. View

5.
Baietto M, Wilson A . Electronic-nose applications for fruit identification, ripeness and quality grading. Sensors (Basel). 2015; 15(1):899-931. PMC: 4327056. DOI: 10.3390/s150100899. View