» Articles » PMID: 32075008

Microfluidics in Haemostasis: A Review

Overview
Journal Molecules
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Feb 21
PMID 32075008
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Haemostatic disorders are both complex and costly in relation to both their treatment and subsequent management. As leading causes of mortality worldwide, there is an ever-increasing drive to improve the diagnosis and prevention of haemostatic disorders. The field of microfluidic and Lab on a Chip (LOC) technologies is rapidly advancing and the important role of miniaturised diagnostics is becoming more evident in the healthcare system, with particular importance in near patient testing (NPT) and point of care (POC) settings. Microfluidic technologies present innovative solutions to diagnostic and clinical challenges which have the knock-on effect of improving health care and quality of life. In this review, both advanced microfluidic devices (R&D) and commercially available devices for the diagnosis and monitoring of haemostasis-related disorders and antithrombotic therapies, respectively, are discussed. Innovative design specifications, fabrication techniques, and modes of detection in addition to the materials used in developing micro-channels are reviewed in the context of application to the field of haemostasis.

Citing Articles

Injury-on-a-chip for modelling microvascular trauma-induced coagulation.

Deal H, Byrnes E, Pandit S, Sheridan A, Brown A, Daniele M Lab Chip. 2025; 25(3):440-453.

PMID: 39763291 PMC: 11704661. DOI: 10.1039/d4lc00471j.


Tracking Fibrinolysis of Chandler Loop-Formed Whole Blood Clots Under Shear Flow in An In-Vitro Thrombolysis Model.

Christodoulides A, Hall A, Umesh A, Alves N J Vis Exp. 2024; (206).

PMID: 38709048 PMC: 11152162. DOI: 10.3791/66524.


Shear Histories Alter Local Shear Effects on Thrombus Nucleation and Growth.

Kang J, Jayaraman A, Antaki J, Kirby B Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 52(4):1039-1050.

PMID: 38319505 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03439-z.


Microfluidics-assisted Tumor Cell Separation Approaches for Clinical Applications: An Overview on Emerging Devices.

Shanehband N, Naghib S Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2024; 28(2):202-225.

PMID: 38275060 DOI: 10.2174/0113862073277130231110111933.


Development of Novel Paper-Based Assay for Direct Serum Separation.

Al-Tamimi M, El-Sallaq M, Altarawneh S, Qaqish A, Ayoub M ACS Omega. 2023; 8(23):20370-20378.

PMID: 37332822 PMC: 10268636. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.3c00215.


References
1.
Mehling M, Tay S . Microfluidic cell culture. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014; 25:95-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.10.005. View

2.
Becker H, Locascio L . Polymer microfluidic devices. Talanta. 2008; 56(2):267-87. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-9140(01)00594-x. View

3.
Paszkowiak J, Dardik A . Arterial wall shear stress: observations from the bench to the bedside. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2003; 37(1):47-57. DOI: 10.1177/153857440303700107. View

4.
Murray E, Fitzmaurice D, McCahon D . Point of care testing for INR monitoring: where are we now?. Br J Haematol. 2004; 127(4):373-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05154.x. View

5.
Nicolau-Raducu R, Occhipinti E, Marshall T, Koveleskie J, Ganier D, Evans B . Thromboprophylaxis With Heparin During Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: Comparison of Hepcon HMS Plus and Anti-Xa Assays for Low-Range Heparin. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016; 31(2):575-581. DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.08.001. View