» Articles » PMID: 21858128

Changing Bee and Hoverfly Pollinator Assemblages Along an Urban-rural Gradient

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2011 Aug 23
PMID 21858128
Citations 71
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The potential for reduced pollination ecosystem service due to global declines of bees and other pollinators is cause for considerable concern. Habitat degradation, destruction and fragmentation due to agricultural intensification have historically been the main causes of this pollinator decline. However, despite increasing and accelerating levels of global urbanization, very little research has investigated the effects of urbanization on pollinator assemblages. We assessed changes in the diversity, abundance and species composition of bee and hoverfly pollinator assemblages in urban, suburban, and rural sites across a UK city.

Methodology/principal Findings: Bees and hoverflies were trapped and netted at 24 sites of similar habitat character (churchyards and cemeteries) that varied in position along a gradient of urbanization. Local habitat quality (altitude, shelter from wind, diversity and abundance of flowers), and the broader-scale degree of urbanization (e.g. percentage of built landscape and gardens within 100 m, 250 m, 500 m, 1 km, and 2.5 km of the site) were assessed for each study site. The diversity and abundance of pollinators were both significantly negatively associated with higher levels of urbanization. Assemblage composition changed along the urbanization gradient with some species positively associated with urban and suburban land-use, but more species negatively so. Pollinator assemblages were positively affected by good site habitat quality, in particular the availability of flowering plants.

Conclusions/significance: Our results show that urban areas can support diverse pollinator assemblages, but that this capacity is strongly affected by local habitat quality. Nonetheless, in both urban and suburban areas of the city the assemblages had fewer individuals and lower diversity than similar rural habitats. The unique development histories of different urban areas, and the difficulty of assessing mobile pollinator assemblages in just part of their range, mean that complementary studies in different cities and urban habitats are required to discover if these findings are more widely applicable.

Citing Articles

Insect Decline-Evaluation of Potential Drivers of a Complex Phenomenon.

Greve M, Marx M, Eilmus S, Ernst M, Herrmann J, Baden C Insects. 2025; 15(12.

PMID: 39769623 PMC: 11676483. DOI: 10.3390/insects15121021.


Variation in flower morphology associated with higher bee diversity in urban green spaces.

Sinno S, MacInnis G, Lessard J, Ziter C Ecol Appl. 2024; 35(1):e3067.

PMID: 39609370 PMC: 11725627. DOI: 10.1002/eap.3067.


High variability in the attractiveness of municipally-planted decorative plants to insects.

Czaczkes T, Breuss C, Kurze C PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17762.

PMID: 39525476 PMC: 11549908. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17762.


The flower does not open in the city: evolution of plant reproductive traits of Portulaca oleracea in urban populations.

Fujita T, Tsuda N, Koide D, Fukano Y, Inoue T Ann Bot. 2024; 135(1-2):269-276.

PMID: 39084677 PMC: 11805939. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcae105.


The Impact of Wildflower Habitat on Insect Functional Group Abundance in Turfgrass Systems.

Hamon L, Kilpatrick L, Billeisen T Insects. 2024; 15(7).

PMID: 39057253 PMC: 11277235. DOI: 10.3390/insects15070520.


References
1.
Greenleaf S, Williams N, Winfree R, Kremen C . Bee foraging ranges and their relationship to body size. Oecologia. 2007; 153(3):589-96. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0752-9. View

2.
Aizen M, Harder L . The global stock of domesticated honey bees is growing slower than agricultural demand for pollination. Curr Biol. 2009; 19(11):915-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.03.071. View

3.
Winfree R, Williams N, Dushoff J, Kremen C . Native bees provide insurance against ongoing honey bee losses. Ecol Lett. 2007; 10(11):1105-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01110.x. View

4.
Goulson D, Lye G, Darvill B . Decline and conservation of bumble bees. Annu Rev Entomol. 2007; 53:191-208. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093454. View

5.
Sattler T, Borcard D, Arlettaz R, Bontadina F, Legendre P, Obrist M . Spider, bee, and bird communities in cities are shaped by environmental control and high stochasticity. Ecology. 2010; 91(11):3343-53. DOI: 10.1890/09-1810.1. View