» Articles » PMID: 32051691

Bottom-up Citizen Initiatives As Emergent Actors in Flood Risk Management: Mapping Roles, Relations and Limitations

Overview
Date 2020 Feb 14
PMID 32051691
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The recent shift to individualisation of flood risk calls for a stronger involvement of private actors. Bottom-up citizen initiatives (BUIs) may bring together governmental bodies with people at risk. Drawing on a screening of existing BUIs in Europe, North America, and Australia and an in-depth analysis of three study sites, this paper maps BUI activities to stages in the risk management cycle and discusses the institutional, relational and social proximity between BUIs and other stakeholders. Flood BUIs often take over roles that the authorities are not willing or able to fulfil. BUIs emerge out of frustration with current risk policies, after a catastrophic flood event, government-initiated engagement projects or targeted funding opportunities. BUIs can take different forms, ranging from oppositional pressure groups, self-help movements for disaster response and recovery, to initiatives formally installed by law. While self-organised BUIs benefit from high proximity to their home communities, formalised BUIs are deeper embedded in existing institutional structures. In order to gain a stronger voice in the risk debate, BUIs need to expand from the local level to catchment areas and exchange expertise and resources in nationwide or cross-border networks. However, BUIs may create parallel political structures that are not democratically legitimised.

Citing Articles

Preferences for public engagement in decision-making regarding four COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical interventions in the Netherlands: A survey study.

Kemper S, Bongers M, Kupper F, de Vries M, Timen A PLoS One. 2023; 18(10):e0292119.

PMID: 37796885 PMC: 10553365. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292119.


Voices of society: the emergence of civil-society practices aiming to engage in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic in the Netherlands.

Kemper S, van den Broek R, van Hameren S, Kupper J, Bongers M, de Weger E BMJ Glob Health. 2023; 8(8).

PMID: 37607772 PMC: 10445389. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-012875.


Community Organising Frameworks, Models, and Processes to Improve Health: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Kadariya S, Ball L, Chua D, Ryding H, Hobby J, Marsh J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(7).

PMID: 37047956 PMC: 10093850. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20075341.


How path dependency manifests in flood risk management: observations from four decades in the Ennstal and Aist catchments in Austria.

Seebauer S, Thaler T, Hanger-Kopp S, Schinko T Reg Environ Change. 2023; 23(1):31.

PMID: 36741242 PMC: 9885389. DOI: 10.1007/s10113-023-02029-y.


Enhancing Local Disaster Management Network through Developing Resilient Community in New Taipei City, Taiwan.

Ke K, Lin Y, Tan Y, Pan T, Tai L, Lee C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(15).

PMID: 32722337 PMC: 7432184. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17155357.


References
1.
Newig J, Kochskamper E, Challies E, Jager N . Exploring governance learning: How policymakers draw on evidence, experience and intuition in designing participatory flood risk planning. Environ Sci Policy. 2017; 55:353-360. PMC: 5268346. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.020. View

2.
Seebauer S, Ortner S, Babcicky P, Thaler T . Bottom-up citizen initiatives as emergent actors in flood risk management: Mapping roles, relations and limitations. J Flood Risk Manag. 2020; 12(3):e12468. PMC: 7003449. DOI: 10.1111/jfr3.12468. View

3.
Reed M, Graves A, Dandy N, Posthumus H, Hubacek K, Morris J . Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J Environ Manage. 2009; 90(5):1933-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001. View

4.
Moser S, Ekstrom J . A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(51):22026-31. PMC: 3009757. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1007887107. View

5.
Anderson C . Presenting and evaluating qualitative research. Am J Pharm Educ. 2010; 74(8):141. PMC: 2987281. DOI: 10.5688/aj7408141. View