» Articles » PMID: 32041873

Widespread Organ Tolerance to Xist Loss and X Reactivation Except Under Chronic Stress in the Gut

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2020 Feb 12
PMID 32041873
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Long thought to be dispensable after establishing X chromosome inactivation (XCI), Xist RNA is now known to also maintain the inactive X (Xi). To what extent somatic X reactivation causes physiological abnormalities is an active area of inquiry. Here, we use multiple mouse models to investigate in vivo consequences. First, when is deleted systemically in post-XCI embryonic cells using the Meox2-Cre driver, female pups exhibit no morbidity or mortality despite partial X reactivation. Second, when is conditionally deleted in epithelial cells using Keratin14-Cre or in B cells using CD19-Cre, female mice have a normal life span without obvious illness. Third, when is deleted in gut using Villin-Cre, female mice remain healthy despite significant X-autosome dosage imbalance. Finally, when the gut is acutely stressed by azoxymethane/dextran sulfate (AOM/DSS) exposure, both -deleted and wild-type mice develop gastrointestinal tumors. Intriguingly, however, under prolonged stress, mutant mice develop larger tumors and have a higher tumor burden. The effect is female specific. Altogether, these observations reveal a surprising systemic tolerance to Xist loss but importantly reveal that and XCI are protective to females during chronic stress.

Citing Articles

Biotin Induces Inactive Chromosome X Reactivation and Corrects Physiopathological Alterations in Beta-Propeller-Protein-Associated Neurodegeneration.

Reche-Lopez D, Romero-Gonzalez A, Alvarez-Cordoba M, Suarez-Carrillo A, Cilleros-Holgado P, Pinero-Perez R Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(3).

PMID: 39941083 PMC: 11818482. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26031315.


Female-bias in systemic lupus erythematosus: How much is the X chromosome to blame?.

Vieira A, Almada-Correia I, Inacio J, Costa-Reis P, da Rocha S Biol Sex Differ. 2024; 15(1):76.

PMID: 39375734 PMC: 11460073. DOI: 10.1186/s13293-024-00650-y.


A genetic basis for sex differences in Xp11 translocation renal cell carcinoma.

Achom M, Sadagopan A, Bao C, McBride F, Li J, Konda P Cell. 2024; 187(20):5735-5752.e25.

PMID: 39168126 PMC: 11455617. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.07.038.


Altered X-chromosome inactivation predisposes to autoimmunity.

Huret C, Ferraye L, David A, Mohamed M, Valentin N, Charlotte F Sci Adv. 2024; 10(18):eadn6537.

PMID: 38701219 PMC: 11068014. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adn6537.


Escape from X inactivation is directly modulated by levels of Xist non-coding RNA.

Hauth A, Panten J, Kneuss E, Picard C, Servant N, Rall I bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38559194 PMC: 10979913. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.22.581559.


References
1.
Mak W, Nesterova T, de Napoles M, Appanah R, Yamanaka S, Otte A . Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos. Science. 2004; 303(5658):666-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1092674. View

2.
Starmer J, Magnuson T . A new model for random X chromosome inactivation. Development. 2008; 136(1):1-10. PMC: 2630377. DOI: 10.1242/dev.025908. View

3.
Payer B, Rosenberg M, Yamaji M, Yabuta Y, Koyanagi-Aoi M, Hayashi K . Tsix RNA and the germline factor, PRDM14, link X reactivation and stem cell reprogramming. Mol Cell. 2013; 52(6):805-18. PMC: 3950835. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.023. View

4.
Minajigi A, Froberg J, Wei C, Sunwoo H, Kesner B, Colognori D . Chromosomes. A comprehensive Xist interactome reveals cohesin repulsion and an RNA-directed chromosome conformation. Science. 2015; 349(6245). PMC: 4845908. DOI: 10.1126/science.aab2276. View

5.
Zhang L, Huynh K, Lee J . Perinucleolar targeting of the inactive X during S phase: evidence for a role in the maintenance of silencing. Cell. 2007; 129(4):693-706. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.036. View