» Articles » PMID: 32013212

An Exploration of Machine-Learning Estimation of Ground Reaction Force from Wearable Sensor Data

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2020 Feb 5
PMID 32013212
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to develop a wearable sensor system, using machine-learning models, capable of accurately estimating peak ground reaction force (GRF) during ballet jumps in the field. Female dancers (n = 30) performed a series of bilateral and unilateral ballet jumps. Dancers wore six ActiGraph Link wearable sensors (100 Hz). Data were collected simultaneously from two AMTI force platforms and synchronised with the ActiGraph data. Due to sensor hardware malfunctions and synchronisation issues, a multistage approach to model development, using a reduced data set, was taken. Using data from the 14 dancers with complete multi-sensor synchronised data, the best single sensor was determined. Subsequently, the best single sensor model was refined and validated using all available data for that sensor (23 dancers). Root mean square error (RMSE) in body weight (BW) and correlation coefficients (r) were used to assess the GRF profile, and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess model peak GRF accuracy. The model based on sacrum data was the most accurate single sensor model (unilateral landings: RMSE = 0.24 BW, r = 0.95; bilateral landings: RMSE = 0.21 BW, r = 0.98) with the refined model still showing good accuracy (unilateral: RMSE = 0.42 BW, r = 0.80; bilateral: RMSE = 0.39 BW, r = 0.92). Machine-learning models applied to wearable sensor data can provide a field-based system for GRF estimation during ballet jumps.

Citing Articles

Using Inertial Measurement Units and Machine Learning to Classify Body Positions of Adults in a Hospital Bed.

Becker E, Khaksar S, Booker H, Hill K, Ren Y, Tan T Sensors (Basel). 2025; 25(2.

PMID: 39860868 PMC: 11768671. DOI: 10.3390/s25020499.


A Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Pedaling Force Profile in Cycling.

Ahmadi R, Rasoulian S, Veisari S, Parsaei A, Heidary H, Herzog W Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(19).

PMID: 39409480 PMC: 11479353. DOI: 10.3390/s24196440.


Estimation of Kinetics Using IMUs to Monitor and Aid in Clinical Decision-Making during ACL Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.

Krishnakumar S, van Beijnum B, Baten C, Veltink P, Buurke J Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(7).

PMID: 38610374 PMC: 11014074. DOI: 10.3390/s24072163.


A Wearable Real-time Kinematic and Kinetic Measurement Sensor Setup for Human Locomotion.

Wang H, Basu A, Durandau G, Sartori M Wearable Technol. 2023; 4.

PMID: 37091825 PMC: 7614461. DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2023.7.


Machine-Learning-Based Methodology for Estimation of Shoulder Load in Wheelchair-Related Activities Using Wearables.

Amrein S, Werner C, Arnet U, de Vries W Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(3).

PMID: 36772617 PMC: 9918997. DOI: 10.3390/s23031577.


References
1.
Ancillao A, Tedesco S, Barton J, OFlynn B . Indirect Measurement of Ground Reaction Forces and Moments by Means of Wearable Inertial Sensors: A Systematic Review. Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18(8). PMC: 6111315. DOI: 10.3390/s18082564. View

2.
Bessone V, Petrat J, Schwirtz A . Ground Reaction Forces and Kinematics of Ski Jump Landing Using Wearable Sensors. Sensors (Basel). 2019; 19(9). PMC: 6539877. DOI: 10.3390/s19092011. View

3.
DeVita P, Skelly W . Effect of landing stiffness on joint kinetics and energetics in the lower extremity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992; 24(1):108-15. View

4.
Slater A, Campbell A, Smith A, Straker L . Greater lower limb flexion in gymnastic landings is associated with reduced landing force: a repeated measures study. Sports Biomech. 2015; 14(1):45-56. DOI: 10.1080/14763141.2015.1029514. View

5.
Harwood A, Campbell A, Hendry D, Ng L, Wild C . Differences in lower limb biomechanics between ballet dancers and non-dancers during functional landing tasks. Phys Ther Sport. 2018; 32:180-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2018.05.005. View