» Articles » PMID: 32011698

Concordance of Various Chromosomal Errors Among Different Parts of the Embryo and the Value of Re-biopsy in Embryos with Segmental Aneuploidies

Overview
Journal Mol Hum Reprod
Date 2020 Feb 4
PMID 32011698
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chromosomal mosaicism detected during preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and its impact on embryo implantation have been widely discussed, and healthy live births from mosaic embryos were reported by many groups. On the other hand, only very few studies have focused on segmental chromosome aneuploidies and their clinical impact. Eighty-nine embryos with various PGT-A results (trophectoderm 1: TE1) were re-analysed using a second trophectoderm biopsy (TE2) and the rest of the embryo (RE) for testing. Of 19 euploid TE1 biopsies, 18 were concordant across TE2 and RE. Similarly, whole chromosomal aneuploidies were concordant in 59 of 62 TE1-TE2 and 58 TE1-RE. In contrast, from 31 segmental aneuploidies detected in TE1, only 15 were observed again in TE2 and 14 in RE. If a TE1 segmental abnormality appeared again in TE2, it was almost always present in RE (17/18) as well. Moreover, when a TE1 segmental abnormality was not detected in TE2, in 12 out of 13 cases RE was also unaffected. Similarly, only 1 of 26 TE1 whole chromosome mosaics were repeated in TE2 and 7 in RE. Our study confirms that euploid and whole chromosomal aneuploidy results are highly predictive of the embryo. In contrast, mosaicism has a very low concordance rate. Most importantly, re-biopsy of embryos with segmental aneuploidies demonstrated that they are mostly not uniform across the embryo. Finally, in the case of segmental aneuploidy, the second biopsy enables an accurate prediction of the real status of the embryo and could be offered to patients undergoing PGT-A.

Citing Articles

The diagnostic accuracy of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in assessing the genetic status of embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chen K, Hu Z, Lian Y, Han Y, Zhou X, Li Y Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2025; 23(1):39.

PMID: 40069837 PMC: 11895315. DOI: 10.1186/s12958-025-01376-1.


The correlation between blastocyst morphological parameters and chromosomal euploidy, aneuploidy and other chromosomal abnormalities following pre-implantation genetic testing-a single center retrospective study.

Hochberg A, Amoura L, Zhang X, Zhang L, Dahan M, Ao A Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025; .

PMID: 39878851 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-025-07968-x.


Healthy live births achieved from embryos diagnosed as non-mosaic segmental aneuploid.

Besser A, Weidenbaum E, Buldo-Licciardi J, McCaffrey C, Grifo J, Blakemore J J Assist Reprod Genet. 2024; 41(12):3379-3385.

PMID: 39384706 PMC: 11707125. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03282-8.


Re-Examination of PGT-A Detected Genetic Pathology in Compartments of Human Blastocysts: A Series of 23 Cases.

Tikhonov A, Krapivin M, Malysheva O, Komarova E, Golubeva A, Efimova O J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38893001 PMC: 11172919. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113289.


Chromosomal Aberrations As a Biological Phenomenon in Human Embryonic Development.

Ivanova A, Semenova M Acta Naturae. 2023; 15(3):27-36.

PMID: 37908766 PMC: 10615189. DOI: 10.32607/actanaturae.25255.


References
1.
Victor A, Tyndall J, Brake A, Lepkowsky L, Murphy A, Griffin D . One hundred mosaic embryos transferred prospectively in a single clinic: exploring when and why they result in healthy pregnancies. Fertil Steril. 2019; 111(2):280-293. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.10.019. View

2.
Victor A, Griffin D, Brake A, Tyndall J, Murphy A, Lepkowsky L . Assessment of aneuploidy concordance between clinical trophectoderm biopsy and blastocyst. Hum Reprod. 2018; 34(1):181-192. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey327. View

3.
Franasiak J, Forman E, Hong K, Werner M, Upham K, Treff N . The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril. 2013; 101(3):656-663.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004. View

4.
Munne S, Chen S, Colls P, Garrisi J, Zheng X, Cekleniak N . Maternal age, morphology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage-stage embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007; 14(5):628-34. DOI: 10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61057-7. View

5.
Nagaoka S, Hassold T, Hunt P . Human aneuploidy: mechanisms and new insights into an age-old problem. Nat Rev Genet. 2012; 13(7):493-504. PMC: 3551553. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3245. View