» Articles » PMID: 26491874

Evidence of Selection Against Complex Mitotic-Origin Aneuploidy During Preimplantation Development

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2015 Oct 23
PMID 26491874
Citations 97
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Whole-chromosome imbalances affect over half of early human embryos and are the leading cause of pregnancy loss. While these errors frequently arise in oocyte meiosis, many such whole-chromosome abnormalities affecting cleavage-stage embryos are the result of chromosome missegregation occurring during the initial mitotic cell divisions. The first wave of zygotic genome activation at the 4-8 cell stage results in the arrest of a large proportion of embryos, the vast majority of which contain whole-chromosome abnormalities. Thus, the full spectrum of meiotic and mitotic errors can only be detected by sampling after the initial cell divisions, but prior to this selective filter. Here, we apply 24-chromosome preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) to 28,052 single-cell day-3 blastomere biopsies and 18,387 multi-cell day-5 trophectoderm biopsies from 6,366 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. We precisely characterize the rates and patterns of whole-chromosome abnormalities at each developmental stage and distinguish errors of meiotic and mitotic origin without embryo disaggregation, based on informative chromosomal signatures. We show that mitotic errors frequently involve multiple chromosome losses that are not biased toward maternal or paternal homologs. This outcome is characteristic of spindle abnormalities and chaotic cell division detected in previous studies. In contrast to meiotic errors, our data also show that mitotic errors are not significantly associated with maternal age. PGS patients referred due to previous IVF failure had elevated rates of mitotic error, while patients referred due to recurrent pregnancy loss had elevated rates of meiotic error, controlling for maternal age. These results support the conclusion that mitotic error is the predominant mechanism contributing to pregnancy losses occurring prior to blastocyst formation. This high-resolution view of the full spectrum of whole-chromosome abnormalities affecting early embryos provides insight into the cytogenetic mechanisms underlying their formation and the consequences for human fertility.

Citing Articles

Successful pregnancy after preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements in a couple with complex chromosome rearrangement and recurrent in vitro fertilization failures: a case report.

Upadhyay D, Al Halaby R, Anandt S, Albuz F, Varghese M, Peramo B F S Rep. 2025; 5(4):439-452.

PMID: 39781078 PMC: 11705569. DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2024.10.006.


Chromosome architecture and low cohesion bias acrocentric chromosomes towards aneuploidy during mammalian meiosis.

Bellou E, Zielinska A, Monnich E, Schweizer N, Politi A, Wellecke A Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10713.

PMID: 39715766 PMC: 11666783. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54659-3.


On the origin of mitosis-derived human embryo aneuploidy.

Leem J, Gowett M, Bolarinwa S, Mogessie B Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):10391.

PMID: 39613785 PMC: 11607320. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54953-0.


Aligning genotyping and copy number data in single trophectoderm biopsies for aneuploidy prediction: uncovering incomplete concordance.

De Witte L, Baetens M, Tilleman K, Vanden Meerschaut F, Janssens S, Van Tongerloo A Hum Reprod Open. 2024; 2024(4):hoae056.

PMID: 39391861 PMC: 11461285. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae056.


Female-age-dependent changes in the lipid fingerprint of the mammalian oocytes.

Bisogno S, Depciuch J, Gulzar H, Heber M, Kobialka M, Gasior L Hum Reprod. 2024; 39(12):2754-2767.

PMID: 39366679 PMC: 11630086. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae225.


References
1.
Hassold T, Chiu D . Maternal age-specific rates of numerical chromosome abnormalities with special reference to trisomy. Hum Genet. 1985; 70(1):11-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00389450. View

2.
Coonen E, Derhaag J, Dumoulin J, van Wissen L, Bras M, Janssen M . Anaphase lagging mainly explains chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19(2):316-24. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh077. View

3.
Franasiak J, Forman E, Hong K, Werner M, Upham K, Treff N . The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril. 2013; 101(3):656-663.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004. View

4.
Fragouli E, Wells D, Thornhill A, Serhal P, Faed M, Harper J . Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies. Hum Reprod. 2006; 21(9):2319-28. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/del157. View

5.
Bielanska M, Jin S, Bernier M, Tan S, Ao A . Diploid-aneuploid mosaicism in human embryos cultured to the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2005; 84(2):336-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.031. View