» Articles » PMID: 32006668

Prevalence of Noncarious Cervical Lesions Among Adults: A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal J Dent
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2020 Feb 2
PMID 32006668
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to systematically review the literature on noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) and calculate an overall prevalence estimate.

Methods: The protocol of this systematic review was prepared according to PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. The MEDLINE-PubMed and Cochrane-CENTRAL databases were searched. Relevant published papers that provided information regarding the prevalence or number of NCCLs among general or specific populations were included.

Results: The initial search identified 569 titles and abstracts, 24 of which met the eligibility criteria involving 14,628 participants. The weighted mean prevalence of NCCLs among the whole studied population was 46.7 % (95 % CI: 38.2; 55.3 %), ranging from 9.1%-93%. Based on sub-analyses, studies with populations older than 30 years revealed higher weighted prevalence (53 %) than those with populations younger than 30 years (43 %). Regarding the diagnostic method, when visual or tactile clinical examination was used, the prevalence was lower than when the Smith and Knight tooth wear index was used. When different definitions were used, the weighted mean prevalence varied from 28 % to 62 %. As to the terms used to address the lesions, the prevalence was higher when "noncarious cervical lesion" was used and lower when "root defects," "abrasion," or "abfraction" were used. When geographical regions were compared, South America had the highest reported prevalence of NCCLs, while the United States had the lowest. Moreover, general populations presented the highest prevalence, slightly higher than dental populations, whose members frequented dental practices.

Conclusion: The overall prevalence of NCCLs was 46.7 % and higher in older populations. Visual and tactile clinical examination underestimate this prevalence compared to the established index. The terms and definitions used also influenced the prevalence data. Distinct geographical differences were observed, and general populations were more inclined to present NCCLs.

Citing Articles

In vitro evaluation and comparison of the abrasive capacity of zirconia whitening toothpaste at different concentrations on the radicular dentin surface of human teeth.

Stavileci M, Pustina T, Salihu B, Veronneau J, Bajrami X, Gjelaj A Heliyon. 2025; 11(3):e41867.

PMID: 39959488 PMC: 11830339. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41867.


Periodontal Evaluation for a New Alkasite Restorative Material in Noncarious Cervical Lesions: A Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Mustafa K, Alfakhry G, Milly H Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024; 10(6):e70025.

PMID: 39400529 PMC: 11471885. DOI: 10.1002/cre2.70025.


A 48-month clinical performance of hybrid ceramic fragment restorations manufactured in CAD/CAM in non-carious cervical lesions: case report.

Favoreto M, Cochinski G, Martini E, Matos T, Bandeca M, Loguercio A Restor Dent Endod. 2024; 49(3):e32.

PMID: 39247641 PMC: 11377872. DOI: 10.5395/rde.2024.49.e32.


Risk Factors associated with noncarious cervical lesions.

Fontelle G, do Nascimento F, Silva P, Rolim J J Clin Exp Dent. 2024; 16(7):e873-e878.

PMID: 39219831 PMC: 11360462. DOI: 10.4317/jced.61349.


Performance of self-cured versus light-cured universal adhesive in patients with non-carious cervical lesions: 18-month randomized clinical trial.

Ashour A, Abd ElAziz R, Yassen A BDJ Open. 2024; 10(1):25.

PMID: 38504124 PMC: 10951209. DOI: 10.1038/s41405-024-00204-9.