» Articles » PMID: 31997114

ERG Shrinks by 10% when Reducing Dark Adaptation Time to 10 min, but Only for Weak Flashes

Overview
Journal Doc Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2020 Jan 31
PMID 31997114
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare dark-adapted (DA) ERG between 10, 15 and 20 min of dark adaptation (DA).

Methods: In a counterbalanced random block design, 40 healthy adult subjects were dark-adapted for 10, 15 or 20 min before we recorded ERGs to nine flash strengths from 0.001 to 10.0 cd s/m (dilated pupils) with a DTL-like electrode. Before and between sessions, the room was lit. Apart from choosing a wider range of stimulus strengths, and adding shorter DA times, the recordings fully complied with the ISCEV ERG Standard, namely using corneal electrodes, mydriasis and a standard DA sequence.

Results: The a-wave amplitude was not affected by any adaptation condition. For the b-wave amplitude, effects of reduced DA time are stronger for weaker flashes: Reducing DA from 20 to 10 min had no measurable effect on the DA 3 ERG, but reduced the DA 0.01 b-wave significantly (p < 0.0001) to 87 ± 2% (mean ± SEM). The DA 0.001 b-wave (not part of the ISCEV ERG Standard) was more affected (down to 72 ± 4%). There was a small, but significant, increase, only for weak flashes, in a- and b-wave peak times for 20 compared to 10-min dark adaptation time.

Conclusion: Reducing dark adaptation time from 20 to 10 min in normal participants has no effect on the ISCEV DA 3 and DA 10 ERG. The reduction in DA 0.01 ERGs to 87 ± 2% agrees with Hamilton and Graham (Doc Ophthalmol 133:11-19, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-016-9554-x ) who found 90 ± 2% and with Asakawa et al. (Doc Ophthalmol 139:33-44, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-019-09693-8 ) who found 83%. Pending verification in pathophysiological states, the current results suggest that one might be able to correct for the 10% amplitude loss when gaining 10 min through shortened DA.

Citing Articles

Enhancing Electroretinogram Classification with Multi-Wavelet Analysis and Visual Transformer.

Kulyabin M, Zhdanov A, Dolganov A, Ronkin M, Borisov V, Maier A Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(21).

PMID: 37960427 PMC: 10648817. DOI: 10.3390/s23218727.


Human retinal dark adaptation tracked in vivo with the electroretinogram: insights into processes underlying recovery of cone- and rod-mediated vision.

Jiang X, Mahroo O J Physiol. 2022; 600(21):4603-4621.

PMID: 35612091 PMC: 9796346. DOI: 10.1113/JP283105.

References
1.
Hamilton R, Graham K . Effect of shorter dark adaptation on ISCEV standard DA 0.01 and DA 3 skin ERGs in healthy adults. Doc Ophthalmol. 2016; 133(1):11-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10633-016-9554-x. View

2.
DOMEY R, McFARLAND R, Chadwick E . Dark adaptation as a function of age and time. II. A derivation. J Gerontol. 1960; 15:267-79. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/15.3.267. View

3.
Asakawa K, Ito A, Kobayashi H, Iwai A, Ito C, Ishikawa H . Adaptation time, electroretinography, and pupillography in healthy subjects. Doc Ophthalmol. 2019; 139(1):33-44. DOI: 10.1007/s10633-019-09693-8. View

4.
McCulloch D, Marmor M, Brigell M, Hamilton R, Holder G, Tzekov R . ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update). Doc Ophthalmol. 2014; 130(1):1-12. DOI: 10.1007/s10633-014-9473-7. View

5.
. Standard for clinical electroretinography. International Standardization Committee. Arch Ophthalmol. 1989; 107(6):816-9. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1989.01070010838024. View