» Articles » PMID: 31989528

In Vivo Ankle Kinematics Revealed Through Biplane Radiography: Current Concepts, Recent Literature, and Future Directions

Overview
Date 2020 Jan 29
PMID 31989528
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: Lateral ligament repair, specifically the modified Broström-Gould (BG) procedure, has been described for patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) after failure of nonoperative management. However, there is minimal data about native in vivo ankle bone kinematics and how repairs such as the BG procedure affect the kinematics. The objective of this review is to appraise existing literature that used biplane radiography to measure in vivo kinematics of the ankle in healthy, CAI, and BG populations.

Recent Findings: Results showed that the tibiotalar joint contributes more to dorsi/plantarflexion, the subtalar joint contributes more to inversion/eversion and internal/external rotation, and that both joints are capable of complex three-dimensional (3D) motion. Preliminary data suggests that demanding activities (as opposed to walking) are necessary to elicit kinematic differences between healthy and CAI populations. Results also indicate that the BG procedure restores static kinematics and range of motion. All but one of the studies identified in this review collected static, quasi-stance, or partial gait capture data. The strength of our current knowledge is low given the small sample sizes, exploratory nature of previous work, and lack of rigorous experimental design in previous studies. Future directions include development of an improved protocol for establishing coordinate systems in the ankle bones, continued development of a database of normal kinematics during a variety of activities, and large-scale, longitudinal studies of CAI and BG patients.

Citing Articles

Kinetic changes of gait initiation in individuals with chronic ankle instability: A systematic review.

Mortezanejad M, Daryabor A, Ebrahimabadi Z, Rahimi A, Yousefi M, Ehsani F Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(11):e70143.

PMID: 39479288 PMC: 11522363. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70143.


analysis of ankle joint kinematics and ligament deformation of chronic ankle instability patients during level walking.

Ruan Y, Wang S, Zhang N, Jiang Z, Mei N, Li P Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1441005.

PMID: 39165404 PMC: 11333339. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1441005.


Recommendation of minimal distal tibial length for long axis coordinate system definitions.

Muhlrad E, Peterson A, Anderson A, Aragon K, Lisonbee R, MacWilliams B J Biomech. 2024; 170:112153.

PMID: 38795543 PMC: 11220913. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2024.112153.


Influence of Talar and Calcaneal Morphology on Subtalar Kinematics During Walking.

Yamamoto T, Paulus P, Setliff J, Hogan M, Anderst W Foot Ankle Int. 2024; 45(6):632-640.

PMID: 38491768 PMC: 11164638. DOI: 10.1177/10711007241231981.


Automatic anatomical foot and ankle coordinate toolbox.

Peterson A, Kruger K, Lenz A Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1255464.

PMID: 38026875 PMC: 10644787. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1255464.


References
1.
Caputo A, Lee J, Spritzer C, Easley M, DeOrio J, Nunley 2nd J . In vivo kinematics of the tibiotalar joint after lateral ankle instability. Am J Sports Med. 2009; 37(11):2241-8. PMC: 2891039. DOI: 10.1177/0363546509337578. View

2.
Behrens S, Drakos M, Lee B, Paller D, Hoffman E, Koruprolu S . Biomechanical analysis of Brostrom versus Brostrom-Gould lateral ankle instability repairs. Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34(4):587-92. DOI: 10.1177/1071100713477622. View

3.
Nichols J, Roach K, Fiorentino N, Anderson A . Predicting tibiotalar and subtalar joint angles from skin-marker data with dual-fluoroscopy as a reference standard. Gait Posture. 2016; 49:136-143. PMC: 5810542. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.06.031. View

4.
Freeman M . Instability of the foot after injuries to the lateral ligament of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1965; 47(4):669-77. View

5.
Liu S, BAKER C . Comparison of lateral ankle ligamentous reconstruction procedures. Am J Sports Med. 1994; 22(3):313-7. DOI: 10.1177/036354659402200303. View