» Articles » PMID: 31938473

Distinct Seasonal Dynamics of Responses to Elevated CO in Two Understorey Grass Species Differing in Shade-tolerance

Overview
Journal Ecol Evol
Date 2020 Jan 16
PMID 31938473
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understorey plant communities are crucial to maintain species diversity and ecosystem processes including nutrient cycling and regeneration of overstorey trees. Most studies exploring effects of elevated CO concentration ([CO]) in forests have, however, been done on overstorey trees, while understorey communities received only limited attention.The hypothesis that understorey grass species differ in shade-tolerance and development dynamics, and temporally exploit different niches under elevated [CO], was tested during the fourth year of [CO] treatment. We assumed stimulated carbon gain by elevated [CO] even at low light conditions in strongly shade-tolerant , while its stimulation under elevated [CO] in less shade-tolerant was expected only in early spring when the tree canopy is not fully developed.We found evidence supporting this hypothesis. While elevated [CO] stimulated photosynthesis in mainly in the peak of the growing season (by 55%-57% in July and August), even at low light intensities (50 µmol m s), stimulatory effect of [CO] in was found mainly under high light intensities (200 µmol m s) at the beginning of the growing season (increase by 171% in May) and gradually declined during the season. Elevated [CO] also substantially stimulated leaf mass area and root-to-shoot ratio in , while only insignificant increases were observed in .Our physiological and morphological analyses indicate that understorey species, differing in shade-tolerance, under elevated [CO] exploit distinct niches in light environment given by the dynamics of the tree canopy.

Citing Articles

Transcriptome analysis reveals the accelerated expression of genes related to photosynthesis and chlorophyll biosynthesis contribution to shade-tolerant in Phoebe bournei.

An J, Wei X, Huo H BMC Plant Biol. 2022; 22(1):268.

PMID: 35650536 PMC: 9158164. DOI: 10.1186/s12870-022-03657-y.


Distinct seasonal dynamics of responses to elevated CO in two understorey grass species differing in shade-tolerance.

Holub P, Klem K, Linder S, Urban O Ecol Evol. 2020; 9(24):13663-13677.

PMID: 31938473 PMC: 6953567. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5738.

References
1.
Poorter H, Navas M . Plant growth and competition at elevated CO : on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytol. 2021; 157(2):175-198. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00680.x. View

2.
Leakey A, Ainsworth E, Bernacchi C, Rogers A, Long S, Ort D . Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen, and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. J Exp Bot. 2009; 60(10):2859-76. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp096. View

3.
Way D, Oren R, Kroner Y . The space-time continuum: the effects of elevated CO2 and temperature on trees and the importance of scaling. Plant Cell Environ. 2015; 38(6):991-1007. DOI: 10.1111/pce.12527. View

4.
Tschaplinski T, Stewart D, Hanson P, Norby R . Interactions between drought and elevated CO on growth and gas exchange of seedlings of three deciduous tree species. New Phytol. 2021; 129(1):63-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb03010.x. View

5.
Osborne , Roche , Garcia , Kimball , Wall , Pinter . Does leaf position within a canopy affect acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2?. Analysis Of a wheat crop under free-air co2 enrichment . Plant Physiol. 1998; 117(3):1037-45. PMC: 34920. DOI: 10.1104/pp.117.3.1037. View