» Articles » PMID: 31938404

Correlation Between Clinicopathological Features and , , and Mutation Status in Chinese Colorectal Cancer Patients

Overview
Specialty Pathology
Date 2020 Jan 16
PMID 31938404
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study was retrospectively performed to analyze correlations between clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer (CRC) and mutations in , , and in Chinese patients, and to assess the importance of detecting additional mutations in exons 3 and 4 and in patients with CRC. ( and ) and mutations were detected in 715 and 655 patients respectively. The mutation rate of ( or ) was 45.6% (326/715). exon 2 mutations were evaluated in 36.6% of patients (262/715). Additional mutations in exons occurred in 9.0% of patients (64/715), including exons 3 and 4 in 5.6% (40/715) and exons 2, 3, or 4 in 3.4% (24/715). Among 453 patients with wild-type exon 2, 14.1% (64/453) had other mutations in exons. The most frequent sites of mutations were codons 12, 13, 61, and 146 in and codons 12 and 61 in . The mutation rate of (exon 15) was 4.0% (26/655), and the most frequent mutation site was codon 600. Among 440 patients with CRC who had a primary tumor resection at our center, those with mucinous or signet ring cell CRC were more likely to harbor mutations than those with adenocarcinoma (62.7% vs. 43.6%, P=0.006 and 59.3% vs. 39.6%, P=0.004, respectively). Female patients had a higher (exon 15) mutation rate than male patients (5.1% vs. 1.1%, P=0.017). Detection of both and mutations is useful for selecting patients who will benefit from anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapy. mutations were more frequent in patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma/signet ring cell CRC, whereas mutations were more common in female patients with CRC.

Citing Articles

Role of RAS signaling in ovarian cancer.

Therachiyil L, Anand A, Azmi A, Bhat A, Korashy H, Uddin S F1000Res. 2022; 11:1253.

PMID: 36451660 PMC: 9669513. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.126337.1.

References
1.
Piton N, Lonchamp E, Nowak F, Sabourin J . Real-Life Distribution of KRAS and NRAS Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma from French Routine Genotyping. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015; 24(9):1416-8. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0059. View

2.
Yokota T, Ura T, Shibata N, Takahari D, Shitara K, Nomura M . BRAF mutation is a powerful prognostic factor in advanced and recurrent colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2011; 104(5):856-62. PMC: 3048210. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2011.19. View

3.
Douillard J, Rong A, Sidhu R . RAS mutations in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(22):2159-60. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMc1312697. View

4.
Dahabreh I, Terasawa T, Castaldi P, Trikalinos T . Systematic review: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatment effect modification by KRAS mutations in advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 154(1):37-49. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-1-201101040-00006. View

5.
Vaughn C, Zobell S, Furtado L, Baker C, Samowitz W . Frequency of KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS mutations in colorectal cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2011; 50(5):307-12. DOI: 10.1002/gcc.20854. View