» Articles » PMID: 31936030

Neuromuscular Mechanisms Underlying Changes in Force Production During an Attentional Focus Task

Overview
Journal Brain Sci
Publisher MDPI
Date 2020 Jan 16
PMID 31936030
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We examined the effects of attentional focus cues on maximal voluntary force output of the elbow flexors and the underlying physiological mechanisms. Eleven males participated in two randomized experimental sessions. In each session, four randomized blocks of three maximal voluntary contractions (MVC) were performed. The blocks consisted of two externally and two internally attentional focus cued blocks. In one of the sessions, corticospinal excitability (CSE) was measured. During the stimulation session transcranial magnetic, transmastoid and Erb's point stimulations were used to induce motor evoked potentials (MEPs), cervicomedullary MEP (CMEPs) and maximal muscle action potential (Mmax), respectively in the biceps brachii. Across both sessions forces were lower ( 0.024 under the internal (282.4 ± 60.3 N) compared to the external condition (310.7 ± 11.3 N). Muscle co-activation was greater ( = 0.016) under the internal (26.3 ± 11.5%) compared with the external condition (21.5 ± 9.4%). There was no change in CSE. Across both sessions, force measurements were lower ( 0.033 during the stimulation (279.0 ± 47.1 N) compared with the no-stimulation session (314.1 ± 57.5 N). In conclusion, external focus increased force, likely due to reduced co-activation. Stimulating the corticospinal pathway may confound attentional focus. The stimulations may distract participants from the cues and/or disrupt areas of the cortex responsible for attention and focus.

Citing Articles

The Influence of Resistance Training Experience on the Efficacy of Motor Imagery for Acutely Increasing Corticospinal Excitability.

Parsowith E, Stock M, Girts R, Beausejour J, Alberto A, Carr J Brain Sci. 2023; 13(12).

PMID: 38137083 PMC: 10742069. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13121635.


External and internal focus of attention differentially modulate corticospinal excitability in anticipatory postural adjustments.

Matsumoto A, Ueda H, Ogawa A, Oshima C, Irie K, Liang N Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):22385.

PMID: 36572719 PMC: 9792519. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26987-1.


Effects of Attentional Focus on Muscular Endurance: A Meta-Analysis.

Grgic J, Mikulic P Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(1).

PMID: 35010348 PMC: 8751186. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010089.


Acute and Long-Term Effects of Attentional Focus Strategies on Muscular Strength: A Meta-Analysis.

Grgic J, Mikulic I, Mikulic P Sports (Basel). 2021; 9(11).

PMID: 34822352 PMC: 8622562. DOI: 10.3390/sports9110153.

References
1.
Benedek M, Schickel R, Jauk E, Fink A, Neubauer A . Alpha power increases in right parietal cortex reflects focused internal attention. Neuropsychologia. 2014; 56:393-400. PMC: 3989020. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.010. View

2.
Marchant D, Greig M, Scott C . Attentional focusing instructions influence force production and muscular activity during isokinetic elbow flexions. J Strength Cond Res. 2009; 23(8):2358-66. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181b8d1e5. View

3.
Mukaka M . Statistics corner: A guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2013; 24(3):69-71. PMC: 3576830. View

4.
Calder K, Hall L, Lester S, Inglis J, Gabriel D . Reliability of the biceps brachii M-wave. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2005; 2:33. PMC: 1334194. DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-2-33. View

5.
McNeil C, Butler J, Taylor J, Gandevia S . Testing the excitability of human motoneurons. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:152. PMC: 3633937. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00152. View