Attention Influences the Excitability of Cortical Motor Areas in Healthy Humans

Overview

Journal Exp Brain Res

Specialty Neurology

Date 2007 May 23

PMID 17516055

Citations 40

Authors

Antonella Conte

Francesca Gilio

Ennio Iezzi

Vittorio Frasca

Maurizio Inghilleri

Alfredo Berardelli

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

We investigated whether human attentional processes influence the size of the motor evoked potentials (MEP) facilitation and the duration of the cortical silent period (CSP) elicited by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). In healthy subjects we assessed the effects of 5 Hz-rTMS, delivered in trains of 10 stimuli at suprathreshold intensity over the hand motor area, on the MEP size and CSP duration in different attention-demanding conditions: "relaxed," "target hand," and "non-target hand" condition. We also investigated the inhibitory effects of 1 Hz-rTMS conditioning to the premotor cortex on the 5 Hz-rTMS induced MEP facilitation. F-waves evoked by ulnar nerve stimulation were also recorded. rTMS trains elicited a larger MEP size facilitation when the subjects looked at the target hand whereas the increase in CSP duration during rTMS remained unchanged during the three attention-demanding conditions. The conditioning inhibitory stimulation delivered to the premotor cortex decreased the MEP facilitation during the "target hand" condition, leaving the MEP facilitation during the other conditions unchanged. None of the attentional conditions elicited changes in the F wave. In healthy subjects attentional processes influence the size of the MEP facilitation elicited by high-frequency rTMS and do so through premotor-to-motor connections.

Citing Articles

Central mechanisms of muscle tone regulation: implications for pain and performance.

Cacciatore T, Anderson D, Cohen R Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1511783.

PMID: 39717699 PMC: 11665217. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1511783.

Effects of divided attention on movement-related cortical potential in community-dwelling elderly adults: A preliminary study.

Hirano D, Wada M, Kimura N, Jinnai D, Goto Y, Taniguchi T Heliyon. 2024; 10(13):e34126.

PMID: 39071682 PMC: 11283040. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34126.

The behavioral and neural effects of parietal theta burst stimulation on the grasp network are stronger during a grasping task than at rest.

Goldenkoff E, Deluisi J, Destiny D, Lee T, Michon K, Brissenden J Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1198222.

PMID: 37954875 PMC: 10637360. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1198222.

Lateral Prefrontal Stimulation of Active Cortex With Theta Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Affects Subsequent Engagement of the Frontoparietal Network.

Taylor S, Gu P, Simmonite M, Lasagna C, Tso I, Lee T Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2023; 9(2):235-244.

PMID: 37918508 PMC: 10922157. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2023.10.005.

Different effects of I-wave periodicity repetitive TMS on motor cortex interhemispheric interaction.

Tian D, Izumi S Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1079432.

PMID: 37457007 PMC: 10349661. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1079432.

References

Murase N, Rothwell J, Kaji R, Urushihara R, Nakamura K, Murayama N . Subthreshold low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the premotor cortex modulates writer's cramp. Brain. 2004; 128(Pt 1):104-15. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awh315. View

Inghilleri M, Conte A, Frasca V, Gilio F, Lorenzano C, Berardelli A . Synaptic potentiation induced by rTMS: effect of lidocaine infusion. Exp Brain Res. 2005; 163(1):114-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2225-x. View

Gerschlager W, Siebner H, Rothwell J . Decreased corticospinal excitability after subthreshold 1 Hz rTMS over lateral premotor cortex. Neurology. 2001; 57(3):449-55. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.57.3.449. View

Fink G, Frackowiak R, Pietrzyk U, Passingham R . Multiple nonprimary motor areas in the human cortex. J Neurophysiol. 1997; 77(4):2164-74. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.4.2164. View

Rizzo V, Siebner H, Modugno N, Pesenti A, Munchau A, Gerschlager W . Shaping the excitability of human motor cortex with premotor rTMS. J Physiol. 2003; 554(Pt 2):483-95. PMC: 1664763. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.048777. View

Jueptner M, Stephan K, Frith C, Brooks D, Frackowiak R, Passingham R . Anatomy of motor learning. I. Frontal cortex and attention to action. J Neurophysiol. 1997; 77(3):1313-24. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.77.3.1313. View

Starr A, Caramia M, Zarola F, Rossini P . Enhancement of motor cortical excitability in humans by non-invasive electrical stimulation appears prior to voluntary movement. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988; 70(1):26-32. DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90191-5. View

Stefan K, Wycislo M, Classen J . Modulation of associative human motor cortical plasticity by attention. J Neurophysiol. 2004; 92(1):66-72. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00383.2003. View

Lorenzano C, Gilio F, Inghilleri M, Conte A, Fofi L, Manfredi M . Spread of electrical activity at cortical level after repetitive magnetic stimulation in normal subjects. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 147(2):186-92. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1237-z. View

10.

Li S, Latash M, Zatsiorsky V . Effects of motor imagery on finger force responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004; 20(2):273-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.003. View

11.

Munchau A, Bloem B, Irlbacher K, Trimble M, Rothwell J . Functional connectivity of human premotor and motor cortex explored with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(2):554-61. PMC: 6758651. View

12.

Eysenck H, Thompson W . The effects of distraction on pursuit rotor learning, performance and reminiscence. Br J Psychol. 1966; 57(1):99-106. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1966.tb01009.x. View

13.

Cooke S, Bliss T . Plasticity in the human central nervous system. Brain. 2006; 129(Pt 7):1659-73. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awl082. View

14.

Botvinick M, Cohen J . Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature. 1998; 391(6669):756. DOI: 10.1038/35784. View

15.

Gandevia S, Rothwell J . Knowledge of motor commands and the recruitment of human motoneurons. Brain. 1987; 110 ( Pt 5):1117-30. DOI: 10.1093/brain/110.5.1117. View

16.

Jennum P, WINKEL H, Fuglsang-Frederiksen A . Repetitive magnetic stimulation and motor evoked potentials. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995; 97(2):96-101. DOI: 10.1016/0924-980x(94)00293-g. View

17.

Hazeltine E, Grafton S, Ivry R . Attention and stimulus characteristics determine the locus of motor-sequence encoding. A PET study. Brain. 1997; 120 ( Pt 1):123-40. DOI: 10.1093/brain/120.1.123. View

18.

Rowe J, Friston K, Frackowiak R, Passingham R . Attention to action: specific modulation of corticocortical interactions in humans. Neuroimage. 2002; 17(2):988-98. View

19.

Boyle R, Goldberg J, Highstein S . Inputs from regularly and irregularly discharging vestibular nerve afferents to secondary neurons in squirrel monkey vestibular nuclei. III. Correlation with vestibulospinal and vestibuloocular output pathways. J Neurophysiol. 1992; 68(2):471-84. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1992.68.2.471. View

20.

Stinear C, Byblow W, Steyvers M, Levin O, Swinnen S . Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability. Exp Brain Res. 2005; 168(1-2):157-64. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0078-y. View