» Articles » PMID: 31930085

Hybrid Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging 3D Printed Models for Neurosurgery Planning

Overview
Journal Ann Transl Med
Date 2020 Jan 14
PMID 31930085
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the last decade, the clinical applications of three-dimensional (3D) printed models, in the neurosurgery field among others, have expanded widely based on several technical improvements in 3D printers, an increased variety of materials, but especially in postprocessing software. More commonly, physical models are obtained from a unique imaging technique with potential utilization in presurgical planning, generation/creation of patient-specific surgical material and personalized prosthesis or implants. Using specific software solutions, it is possible to obtain a more accurate segmentation of different anatomical and pathological structures and a more precise registration between different medical image sources allowing generating hybrid computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 3D printed models. The need of neurosurgeons for a better understanding of the complex anatomy of central nervous system (CNS) and spine is pushing the use of these hybrid models, which are able to combine morphological information from CT and MRI, and also able to add physiological data from advanced MRI sequences, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), perfusion weighted imaging (PWI) and functional MRI (fMRI). The inclusion of physiopathological data from advanced MRI sequences enables neurosurgeons to identify those areas with increased biological aggressiveness within a certain lesion prior to surgery or biopsy procedures. Preliminary data support the use of this more accurate presurgical perspective, to select the better surgical approach, reduce the global length of surgery and minimize the rate of intraoperative complications, morbidities or patient recovery times after surgery. The use of 3D printed models in neurosurgery has also demonstrated to be a valid tool for surgeons training and to improve communication between specialists and patients. Further studies are needed to test the feasibility of this novel approach in common clinical practice and determine the degree of improvement the neurosurgeons receive and the potential impact on patient outcome.

Citing Articles

Impact of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging registration on rehabilitation after percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar stenosis: Retrospective study.

Guo X, Chen J, Liu J, Jin J World J Orthop. 2024; 15(10):939-949.

PMID: 39473518 PMC: 11514552. DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v15.i10.939.


Narrative review of patient-specific 3D visualization and reality technologies in skull base neurosurgery: enhancements in surgical training, planning, and navigation.

Isikay I, Cekic E, Baylarov B, Tunc O, Hanalioglu S Front Surg. 2024; 11:1427844.

PMID: 39081485 PMC: 11287220. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1427844.


Quantitative assessment and objective improvement of the accuracy of neurosurgical planning through digital patient-specific 3D models.

Hanalioglu S, Gurses M, Baylarov B, Tunc O, Isikay I, Cagiltay N Front Surg. 2024; 11:1386091.

PMID: 38721022 PMC: 11076751. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1386091.


The Integration of 3D Virtual Reality and 3D Printing Technology as Innovative Approaches to Preoperative Planning in Neuro-Oncology.

Gonzalez-Lopez P, Kuptsov A, Gomez-Revuelta C, Fernandez-Villa J, Abarca-Olivas J, Daniel R J Pers Med. 2024; 14(2).

PMID: 38392620 PMC: 10890029. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14020187.


The Inner Complexities of Multimodal Medical Data: Bitmap-Based 3D Printing for Surgical Planning Using Dynamic Physiology.

Jacobson N, Brusilovsky J, Ducey R, Stence N, Barker A, Mitchell M 3D Print Addit Manuf. 2023; 10(5):855-868.

PMID: 37886401 PMC: 10599423. DOI: 10.1089/3dp.2022.0265.


References
1.
Ahmed A, Pennington Z, Molina C, Xia Y, Goodwin C, Sciubba D . Multidisciplinary surgical planning for en bloc resection of malignant primary cervical spine tumors involving 3D-printed models and neoadjuvant therapies: report of 2 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019; 30(4):424-431. DOI: 10.3171/2018.9.SPINE18607. View

2.
Mandrycky C, Wang Z, Kim K, Kim D . 3D bioprinting for engineering complex tissues. Biotechnol Adv. 2016; 34(4):422-434. PMC: 4879088. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.011. View

3.
Clifton W, Nottmeier E, Damon A, Dove C, Chen S, Pichelmann M . A Feasibility Study for the Production of Three-dimensional-printed Spine Models Using Simultaneously Extruded Thermoplastic Polymers. Cureus. 2019; 11(4):e4440. PMC: 6561520. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.4440. View

4.
Wang Y, Li C, Zhu T, Zhang J . Multimodal brain tumor image segmentation using WRN-PPNet. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2019; 75:56-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2019.04.001. View

5.
Fischl B, van der Kouwe A, Destrieux C, Halgren E, Segonne F, Salat D . Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex. 2003; 14(1):11-22. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhg087. View