» Articles » PMID: 31929046

Development of Efficient Electroactive Biofilm in Urine-fed Microbial Fuel Cell Cascades for Bioelectricity Generation

Overview
Date 2020 Jan 14
PMID 31929046
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Microbial fuel cell (MFC) technology harnesses the potential of some naturally occurring bacteria for electricity generation. Digested sludge is commonly used as the inoculum to initiate the process. There are, however, health hazards and practical issues associated with the use of digested sludge depending on its origin as well as the location for system deployment. This work reports the development of an efficient electroactive bacterial community within ceramic-based MFCs fed with human urine in the absence of sludge inoculum. The results show the development of a uniform bacterial community with power output levels equal to or higher than those generated from MFCs inoculated with sludge. In this case, the power generation begins within 2 days of the experimental set-up, compared to about 5 days in some sludge-inoculated MFCs, thus significantly reducing the start-up time. The metagenomics analysis of the successfully formed electroactive biofilm (EAB) shows significant shifts between the microbial ecology of the feeding material (fresh urine) and the developed anodic biofilm. A total of 21 bacteria genera were detected in the urine feedstock whilst up to 35 different genera were recorded in the developed biofilm. Members of Pseudomonas (18%) and Anaerolineaceae (17%) dominate the bacterial community of the fresh urine feed while members of Burkholderiaceae (up to 50%) and Tissierella (up to 29%) dominate the anodic EAB. These results highlight a significant shift in the bacterial community of the feedstock towards a selection and adaptation required for the various electrochemical reactions essential for survival through power generation.

Citing Articles

Influence of carbon-based cathodes on biofilm composition and electrochemical performance in soil microbial fuel cells.

Nandy A, Farkas D, Pepio-Tarrega B, Martinez-Crespiera S, Borras E, Avignone-Rossa C Environ Sci Ecotechnol. 2023; 16:100276.

PMID: 37206316 PMC: 10189395. DOI: 10.1016/j.ese.2023.100276.


Recent progress in microbial fuel cells using substrates from diverse sources.

Sonawane J, Mahadevan R, Pandey A, Greener J Heliyon. 2022; 8(12):e12353.

PMID: 36582703 PMC: 9792797. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12353.


Coproduction and enhancement of electricity and biobutanol using adsorption carrier solid-state fermentation.

Feng X, Wang L, Chen H Biotechnol Biofuels Bioprod. 2022; 15(1):42.

PMID: 35501839 PMC: 9063184. DOI: 10.1186/s13068-022-02138-6.


Microbial fuel cells and their electrified biofilms.

Greenman J, Gajda I, You J, Mendis B, Obata O, Pasternak G Biofilm. 2021; 3:100057.

PMID: 34729468 PMC: 8543385. DOI: 10.1016/j.bioflm.2021.100057.


Impact of selected environmental factors on microbiome of the digestive tract of ruminants.

Cholewinska P, Gorniak W, Wojnarowski K BMC Vet Res. 2021; 17(1):25.

PMID: 33419429 PMC: 7796543. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-021-02742-y.


References
1.
Kalyuzhnaya M, De Marco P, Bowerman S, Pacheco C, Lara J, Lidstrom M . Methyloversatilis universalis gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel taxon within the Betaproteobacteria represented by three methylotrophic isolates. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006; 56(Pt 11):2517-2522. DOI: 10.1099/ijs.0.64422-0. View

2.
Lucker S, Wagner M, Maixner F, Pelletier E, Koch H, Vacherie B . A Nitrospira metagenome illuminates the physiology and evolution of globally important nitrite-oxidizing bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(30):13479-84. PMC: 2922143. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1003860107. View

3.
Johnson E, Heaver S, Walters W, Ley R . Microbiome and metabolic disease: revisiting the bacterial phylum Bacteroidetes. J Mol Med (Berl). 2016; 95(1):1-8. PMC: 5187364. DOI: 10.1007/s00109-016-1492-2. View

4.
Park Y, Cho H, Yu J, Min B, Kim H, Kim B . Response of microbial community structure to pre-acclimation strategies in microbial fuel cells for domestic wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol. 2017; 233:176-183. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.101. View

5.
Ajayi F, Weigele P . A terracotta bio-battery. Bioresour Technol. 2012; 116:86-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.04.019. View