» Articles » PMID: 31874108

Genomics of Lethal Prostate Cancer at Diagnosis and Castration Resistance

Abstract

The genomics of primary prostate cancer differ from those of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We studied genomic aberrations in primary prostate cancer biopsies from patients who developed mCRPC, also studying matching, same-patient, diagnostic, and mCRPC biopsies following treatment. We profiled 470 treatment-naive prostate cancer diagnostic biopsies and, for 61 cases, mCRPC biopsies, using targeted and low-pass whole-genome sequencing (n = 52). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize mutation and copy number profile. Prevalence was compared using Fisher's exact test. Survival correlations were studied using log-rank test. TP53 (27%) and PTEN (12%) and DDR gene defects (BRCA2 7%; CDK12 5%; ATM 4%) were commonly detected. TP53, BRCA2, and CDK12 mutations were markedly more common than described in the TCGA cohort. Patients with RB1 loss in the primary tumor had a worse prognosis. Among 61 men with matched hormone-naive and mCRPC biopsies, differences were identified in AR, TP53, RB1, and PI3K/AKT mutational status between same-patient samples. In conclusion, the genomics of diagnostic prostatic biopsies acquired from men who develop mCRPC differ from those of the nonlethal primary prostatic cancers. RB1/TP53/AR aberrations are enriched in later stages, but the prevalence of DDR defects in diagnostic samples is similar to mCRPC.

Citing Articles

TP53 Deficiency in the Natural History of Prostate Cancer.

Ofner H, Kramer G, Shariat S, Hassler M Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40002239 PMC: 11853097. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17040645.


Distinct outcomes from targeted perturbations of the multi-subunit SCF E3 ubiquitin ligase in blocking Trp53/Rb1-null prostate tumorigenesis.

Xue Y, Zhu L, Karan S, Locker J, Branch C, Zhang J Commun Biol. 2025; 8(1):278.

PMID: 39987265 PMC: 11846996. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-025-07662-3.


Homologous recombination repair status in metastatic prostate cancer by next-generation sequencing and functional immunofluorescence.

Arce-Gallego S, Cresta Morgado P, Delgado-Serrano L, Simonetti S, Gonzalez M, Romero-Lozano P Cell Rep Med. 2025; 6(2):101937.

PMID: 39914385 PMC: 11866514. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.101937.


Deciphering Complexity: The Molecular Landscape of Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Fanelli G, Nuzzo P, Pederzoli F, Loda M Surg Pathol Clin. 2025; 18(1):25-39.

PMID: 39890307 PMC: 11787547. DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2024.10.003.


The Emerging Predictive and Prognostic Role of Aggressive-Variant-Associated Tumor Suppressor Genes Across Prostate Cancer Stages.

Pedrani M, Barizzi J, Salfi G, Nepote A, Testi I, Merler S Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(1.

PMID: 39796175 PMC: 11719667. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26010318.


References
1.
Fraser M, Sabelnykova V, Yamaguchi T, Heisler L, Livingstone J, Huang V . Genomic hallmarks of localized, non-indolent prostate cancer. Nature. 2017; 541(7637):359-364. DOI: 10.1038/nature20788. View

2.
Boutros P, Fraser M, Harding N, De Borja R, Trudel D, Lalonde E . Spatial genomic heterogeneity within localized, multifocal prostate cancer. Nat Genet. 2015; 47(7):736-45. DOI: 10.1038/ng.3315. View

3.
Boysen G, Barbieri C, Prandi D, Blattner M, Chae S, Dahija A . SPOP mutation leads to genomic instability in prostate cancer. Elife. 2015; 4. PMC: 4621745. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.09207. View

4.
Henzler C, Li Y, Yang R, McBride T, Ho Y, Sprenger C . Truncation and constitutive activation of the androgen receptor by diverse genomic rearrangements in prostate cancer. Nat Commun. 2016; 7:13668. PMC: 5141345. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms13668. View

5.
Seed G, Yuan W, Mateo J, Carreira S, Bertan C, Lambros M . Gene Copy Number Estimation from Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing of Prostate Cancer Biopsies: Analytic Validation and Clinical Qualification. Clin Cancer Res. 2017; 23(20):6070-6077. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0972. View