» Articles » PMID: 31858340

What Do Australian Patients with Inflammatory Arthritis Value in Treatment? A Discrete Choice Experiment

Overview
Journal Clin Rheumatol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2019 Dec 21
PMID 31858340
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: The purpose of this study was to develop an understanding of treatment preferences in patients with inflammatory arthritis (IA) [rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA)] focussing on treatment attributes that patients' value, their relative importance, and the risk-benefit trade-offs that characterise patients' choices around treatment.

Methods: A discrete choice experiment (DCE) approach was used. Attributes of interest were clinical efficacy; slowing of disease progression; risk of mild-moderate side effects; risk of severe side effects; frequency of administration; real-world product evidence; management of related conditions; and availability of a patient support programme. Using data from the DCE component, a restricted latent class model (LCM) was estimated to determine discrete 'classes' of treatment preferences.

Results: In this analysis, 206 participants were included (AS n = 59; PsA n = 62; RA n = 85). Two classes were identified. For 'class 1' (59.9%), the most important attributes (across all treatment modalities) were preventing disease progression, clinical efficacy and risk of mild-to-moderate side effects. For 'class 2' (40.1%), clinical and non-clinical attributes were important, and attribute importance depended on treatment modality. Patient demographic and treatment characteristics did not predict class membership.

Conclusion: For most patients with IA, clinical efficacy, stopping disease progression and risks of mild-to-moderate side effects are important treatment attributes. Patients with prior biologic DMARD experience had greater preference for injection treatments. For a subset of patients, patient support programmes and the frequency of administration were important. Clinicians should be mindful of preferences when prescribing treatment to patients with IA.Key Points• Most patients consider clinical efficacy, stopping disease progression and the risk of mild-to-moderate side effects as important treatment attributes• Patients with prior biologic DMARD experience have greater preference for injection treatments.• For a subset of patients, patient support programmes, and the frequency of administration were important.• Clinicians should be mindful of preferences when prescribing treatment to patients with IA.

Citing Articles

Understanding the experience, treatment preferences and goals of people living with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in Australia.

Fifer S, Godsell J, Opat S, Hamad N, Lasica M, Forsyth C BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):831.

PMID: 38992616 PMC: 11241996. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12589-9.


What benefit-risk trade-offs are acceptable to rheumatoid arthritis patients during treatment selection? Evidence from a multicountry choice experiment.

Alten R, Nieto-Gonzalez J, Jacques P, Montecucco C, Moots R, Radner H RMD Open. 2024; 10(1).

PMID: 38199605 PMC: 10806488. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003311.


Factors influencing choice of b/ts DMARDs in managing inflammatory arthritis from a patient perspective: a systematic review of global evidence and a patient-based survey from Hong Kong.

Li Y, Lau L, Peng K, Zhang D, Dong D, Wong I BMJ Open. 2023; 13(10):e069681.

PMID: 37827733 PMC: 10583073. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069681.


Dynamics of Patient-Based Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines in Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review.

El Masri H, McGuire T, Van Driel M, Benham H, Hollingworth S Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022; 16:2609-2637.

PMID: 36164323 PMC: 9508999. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S375062.


Understanding the Treatment Preferences of People Living with Schizophrenia in Australia; A Patient Value Mapping Study.

Fifer S, Keen B, Newton R, Puig A, McGeachie M Patient Prefer Adherence. 2022; 16:1687-1701.

PMID: 35898923 PMC: 9309312. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S366522.


References
1.
Borse R, Brown C, Muszbek N, Chaudhary M, Kachroo S . Cost-Effectiveness of Golimumab in Ankylosing Spondylitis from the UK Payer Perspective. Rheumatol Ther. 2017; 4(2):427-443. PMC: 5696295. DOI: 10.1007/s40744-017-0083-1. View

2.
Hoving J, Bartelds G, Sluiter J, Sadiraj K, Groot I, Lems W . Perceived work ability, quality of life, and fatigue in patients with rheumatoid arthritis after a 6-month course of TNF inhibitors: prospective intervention study and partial economic evaluation. Scand J Rheumatol. 2009; 38(4):246-50. DOI: 10.1080/03009740902748264. View

3.
Wcislo-Dziadecka D, Zbiciak-Nylec M, Brzezinska-Wcislo L, Mazurek U . TNF-α in a molecularly targeted therapy of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Postgrad Med J. 2016; 92(1085):172-8. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2015-133419. View

4.
Alten R, Kruger K, Rellecke J, Schiffner-Rohe J, Behmer O, Schiffhorst G . Examining patient preferences in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis using a discrete-choice approach. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016; 10:2217-2228. PMC: 5098563. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S117774. View

5.
Augustovski F, Beratarrechea A, Irazola V, Rubinstein F, Tesolin P, Gonzalez J . Patient preferences for biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis: a discrete-choice experiment. Value Health. 2013; 16(2):385-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.11.007. View