» Articles » PMID: 27843301

Examining Patient Preferences in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis Using a Discrete-choice Approach

Overview
Date 2016 Nov 16
PMID 27843301
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) used in second-line treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are administered parenterally. However, so-called targeted synthetic DMARDs (tsDMARDs) - developed more recently - offer alternative (ie, oral) administration forms in second-line treatment. Since bDMARDs and tsDMARDs can be regarded as equal in terms of efficacy, the present study examines whether such characteristics as route of administration drive RA patients' treatment choice. This may ultimately suggest superiority of some second-line DMARDs over equally effective options, at least according to RA-patient preferences.

Objective: The current study assessed the importance of oral administration among other treatment characteristics differing between available second-line DMARDs for RA patients' preferences using a discrete-choice experiment (DCE).

Materials And Methods: The DCE involved scenarios of three hypothetical treatment options in a -efficient design with varying levels of key attributes (route and frequency of administration, time till onset of drug effect, combination therapy, possible side effects), as defined by focus groups. Further patient characteristics were recorded by an accompanying questionnaire. In the DCE, patients were asked to choose best and worst options (best-worst scaling). Results were analyzed by count analysis and adjusted regression analysis.

Results: A total of 1,588 subjects completed the DCE and were eligible for final analyses. Across all characteristics included in the DCE, "oral administration" was most desired and "intravenous infusion" was most strongly rejected. This was followed by "no combination with methotrexate" being strongly preferred and "intake every 1-2 weeks" being strongly rejected. On average, levels of route of administration showed strongest influences on patients' decisions in post hoc bootstrapping analysis.

Conclusion: According to the results, an oral DMARD that does not have to be combined with methotrexate and is not administered (only) every 1-2 weeks appears a highly favorable treatment option for patients with RA. DMARDs meeting these preferences may increase compliance and adherence in RA treatment.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with active ankylosing spondylitis refractory to biologic therapy: 2-year clinical and radiographic results from the open-label extension of the SELECT-AXIS 2 study.

Baraliakos X, van der Heijde D, Sieper J, Inman R, Kameda H, Maksymowych W Arthritis Res Ther. 2024; 26(1):197.

PMID: 39533349 PMC: 11556075. DOI: 10.1186/s13075-024-03412-8.


Preferences for Tapering Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs Among People With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Chan S, Stamp L, Treharne G, Cheung J, Dalbeth N, Grainger R Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024; 77(3):349-358.

PMID: 39308004 PMC: 11848995. DOI: 10.1002/acr.25437.


Preference for a Novel Oral Alternative to Parenterally Administered Medications.

Myers J, Dam J, Imran M, Hashim M, Dhalla A Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024; 18:1547-1562.

PMID: 39100431 PMC: 11298207. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S463354.


Barriers to, Facilitators of, and Interventions to Support Treat-to-Target Implementation in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review.

Gossec L, Bessette L, Xavier R, Favalli E, Ostor A, Buch M Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2024; 76(12):1626-1636.

PMID: 39090845 PMC: 11605793. DOI: 10.1002/acr.25408.


Long-term sustainability of response to upadacitinib among patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biological treatments: results up to 5 years from SELECT-BEYOND.

van Vollenhoven R, Hall S, Wells A, Meerwein S, Song Y, Tanjinatus O RMD Open. 2024; 10(3.

PMID: 39053948 PMC: 11284904. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-004037.


References
1.
Yazici Y . Abatacept versus other biologics in methotrexate inadequate responders with rheumatoid arthritis: you like tomato and I like tomahto... let's call the whole thing off. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012; 14(1):104. PMC: 3392802. DOI: 10.1186/ar3688. View

2.
Horne R, Weinman J . Patients' beliefs about prescribed medicines and their role in adherence to treatment in chronic physical illness. J Psychosom Res. 2000; 47(6):555-67. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3999(99)00057-4. View

3.
Flynn T, Louviere J, Peters T, Coast J . Best--worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it. J Health Econ. 2006; 26(1):171-89. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.04.002. View

4.
Anderson J, Caplan L, Yazdany J, Robbins M, Neogi T, Michaud K . Rheumatoid arthritis disease activity measures: American College of Rheumatology recommendations for use in clinical practice. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2012; 64(5):640-7. PMC: 4028066. DOI: 10.1002/acr.21649. View

5.
Fraenkel L, Bogardus S, Concato J, Felson D . Unwillingness of rheumatoid arthritis patients to risk adverse effects. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002; 41(3):253-61. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/41.3.253. View