» Articles » PMID: 31857146

Predicting Tubular Reabsorption with a Human Kidney Proximal Tubule Tissue-on-a-chip and Physiologically-based Modeling

Overview
Specialty Toxicology
Date 2019 Dec 21
PMID 31857146
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Kidney is a major route of xenobiotic excretion, but the accuracy of preclinical data for predicting in vivo clearance is limited by species differences and non-physiologic 2D culture conditions. Microphysiological systems can potentially increase predictive accuracy due to their more realistic 3D environment and incorporation of dynamic flow. We used a renal proximal tubule microphysiological device to predict renal reabsorption of five compounds: creatinine (negative control), perfluorooctanoic acid (positive control), cisplatin, gentamicin, and cadmium. We perfused compound-containing media to determine renal uptake/reabsorption, adjusted for non-specific binding. A physiologically-based parallel tube model was used to model reabsorption kinetics and make predictions of overall in vivo renal clearance. For all compounds tested, the kidney tubule chip combined with physiologically-based modeling reproduces qualitatively and quantitatively in vivo tubular reabsorption and clearance. However, because the in vitro device lacks filtration and tubular secretion components, additional information on protein binding and the importance of secretory transport is needed in order to make accurate predictions. These and other limitations, such as the presence of non-physiological compounds such as antibiotics and bovine serum albumin in media and the need to better characterize degree of expression of important transporters, highlight some of the challenges with using microphysiological devices to predict in vivo pharmacokinetics.

Citing Articles

Comparative analysis of the physiological and transport functions of various sources of renal proximal tubule cells under static and fluidic conditions in PhysioMimix T12 platform.

Sakolish C, Moyer H, Tsai H, Ford L, Dickey A, Bajaj P Drug Metab Dispos. 2025; 53(1):100001.

PMID: 39884810 PMC: 11822869. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.124.001488.


Evaluating nephrotoxicity reduction in a novel polymyxin B formulation: insights from a 3D kidney-on-a-chip model.

Payasi A, Yadav M, Chaudhary S, Aggarwal A Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024; 68(10):e0021924.

PMID: 39225483 PMC: 11459911. DOI: 10.1128/aac.00219-24.


Advanced Kidney Models In Vitro Using the Established Cell Line Renal Proximal Tubular Epithelial/Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase1 for Nephrotoxicity Assays.

Lacueva-Aparicio A, Martinez-Gimeno L, Torcal P, Ochoa I, Gimenez I Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(7).

PMID: 39056887 PMC: 11275192. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9070446.


A new tissue-agnostic microfluidic device to model physiology and disease: the lattice platform.

Campo H, Zha D, Pattarawat P, Colina J, Zhang D, Murphy A Lab Chip. 2023; 23(22):4821-4833.

PMID: 37846545 PMC: 11181516. DOI: 10.1039/d3lc00378g.


Organ-on-chip systems as a model for nanomedicine.

Stavrou M, Phung N, Grimm J, Andreou C Nanoscale. 2023; 15(23):9927-9940.

PMID: 37254663 PMC: 10619891. DOI: 10.1039/d3nr01661g.


References
1.
Reece P, Stafford I, Russell J, Gill P . Nonlinear renal clearance of ultrafilterable platinum in patients treated with cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum (II). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1985; 15(3):295-9. DOI: 10.1007/BF00263904. View

2.
Bridges C, Zalups R . Molecular and ionic mimicry and the transport of toxic metals. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2005; 204(3):274-308. PMC: 2409291. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.09.007. View

3.
Wilmes A, Bielow C, Ranninger C, Bellwon P, Aschauer L, Limonciel A . Mechanism of cisplatin proximal tubule toxicity revealed by integrating transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and biokinetics. Toxicol In Vitro. 2014; 30(1 Pt A):117-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2014.10.006. View

4.
MacKay S, Funke A, Buffington D, Humes H . Tissue engineering of a bioartificial renal tubule. ASAIO J. 1998; 44(3):179-83. DOI: 10.1097/00002480-199805000-00011. View

5.
Barr D, Wilder L, Caudill S, Gonzalez A, Needham L, Pirkle J . Urinary creatinine concentrations in the U.S. population: implications for urinary biologic monitoring measurements. Environ Health Perspect. 2005; 113(2):192-200. PMC: 1277864. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.7337. View