» Articles » PMID: 31852082

Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab-based Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Dec 20
PMID 31852082
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To identify the optimal treatment strategy after first-line induction chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing bevacizumab-based maintenance therapy, observation, and continuous chemotherapy.We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant articles published through March 2018. All randomized phase-III trials evaluating bevacizumab-based maintenance treatment after bevacizumab-based induction treatment were eligible for inclusion. The primary and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or data for calculating HRs with 95% CIs were extracted. The RevMan v5.3 (Copenhagen, Denmark) software was used for data analysis.

Results: Nine trials (3121 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with observation alone, bevacizumab-based maintenance therapy significantly improved PFS (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.47-0.82) and showed a trend toward prolonged OS (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.83-1.05). The incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity, including hypertension and fatigue, was higher after maintenance therapy than after observation alone. PFS (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.70-1.18) and OS (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.74-1.04) did not differ between the maintenance treatment and continuous chemotherapy groups. Grade 3/4 toxicity, including diarrhea and sensory neuropathy, was less common after maintenance therapy than after continuous chemotherapy.

Conclusion: Bevacizumab-based maintenance therapy significantly improved PFS, showed a trend toward prolonged OS, and reduced cumulative grade 3/4 toxicity relative to continuous chemotherapy with comparable efficacy. Although maintenance therapy was beneficial, the optimal strategy should be individualized.

Citing Articles

Metastatic Colon Cancer - An Effective Treatment Protocol of Integrative Therapies Including Electromagnetic Field Frequencies: A Case Report.

Ried K, Eng P, Binjemain T Case Rep Oncol. 2023; 16(1):1324-1334.

PMID: 37942404 PMC: 10629860. DOI: 10.1159/000534628.


A Real-World Retrospective Study to Evaluate the Reliability of Cetuximab plus Capecitabine versus Capecitabine as Maintenance Therapy in Patients with RAS and BRAF Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Li J, Zhang H, Guo X, Dong S, Li Y, Huang W Med Princ Pract. 2023; 33(1):31-40.

PMID: 37725905 PMC: 10896611. DOI: 10.1159/000533528.


Risk of retinal vein occlusion in colorectal cancer patients receiving anti-vascular endothelial growth factors - a population-based cohort study.

Annabelle Lee W, Chung W, Shao S, Lai E, Chen Y, Ho C BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):545.

PMID: 37316803 PMC: 10265868. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11037-4.


Real-Life Effectivity of Dose Intensity Reduction of First-Line mFOLFIRI-Based Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancers: Sometimes Less Is More.

Pecsi B, Mangel L Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(1):908-922.

PMID: 36661718 PMC: 9857654. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010069.


Antiangiogenic Drug-Induced Proteinuria as a Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Moisuc D, Marinca M, Gafton B, Alexa-Stratulat T, Pavel-Tanasa M, Cianga P Curr Oncol. 2022; 29(6):3996-4011.

PMID: 35735428 PMC: 9221669. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29060319.


References
1.
Fakih M . Metastatic colorectal cancer: current state and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2015; 33(16):1809-24. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.59.7633. View

2.
Simkens L, van Tinteren H, May A, Ten Tije A, Creemers G, Loosveld O . Maintenance treatment with capecitabine and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer (CAIRO3): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Lancet. 2015; 385(9980):1843-52. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62004-3. View

3.
Chibaudel B, Maindrault-Goebel F, Lledo G, Mineur L, Andre T, Bennamoun M . Can chemotherapy be discontinued in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(34):5727-33. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4344. View

4.
Johnsson A, Hagman H, Frodin J, Berglund A, Keldsen N, Fernebro E . A randomized phase III trial on maintenance treatment with bevacizumab alone or in combination with erlotinib after chemotherapy and bevacizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer: the Nordic ACT Trial. Ann Oncol. 2013; 24(9):2335-41. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt236. View

5.
Aparicio T, Ghiringhelli F, Boige V, Le Malicot K, Taieb J, Bouche O . Bevacizumab Maintenance Versus No Maintenance During Chemotherapy-Free Intervals in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial (PRODIGE 9). J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(7):674-681. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.2931. View