Efficacy and Safety of Bevacizumab-based Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: To identify the optimal treatment strategy after first-line induction chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing bevacizumab-based maintenance therapy, observation, and continuous chemotherapy.We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for relevant articles published through March 2018. All randomized phase-III trials evaluating bevacizumab-based maintenance treatment after bevacizumab-based induction treatment were eligible for inclusion. The primary and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or data for calculating HRs with 95% CIs were extracted. The RevMan v5.3 (Copenhagen, Denmark) software was used for data analysis.
Results: Nine trials (3121 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with observation alone, bevacizumab-based maintenance therapy significantly improved PFS (HR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.47-0.82) and showed a trend toward prolonged OS (HR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.83-1.05). The incidence of grade 3/4 toxicity, including hypertension and fatigue, was higher after maintenance therapy than after observation alone. PFS (HR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.70-1.18) and OS (HR: 0.88, 95% CI: 0.74-1.04) did not differ between the maintenance treatment and continuous chemotherapy groups. Grade 3/4 toxicity, including diarrhea and sensory neuropathy, was less common after maintenance therapy than after continuous chemotherapy.
Conclusion: Bevacizumab-based maintenance therapy significantly improved PFS, showed a trend toward prolonged OS, and reduced cumulative grade 3/4 toxicity relative to continuous chemotherapy with comparable efficacy. Although maintenance therapy was beneficial, the optimal strategy should be individualized.
Ried K, Eng P, Binjemain T Case Rep Oncol. 2023; 16(1):1324-1334.
PMID: 37942404 PMC: 10629860. DOI: 10.1159/000534628.
Li J, Zhang H, Guo X, Dong S, Li Y, Huang W Med Princ Pract. 2023; 33(1):31-40.
PMID: 37725905 PMC: 10896611. DOI: 10.1159/000533528.
Annabelle Lee W, Chung W, Shao S, Lai E, Chen Y, Ho C BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):545.
PMID: 37316803 PMC: 10265868. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11037-4.
Pecsi B, Mangel L Curr Oncol. 2023; 30(1):908-922.
PMID: 36661718 PMC: 9857654. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010069.
Antiangiogenic Drug-Induced Proteinuria as a Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.
Moisuc D, Marinca M, Gafton B, Alexa-Stratulat T, Pavel-Tanasa M, Cianga P Curr Oncol. 2022; 29(6):3996-4011.
PMID: 35735428 PMC: 9221669. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29060319.