» Articles » PMID: 25605741

Bevacizumab Continuation Versus No Continuation After First-line Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: a Randomized Phase III Non-inferiority Trial (SAKK 41/06)

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Jan 22
PMID 25605741
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab is a standard option for first-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. We assessed whether no continuation is non-inferior to continuation of bevacizumab after completing first-line chemotherapy.

Patients And Methods: In an open-label, phase III multicentre trial, patients with mCRC without disease progression after 4-6 months of standard first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab were randomly assigned to continuing bevacizumab at a standard dose or no treatment. CT scans were done every 6 weeks until disease progression. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). A non-inferiority limit for hazard ratio (HR) of 0.727 was chosen to detect a difference in TTP of 6 weeks or less, with a one-sided significance level of 10% and a statistical power of 85%.

Results: The intention-to-treat population comprised 262 patients: median follow-up was 36.7 months. The median TTP was 4.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.1-5.4] months for bevacizumab continuation versus 2.9 (95% CI 2.8-3.8) months for no continuation; HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.58-0.96). Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated. The median overall survival was 25.4 months for bevacizumab continuation versus 23.8 months (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.63-1.1; P = 0.2) for no continuation. Severe adverse events were uncommon in the bevacizumab continuation arm. Costs for bevacizumab continuation were estimated to be ∼30,000 USD per patient.

Conclusions: Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated for treatment holidays versus continuing bevacizumab monotheray, after 4-6 months of standard first-line chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Based on no impact on overall survival and increased treatment costs, bevacizumab as a single agent is of no meaningful therapeutic value. More efficient treatment approaches are needed to maintain control of stabilized disease following induction therapy.

Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00544700.

Citing Articles

Cryoablation for treatment of peripheral lung metastases from colorectal cancer: a bicenter retrospective study.

Izaaryene J, Grange R, Habouzit V, Grange S, Orsini B, Dassa M Eur Radiol. 2024; .

PMID: 39572449 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-11153-0.


A two-stage maintenance trial of cetuximab-based treatment in RAS and BRAF wild-type unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective real-world study.

Jiang T, Chen H, Wang X, Lin F, Wang H, Liu J Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1425203.

PMID: 39109286 PMC: 11300202. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1425203.


Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Plus Cetuximab Versus Cetuximab as Maintenance Therapy in First-Line Therapy for and Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Phase III ERMES Study.

Pinto C, Orlandi A, Normanno N, Maiello E, Calegari M, Antonuzzo L J Clin Oncol. 2024; 42(11):1278-1287.

PMID: 38181312 PMC: 11095858. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.01021.


The impact of clinical and translational research on the quality of life during the metastatic colorectal cancer patient journey.

Rodriguez Castells M, Baraibar I, Ros J, Saoudi N, Salva F, Garcia A Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1272561.

PMID: 37909013 PMC: 10614292. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1272561.


Long-Term 5-Year Response to Pembrolizumab, Bevacizumab, and Capecitabine Regimen in a Metastatic Colon Cancer Patient with MSI-High and KRAS Mutation: Case Report.

Julka P, Arya D, Gupta K Case Rep Oncol. 2023; 16(1):1020-1027.

PMID: 37900837 PMC: 10601776. DOI: 10.1159/000533760.