» Articles » PMID: 31831531

Acceptability to Patients of Screening Disposable Transnasal Endoscopy: Qualitative Interview Analysis

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Dec 14
PMID 31831531
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Screening in selected high risk populations for Barrett's oesophagus (BO) and oesophageal varices (OVs) has been proposed, but there are obstacles with conventional oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (C-OGD), including patient acceptability. Portable and disposable office-based transnasal endoscopy (TNE) is a feasible and accurate alternative to C-OGD that may have use in primary and secondary care. This article outlines a qualitative analysis of patient experiences of TNE and C-OGD in order to gain an insight into an acceptable delivery of an endoscopic screening service.

Design: Purposeful sampling identified 23 participants who then underwent semi-structured interviews to determine their experiences of both procedures. Thematic analysis was conducted to derive meaning from their lived experiences.

Setting: A secondary care endoscopy unit, clinic room and interview room.

Participants: Patients referred for BO or OV surveillance and for endoscopy to investigate dyspepsia underwent unsedated TNE using the EG Scan II device followed by C-OGD with or without sedation (patient choice), as part of a clinical trial.

Results: The themes that arose from our analysis were: inclusivity in one's own healthcare, comfort level and convenience, validity of the procedure and application to a screening population and a sense of altruism and reciprocity. Positive aspects of TNE included participant empowerment, reduced discomfort and avoidance of conscious sedation. Participants felt that if TNE screening was of proven efficacy it would be welcomed, though views on use in a community setting were mixed.

Conclusions: Most patients preferred TNE to unsedated C-OGD and the reasons they gave featured strongly in the emerging themes. Preferences between TNE and sedated C-OGD were more subtle, with equivalent comfort scores but merits and drawbacks of both being discussed. This information identifies opportunities and challenges in establishing an endoscopic screening service. ISRCTNregistry identifier: 70595405; Pre-results.

Citing Articles

British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines on sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Sidhu R, Turnbull D, Haboubi H, Leeds J, Healey C, Hebbar S Gut. 2023; 73(2):219-245.

PMID: 37816587 PMC: 10850688. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-330396.


Dutch individuals' views of screening for oesophageal cancer: a focus group study.

Sijben J, Peters Y, Bas S, Siersema P, Rainey L, Broeders M BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2023; 10(1).

PMID: 37257920 PMC: 10254588. DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001136.


Unsedated transnasal endoscopy for the detection of Barrett's esophagus: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Huibertse L, Peters Y, Westendorp D, Siersema P Dis Esophagus. 2022; 36(2).

PMID: 35830873 PMC: 9885739. DOI: 10.1093/dote/doac045.


Public acceptance and uptake of oesophageal adenocarcinoma screening strategies: A mixed-methods systematic review.

Sijben J, Peters Y, van der Velden K, Rainey L, Siersema P, Broeders M EClinicalMedicine. 2022; 46:101367.

PMID: 35399814 PMC: 8987366. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101367.


Diagnostic Ability of High-definition Imaging Using Ultraslim Endoscopes in Early Gastric Cancer.

Sugita T, Suzuki S, Ichijima R, Ogura K, Kusano C, Ikehara H J Gastric Cancer. 2021; 21(3):246-257.

PMID: 34691809 PMC: 8505118. DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2021.21.e23.


References
1.
Garcia-Tsao G, Abraldes J, Berzigotti A, Bosch J . Portal hypertensive bleeding in cirrhosis: Risk stratification, diagnosis, and management: 2016 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2016; 65(1):310-335. DOI: 10.1002/hep.28906. View

2.
Kruijshaar M, Kerkhof M, Siersema P, Steyerberg E, Homs M, Essink-Bot M . The burden of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopy. 2006; 38(9):873-8. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-944613. View

3.
Tripathi D, Stanley A, Hayes P, Patch D, Millson C, Mehrzad H . U.K. guidelines on the management of variceal haemorrhage in cirrhotic patients. Gut. 2015; 64(11):1680-704. PMC: 4680175. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309262. View

4.
Shaheen N, Falk G, Iyer P, Gerson L . ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett's Esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015; 111(1):30-50. PMC: 10245082. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.322. View

5.
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J . Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007; 19(6):349-57. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. View