» Articles » PMID: 28821598

Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: a Position Statement of the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS)

Overview
Journal Gut
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2017 Aug 20
PMID 28821598
Citations 109
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This document represents the first position statement produced by the British Society of Gastroenterology and Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland, setting out the minimum expected standards in diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. The need for this statement has arisen from the recognition that while technical competence can be rapidly acquired, in practice the performance of a high-quality examination is variable, with an unacceptably high rate of failure to diagnose cancer at endoscopy. The importance of detecting early neoplasia has taken on greater significance in this era of minimally invasive, organ-preserving endoscopic therapy. In this position statement we describe 38 recommendations to improve diagnostic endoscopy quality. Our goal is to emphasise practices that encourage mucosal inspection and lesion recognition, with the aim of optimising the early diagnosis of upper gastrointestinal disease and improving patient outcomes.

Citing Articles

Indications and Findings of Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy at a District Hospital in Ghana: A Retrospective Study.

Adjei S, Adjei P Health Sci Rep. 2025; 8(2):e70504.

PMID: 39995800 PMC: 11847709. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70504.


Evaluation of an artificial intelligence-based system for real-time high-quality photodocumentation during esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Ahn B, Lee J, Seol J, Kim J, Chung H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4693.

PMID: 39920187 PMC: 11806067. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-83721-9.


Deep learning model targeting cancer surrounding tissues for accurate cancer diagnosis based on histopathological images.

Li L, Geng Y, Chen T, Lin K, Xie C, Qi J J Transl Med. 2025; 23(1):110.

PMID: 39849586 PMC: 11755804. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-06017-6.


Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Quality Improvement and the Role of Topical Antiperistaltic Agents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Burke E, Harkins P, Arumugasamy M Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73855.

PMID: 39559431 PMC: 11573234. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73855.


The variation in post-endoscopy upper gastrointestinal cancer rates among endoscopy providers in England and associated factors: a population-based study.

Kamran U, Evison F, Morris E, Brookes M, Rutter M, McCord M Endoscopy. 2024; 57(1):17-28.

PMID: 39208876 PMC: 11864345. DOI: 10.1055/a-2378-1464.


References
1.
Lee T, Wang R, Lee Y, Lin J, Ho H, Hsieh M . The Incidence of Gastric Adenocarcinoma Among Patients With Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia: A Long-term Cohort Study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015; 50(7):532-7. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000406. View

2.
Brocchi E, Tomassetti P, Misitano B, EPIFANIO G, Corinaldesi R, Bonvicini F . Endoscopic markers in adult coeliac disease. Dig Liver Dis. 2002; 34(3):177-82. DOI: 10.1016/s1590-8658(02)80190-6. View

3.
Yantiss R, Odze R . Optimal approach to obtaining mucosal biopsies for assessment of inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104(3):774-83. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2008.108. View

4.
Meenan J . Staging stenotic oesophageal tumours: are CT and/or PET enough? Dilate or not?. Endoscopy. 2006; 38 Suppl 1:S8-12. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-946643. View

5.
Shah A, Kagalwalla A, Gonsalves N, Melin-Aldana H, Li B, Hirano I . Histopathologic variability in children with eosinophilic esophagitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104(3):716-21. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2008.117. View