» Articles » PMID: 31815934

Genetic Diversity of Laboratory Strains and Implications for Research: The Case of Aedes Aegypti

Overview
Date 2019 Dec 10
PMID 31815934
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The yellow fever mosquito (Aedes aegypti), is the primary vector of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya fever, among other arboviral diseases. It is also a popular laboratory model in vector biology due to its ease of rearing and manipulation in the lab. Established laboratory strains have been used worldwide in thousands of studies for decades. Laboratory evolution of reference strains and contamination among strains are potential severe problems that could dramatically change experimental outcomes and thus is a concern in vector biology. We analyzed laboratory and field colonies of Ae. aegypti and an Ae. aegypti-derived cell line (Aag2) using 12 microsatellites and ~20,000 SNPs to determine the extent of divergence among laboratory strains and relationships to their wild relatives. We found that 1) laboratory populations are less genetically variable than their field counterparts; 2) colonies bearing the same name obtained from different laboratories may be highly divergent; 3) present genetic composition of the LVP strain used as the genome reference is incompatible with its presumed origin; 4) we document changes in two wild caught colonies over ~16 generations of colonization; and 5) the Aag2 Ae. aegypti cell line has experienced minimal genetic changes within and across laboratories. These results illustrate the degree of variability within and among strains of Ae. aegypti, with implications for cross-study comparisons, and highlight the need of a common mosquito repository and the implementation of strain validation tools.

Citing Articles

From macro to micro: De novo genomes of Aedes mosquitoes enable comparative genomics among close and distant relatives.

Morinaga G, Balcazar D, Badolo A, Iyaloo D, Tantely L, Mouillaud T bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39868221 PMC: 11760778. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.13.632753.


Evidence for Significant Skew and Low Heritability of Competitive Male Mating Success in the Yellow Fever Mosquito .

Wyer C, Trajanovikj V, Hollis B, Ponlawat A, Cator L Evol Appl. 2024; 17(12):e70061.

PMID: 39735342 PMC: 11671345. DOI: 10.1111/eva.70061.


CRISPR-Cas9 and Cas12a target site richness reflects genomic diversity in natural populations of Anopheles gambiae and Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.

Collier T, Lee Y, Mathias D, Lopez Del Amo V BMC Genomics. 2024; 25(1):700.

PMID: 39020310 PMC: 11253549. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-024-10597-4.


Challenges of Robust RNAi-Mediated Gene Silencing in Mosquitoes.

Figueiredo Prates L, Fiebig J, Schlosser H, Liapi E, Rehling T, Lutrat C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(10).

PMID: 38791257 PMC: 11121262. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25105218.


The midgut epithelium of mosquitoes adjusts cell proliferation and endoreplication to respond to physiological challenges.

Taracena-Agarwal M, Hixson B, Nandakumar S, Girard-Mejia A, Chen R, Huot L BMC Biol. 2024; 22(1):22.

PMID: 38281940 PMC: 10823748. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-023-01769-x.


References
1.
Nelson-Rees W, Daniels D, Flandermeyer R . Cross-contamination of cells in culture. Science. 1981; 212(4493):446-52. DOI: 10.1126/science.6451928. View

2.
Chang C, Chow C, Tellier L, Vattikuti S, Purcell S, Lee J . Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience. 2015; 4:7. PMC: 4342193. DOI: 10.1186/s13742-015-0047-8. View

3.
Gloria-Soria A, Lima A, Lovin D, Cunningham J, Severson D, Powell J . Origin of a High-Latitude Population of in Washington, DC. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017; 98(2):445-452. PMC: 5929211. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0676. View

4.
Horosko 3rd S, Lima J, Brandolini M . Establishment of a free-mating colony of Anopheles albitarsis from Brazil. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1997; 13(1):95-6. View

5.
Cornuet J, Luikart G . Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics. 1996; 144(4):2001-14. PMC: 1207747. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.2001. View