Reliability of Mesopic Measures of Visual Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity and Their Correlation with Rod and Cone Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa

Overview

Journal Ophthalmic Res

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2019 Dec 6

PMID 31805550

Citations 4

Authors

Ava K Bittner

Mariana C Ferraz

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Mesopic conditions elicit both rod and cone responses, and they are more commonly encountered in daily life than are scotopic conditions; yet visual function outcome measures of mesopic visual acuity (VA) or contrast sensitivity (CS) are rarely evaluated.

Objective: In retinitis pigmentosa (RP), we explored whether visual reductions in mesopic versus photopic conditions were correlated with cone or rod function, as well as the between-visit test-retest variability in mesopic measures.

Methods: At each of two visits, 22 RP subjects completed mesopic and photopic ETDRS VA and Pelli-Robson chart CS tests obtained with and without a U23 NoIR 4% transmission filter; testing of perifoveal scotopic cone or rod sensitivity with the AdaptDx; and the Rabin Cone Contrast Test (CCT).

Results: A greater CS reduction in mesopic versus photopic conditions was significantly related to absence of scotopic rod function (p = 0.038) or longer self-reported duration of night vision loss (p = 0.044). VA reductions >0.2 logMAR in mesopic versus photopic conditions were significantly related to reduced cone-mediated scotopic sensitivity (p = 0.038). Significant predictors of the CCT ratio of S-cone to M- and L-cone sensitivity were mesopic VA (p = 0.038) and absence of AdaptDx rod function (p = 0.008). Test-retest 95% coefficients of repeatability were not significantly different when comparing between photopic and mesopic tests of VA (0.16 and 0.12 logMAR, respectively) or CS (0.21 and 0.24 logCS, respectively).

Conclusions: Perifoveal scotopic rod and cone function measured with the AdaptDx was significantly correlated with mesopic CS and VA, respectively, which had good, acceptable test-retest repeatability; thus, they appear to be suitable outcome measures to monitor mesopic visual function in clinical practice or trials. RP subjects with reduced mesopic VA and no perifoveal rod function had a greater loss of sensitivity for S-cones than for L-/M-cones.

Citing Articles

Real-world outcomes of Voretigene Neparvovec: a single-centre consecutive case series.

Jalil A, Ferrara M, Lippera M, Parry N, Black G, Banderas S Eye (Lond). 2025; .

PMID: 39900645 DOI: 10.1038/s41433-025-03637-0.

MNREAD Reading Vision in Adults With Glaucoma Under Mesopic and Photopic Conditions.

Goddin T, Yu H, Friedman D, Owsley C, Kwon M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(15):43.

PMID: 38153749 PMC: 10756241. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.15.43.

Reading Vision in Adults With Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration Under Mesopic and Photopic Conditions.

Kwon M, Owsley C Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023; 12(9):7.

PMID: 37676678 PMC: 10494985. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.12.9.7.

Keuken A, Subramanian A, Mueller-Schotte S, Barbur J Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2022; 42(6):1363-1378.

PMID: 35979702 DOI: 10.1111/opo.13037.

The Impact of Cataract Surgery on Contrast Visual Acuity and Retinal Sensitivity in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Miura G, Baba T, Tatsumi T, Yokouchi H, Yamamoto S J Ophthalmol. 2021; 2021:2281834.

PMID: 34820138 PMC: 8608543. DOI: 10.1155/2021/2281834.

References

Hood D, Benimoff N, Greenstein V . The response range of the blue-cone pathways: a source of vulnerability to disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1984; 25(7):864-7. View

Koenekoop R . Why do cone photoreceptors die in rod-specific forms of retinal degenerations?. Ophthalmic Genet. 2009; 30(3):152-4. DOI: 10.1080/13816810902788974. View

Greenstein V, Hood D, Ritch R, Steinberger D, Carr R . S (blue) cone pathway vulnerability in retinitis pigmentosa, diabetes and glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989; 30(8):1732-7. View

Iftikhar M, Kherani S, Kaur R, Lemus M, Nefalar A, Usmani B . Progression of Retinitis Pigmentosa as Measured on Microperimetry: The PREP-1 Study. Ophthalmol Retina. 2019; 2(5):502-507. DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2017.09.008. View

Jacobson S, Roman A, Aleman T, Sumaroka A, Herrera W, Windsor E . Normal central retinal function and structure preserved in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009; 51(2):1079-85. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4372. View

Sayman Muslubas I, Karacorlu M, Arf S, Hocaoglu M, Ersoz M . FEATURES OF THE MACULA AND CENTRAL VISUAL FIELD AND FIXATION PATTERN IN PATIENTS WITH RETINITIS PIGMENTOSA. Retina. 2017; 38(2):424-431. DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001532. View

Bennett L, Klein M, Locke K, Kiser K, Birch D . Dark-Adapted Chromatic Perimetry for Measuring Rod Visual Fields in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017; 6(4):15. PMC: 5549985. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.6.4.15. View

Massof R, Finkelstein D . Rod sensitivity relative to cone sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979; 18(3):263-72. View

Cideciyan A, Swider M, Aleman T, Feuer W, Schwartz S, Russell R . Macular function in macular degenerations: repeatability of microperimetry as a potential outcome measure for ABCA4-associated retinopathy trials. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012; 53(2):841-52. PMC: 3317423. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8415. View

10.

Bovolenta P, Cisneros E . Retinitis pigmentosa: cone photoreceptors starving to death. Nat Neurosci. 2008; 12(1):5-6. DOI: 10.1038/nn0109-5. View

11.

Kiser A, Mladenovich D, Eshraghi F, Bourdeau D, Dagnelie G . Reliability and consistency of dark-adapted psychophysical measures in advanced eye disease. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005; 47(1):444-52. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-1146. View

12.

Rabin J, Gooch J, Ivan D . Rapid quantification of color vision: the cone contrast test. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010; 52(2):816-20. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-6283. View

13.

Kiser A, Mladenovich D, Eshraghi F, Bourdeau D, Dagnelie G . Reliability and consistency of visual acuity and contrast sensitivity measures in advanced eye disease. Optom Vis Sci. 2005; 82(11):946-54. DOI: 10.1097/01.opx.0000187863.12609.7b. View

14.

Ferris 3rd F, Kassoff A, Bresnick G, Bailey I . New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am J Ophthalmol. 1982; 94(1):91-6. View

15.

Hood D, Greenstein V . Blue (S) cone pathway vulnerability: a test of a fragile receptor hypothesis. Appl Opt. 2010; 27(6):1025-9. DOI: 10.1364/AO.27.001025. View

16.

Ahnelt P, Kolb H, Pflug R . Identification of a subtype of cone photoreceptor, likely to be blue sensitive, in the human retina. J Comp Neurol. 1987; 255(1):18-34. DOI: 10.1002/cne.902550103. View

17.

Alexander K, Hutman L, Fishman G . Abnormal foveal spectral sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987; 28(4):725-30. View

18.

Sandberg M, Berson E . Blue and green cone mechanisms in retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1977; 16(2):149-57. View

19.

Hartong D, Berson E, Dryja T . Retinitis pigmentosa. Lancet. 2006; 368(9549):1795-809. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69740-7. View

20.

Swanson W, Birch D, Anderson J . S-cone function in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993; 34(11):3045-55. View