» Articles » PMID: 37676678

Reading Vision in Adults With Early and Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration Under Mesopic and Photopic Conditions

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Reading is involved in various daily activities that operate under a wide range of luminance levels. Rod- and cone-mediated mesopic visual function is known to be impaired even in early/intermediate age-related macular degeneration (AMD). It remains unclear whether and to what extent mesopic reading is impaired in early/intermediate AMD. Here, we assessed differences in reading vision between photopic and mesopic conditions in early/intermediate AMD and compared their performance to those in older adults with normal macular health.

Methods: The study included 30 patients with early/intermediate AMD and 30 healthy controls. Reading performance was tested on the MNREAD iPad app under mesopic (2 cd/m2 with a neural-density filter) and photopic (220 cd/m2) conditions. Four reading indices-maximum reading speed (MRS), critical print size (CPS), reading acuity (RA), and reading accessibility index (ACC)-were obtained from the MNREAD test, yielding a function representing reading speed versus print size.

Results: Compared to photopic conditions, patients with AMD and healthy controls both exhibited noticeable decreases in reading vision under mesopic conditions (P < 0.001) despite normal photopic visual acuity. This decrease was more pronounced in AMD even after adjusting for age (P < 0.001): Under mesopic conditions, MRS and ACC decreased by 8 words per minute and 0.1, respectively; CPS and RA were enlarged by 0.27 and 0.24 logMAR, respectively.

Conclusions: Reading vision deteriorates under mesopic conditions compared to photopic conditions in early/intermediate AMD and is accentuated compared to this difference in healthy controls.

Translational Relevance: A mesopic reading test may provide a more sensitive and comprehensive assessment of a patient's reading impairment.

References
1.
Owsley C, Clark M, McGwin Jr G . Natural History of Rod-Mediated Dark Adaptation over 2 Years in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2017; 6(3):15. PMC: 5461063. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.6.3.15. View

2.
Elliott D, Strong J, Pace R, Plotkin A, Bevers P . Demographic characteristics of the vision-disabled elderly. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38(12):2566-75. View

3.
Owsley C, McGwin Jr G, Scilley K, Kallies K . Development of a questionnaire to assess vision problems under low luminance in age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47(2):528-35. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1222. View

4.
Omari A, Niziol L, Gardner T . Reading deficits in diabetic patients treated with panretinal photocoagulation and good visual acuity. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019; 97(7):e1013-e1018. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14097. View

5.
Curcio C, Owsley C, Jackson G . Spare the rods, save the cones in aging and age-related maculopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000; 41(8):2015-8. View