» Articles » PMID: 31802144

Diabetes Digital App Technology: Benefits, Challenges, and Recommendations. A Consensus Report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group

Overview
Journal Diabetologia
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2019 Dec 6
PMID 31802144
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Digital health technology, especially digital and health applications ('apps'), have been developing rapidly to help people manage their diabetes. Numerous health-related apps provided on smartphones and other wireless devices are available to support people with diabetes who need to adopt either lifestyle interventions or medication adjustments in response to glucose-monitoring data. However, regulations and guidelines have not caught up with the burgeoning field to standardise how mobile health apps are reviewed and monitored for patient safety and clinical validity. The available evidence on the safety and effectiveness of mobile health apps, especially for diabetes, remains limited. The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) have therefore conducted a joint review of the current landscape of available diabetes digital health technology (only stand-alone diabetes apps, as opposed to those that are integral to a regulated medical device, such as insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitoring systems, and automated insulin delivery systems) and practices of regulatory authorities and organisations. We found that, across the USA and Europe, mobile apps intended to manage health and wellness are largely unregulated unless they meet the definition of medical devices for therapeutic and/or diagnostic purposes. International organisations, including the International Medical Device Regulators Forum and WHO, have made strides in classifying different types of digital health technology and integrating digital health technology into the field of medical devices. As the diabetes digital health field continues to develop and become more fully integrated into everyday life, we wish to ensure that it is based on the best evidence for safety and efficacy. As a result, we bring to light several issues that the diabetes community, including regulatory authorities, policymakers, professional organisations, researchers, people with diabetes and healthcare professionals, needs to address to ensure that diabetes health technology can meet its full potential. These issues range from inadequate evidence on app accuracy and clinical validity to lack of training provision, poor interoperability and standardisation, and insufficient data security. We conclude with a series of recommended actions to resolve some of these shortcomings.

Citing Articles

Digital Health Technology in Diabetes Management in the Asia-Pacific Region: A Narrative Review of the Current Scenario and Future Outlook.

Gardner D, Saboo B, Kesavadev J, Mustafa N, Villa M, Mahoney E Diabetes Ther. 2025; 16(3):349-369.

PMID: 39928223 PMC: 11868478. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-025-01692-0.


Electronic health Literacy gaps among adults with diabetes in the United States: Role of socioeconomic and demographic factors.

Nagori A, Keshvani N, Patel L, Dhruve R, Sumarsono A Prev Med Rep. 2025; 47():102895.

PMID: 39823076 PMC: 11738049. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102895.


Exploring Opportunities and Challenges for the Spread, Scale-Up, and Sustainability of mHealth Apps for Self-Management of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Netherlands: Citizen Science Approach.

van Leersum C, Bults M, Siebrand E, Olthuis T, Bekhuis R, Konijnendijk A JMIR Diabetes. 2024; 9:e56917.

PMID: 39689302 PMC: 11688593. DOI: 10.2196/56917.


Wearable Devices for Supporting Chronic Disease Self-Management: Scoping Review.

Gagnon M, Ouellet S, Attisso E, Supper W, Amil S, Rheaume C Interact J Med Res. 2024; 13:e55925.

PMID: 39652850 PMC: 11667132. DOI: 10.2196/55925.


Mobile apps for diabetes self-management: An updated review of app features and effectiveness.

Corsica J, Kelly M, Bradley L, Konsor M, Wilson E, Quinones I J Behav Med. 2024; 48(1):137-148.

PMID: 39489882 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-024-00525-y.


References
1.
Baratloo A, Hosseini M, Negida A, El Ashal G . Part 1: Simple Definition and Calculation of Accuracy, Sensitivity and Specificity. Emerg (Tehran). 2015; 3(2):48-9. PMC: 4614595. View

2.
Wyatt J . How can clinicians, specialty societies and others evaluate and improve the quality of apps for patient use?. BMC Med. 2018; 16(1):225. PMC: 6276222. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-018-1211-7. View

3.
Lum E, Jimenez G, Huang Z, Thai L, Semwal M, Boehm B . Decision Support and Alerts of Apps for Self-management of Blood Glucose for Type 2 Diabetes. JAMA. 2019; 321(15):1530-1532. PMC: 6484806. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.1644. View

4.
Hood M, Wilson R, Corsica J, Bradley L, Chirinos D, Vivo A . What do we know about mobile applications for diabetes self-management? A review of reviews. J Behav Med. 2016; 39(6):981-994. DOI: 10.1007/s10865-016-9765-3. View

5.
Hogan N, Kerin M . Smart phone apps: smart patients, steer clear. Patient Educ Couns. 2012; 89(2):360-1. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.07.016. View