» Articles » PMID: 25227131

Management of Endocrine Disease. Effects of Telecare Intervention on Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2014 Sep 18
PMID 25227131
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To review the published literature on the effects of telecare intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control.

Design And Methods: A review of randomized controlled trials on telecare intervention in patients with type 2 diabetes, and a search of electronic databases such as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EBSCO, CINAHL, Science Direct, Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), were conducted from December 8 to 16, 2013. Two evaluators independently selected and reviewed the eligible studies. Changes in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), post-prandial plasma glucose (PPG), BMI, and body weight were analyzed.

Results: An analysis of 18 studies with 3798 subjects revealed that telecare significantly improved the management of diabetes. Mean HbA1c values were reduced by -0.54 (95% CI, -0.75 to -0.34; P<0.05), mean FPG levels by -9.00 mg/dl (95% CI, -17.36 to -0.64; P=0.03), and mean PPG levels reduced by -52.86 mg/dl (95% CI, -77.13 to -28.58; P<0.05) when compared with the group receiving standard care. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses indicated that study location, sample size, and treatment-monitoring techniques were the sources of heterogeneity.

Conclusions: Patients monitored by telecare showed significant improvement in glycemic control in type 2 diabetes when compared with those monitored by routine follow-up. Significant reduction in HbA1c levels was associated with Asian populations, small sample size, and telecare, and with those patients with baseline HbA1c greater than 8.0%.

Citing Articles

Effect of virtual care in type 2 diabetes management - a systematic umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analysis.

Ravi S, Meyerowitz-Katz G, Yung C, Ayre J, McCaffery K, Maberly G BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):348.

PMID: 40050767 PMC: 11884068. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12496-0.


Improving diabetes self-management and control through individualized patient counseling: A quasi-experimental study.

Yogesh M, Nagda J, Babaria D, Misra S J Educ Health Promot. 2024; 13:407.

PMID: 39703633 PMC: 11657953. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1951_23.


An SMS-Guided Basal Insulin Titration in People with Type 2 Diabetes New on Insulin.

Snel T, Reinhardt S, Koenig H, Pleus S, Freckmann G Diabetes Ther. 2024; 15(11):2429-2441.

PMID: 39347901 PMC: 11466967. DOI: 10.1007/s13300-024-01650-2.


Evaluation of the clinical effectiveness of telephone consultation compared to face-to-face consultation in terms of glycaemic control among patients with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study.

Koh Z, Sim S, Lew K, Lee P, Lee E BMJ Open. 2023; 13(5):e063094.

PMID: 37160388 PMC: 10173985. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063094.


Clinical Utility of a Digital Therapeutic Intervention in Indian Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: 12-Week Prospective Single-Arm Intervention Study.

Chawla R, Jaggi S, Gupta A, Bantwal G, Patil S JMIR Diabetes. 2022; 7(4):e41401.

PMID: 36226840 PMC: 9664320. DOI: 10.2196/41401.