» Articles » PMID: 31782916

The Autonomic Nervous System and the Brainstem: A Fundamental Role or the Background Actors for Consciousness Generation? Hypothesis, Evidence, and Future Directions for Rehabilitation and Theoretical Approaches

Overview
Journal Brain Behav
Specialty Psychology
Date 2019 Nov 30
PMID 31782916
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: One of the hardest challenges of the third century is to develop theories that could joint different results for a global explanation of human consciousness. Some important theories have been proposed, trying to explain the emergence of consciousness as the result of different progressive changes in the elaboration of information during brain processing, giving particular attention to the thalamocortical system.

Methods: In this article, a summary review of results that highlighted as cerebral cortex could not be so fundamental for consciousness generation is proposed. In detail, three topics were analyzed: (a) studies using experimental approach (manipulating stimuli or brain areas), such as decorticated animals or subliminal presentation of stimuli; (b) studies using anatomo-clinical method (conscious inferenced from observed behaviors); and (c) data from neurostimulation of subcortical areas or of the autonomic nervous system.

Results: We sketch two speculative hypothesis relative, firstly, to the possible independence from cortical areas of the on/off mechanism for consciousness generation and, secondly, to the possible role of information variability generated by the bottom-up exchange of information among neural systems as a switch for consciousness.

Conclusions: A broad range of evidence regarding the functional role of the brainstem and autonomic nervous system is reviewed for its bearing on a future hypothesis regarding the generation of consciousness experience.

Citing Articles

Brainstem transcriptomic changes in male Wistar rats after acute stress, comparing the use of duplex specific nuclease (DSN).

Lanshakov D, Sukhareva E, Bulygina V, Khozyainova A, Gerashchenko T, Denisov E Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):21856.

PMID: 39300279 PMC: 11412992. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73042-2.


Central autonomic network and early prognosis in patients with disorders of consciousness.

Riganello F, Vatrano M, Cortese M, Tonin P, Soddu A Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):1610.

PMID: 38238457 PMC: 10796939. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-51457-1.


Conscious processing of global and local auditory irregularities causes differentiated heartbeat-evoked responses.

Candia-Rivera D, Raimondo F, Perez P, Naccache L, Tallon-Baudry C, Sitt J Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37888955 PMC: 10651171. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.75352.


Brain-heart interactions in the neurobiology of consciousness.

Candia-Rivera D Curr Res Neurobiol. 2023; 3:100050.

PMID: 36685762 PMC: 9846460. DOI: 10.1016/j.crneur.2022.100050.


Ultrasound-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening Improves Whole Brain Gene Delivery in Mice.

Felix M, Borloz E, Metwally K, Dauba A, Larrat B, Matagne V Pharmaceutics. 2021; 13(8).

PMID: 34452206 PMC: 8399273. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13081245.


References
1.
Bernat J . Chronic disorders of consciousness. Lancet. 2006; 367(9517):1181-92. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68508-5. View

2.
Ansari S, Chaudhri K, Al Moutaery K . Vagus nerve stimulation: indications and limitations. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007; 97(Pt 2):281-6. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-211-33081-4_31. View

3.
Yuan H, Silberstein S . Vagus Nerve and Vagus Nerve Stimulation, a Comprehensive Review: Part I. Headache. 2015; 56(1):71-8. DOI: 10.1111/head.12647. View

4.
Sattin D, Leonardi M, Picozzi M . The autonomic nervous system and the brainstem: A fundamental role or the background actors for consciousness generation? Hypothesis, evidence, and future directions for rehabilitation and theoretical approaches. Brain Behav. 2019; 10(1):e01474. PMC: 6955833. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1474. View

5.
Yang X, Friedman B . Individual differences in behavioral activation and cardiac vagal control influence affective startle modification. Physiol Behav. 2016; 172:3-11. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2016.06.004. View