» Articles » PMID: 31781522

Conditioning Perspectives for Primary Immunodeficiency Stem Cell Transplants

Overview
Journal Front Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2019 Nov 30
PMID 31781522
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The majority of children undergoing Hematopoietic Stem cell Transplantation (HSCT) require conditioning therapy to make space and prevent rejection of the donor stem cells. The exception is certain children with Severe Combined immune deficiency, who have limited or no ability to reject the donor graft. Transplant conditioning is associated with significant morbidity and mortality from both direct toxic effects of chemotherapy as well as opportunistic infections associated with profound immunosuppression. The ultimate goal of transplant practice is to achieve sufficient engraftment of donor cells to correct the underlying disease with minimal short- and long-term toxicity to the recipient. Traditional combinations, such as busulfan and cyclophosphamide, achieve a high rate of full donor engraftment, but are associated with significant acute transplant-related-mortality and late effects such as infertility. Less "intensive" approaches, such as combinations of treosulfan or melphalan with fludarabine, are less toxic, but may be associated with rejection or low level chimerism requiring the need for re-transplantation. The major benefit of these novel approaches, however, which we hope will be realized in the decades to come, may be the preservation of fertility. Future approaches look to replace chemotherapy with non-toxic antibody conditioning. The lessons learnt in refining conditioning for HSCT are likely to be equally applicable to gene therapy protocols for the same diseases.

Citing Articles

cMPL-Based Purification and Depletion of Human Hematopoietic Stem Cells: Implications for Pre-Transplant Conditioning.

Araki D, Hong S, Linde N, Fisk B, Redekar N, Salisbury-Ruf C bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38464076 PMC: 10925094. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.24.581887.


Case report: Challenges in immune reconstitution following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for CTLA-4 insufficiency-like primary immune regulatory disorders.

Margarit-Soler A, Deya-Martinez A, Canizales J, Vlagea A, Garcia-Garcia A, Marsal J Front Immunol. 2023; 13:1070068.

PMID: 36636328 PMC: 9831655. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1070068.


Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with inborn errors of immunity.

Laberko A, Sultanova E, Idarmacheva A, Skvortsova Y, Shelikhova L, Nechesnyuk A Bone Marrow Transplant. 2022; 58(3):273-281.

PMID: 36456809 PMC: 10005930. DOI: 10.1038/s41409-022-01883-4.


Curative islet and hematopoietic cell transplantation in diabetic mice without toxic bone marrow conditioning.

Chang C, Bhagchandani P, Poyser J, Velasco B, Zhao W, Kwon H Cell Rep. 2022; 41(6):111615.

PMID: 36351397 PMC: 9922474. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111615.


Improved engraftment and therapeutic efficacy by human genome-edited hematopoietic stem cells with Busulfan-based myeloablation.

Poletto E, Colella P, Pimentel Vera L, Khan S, Tomatsu S, Baldo G Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2022; 25:392-409.

PMID: 35573043 PMC: 9065050. DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2022.04.009.


References
1.
Willemsen L, Jol-van der Zijde C, Admiraal R, Putter H, Jansen-Hoogendijk A, Ostaijen-Ten Dam M . Impact of serotherapy on immune reconstitution and survival outcomes after stem cell transplantations in children: thymoglobulin versus alemtuzumab. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014; 21(3):473-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.11.674. View

2.
Harris A, Boelens J, Ahn K, Fei M, Abraham A, Artz A . Comparison of pediatric allogeneic transplant outcomes using myeloablative busulfan with cyclophosphamide or fludarabine. Blood Adv. 2018; 2(11):1198-1206. PMC: 5998928. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018016956. View

3.
Wilkinson F, Sergijenko A, Langford-Smith K, Malinowska M, Wynn R, Bigger B . Busulfan conditioning enhances engraftment of hematopoietic donor-derived cells in the brain compared with irradiation. Mol Ther. 2013; 21(4):868-76. PMC: 3616529. DOI: 10.1038/mt.2013.29. View

4.
Morillo-Gutierrez B, Beier R, Rao K, Burroughs L, Schulz A, Ewins A . Treosulfan-based conditioning for allogeneic HSCT in children with chronic granulomatous disease: a multicenter experience. Blood. 2016; 128(3):440-8. PMC: 4957165. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-704015. View

5.
Faraci M, Diesch T, Labopin M, Dalissier A, Lankester A, Gennery A . Gonadal Function after Busulfan Compared with Treosulfan in Children and Adolescents Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019; 25(9):1786-1791. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2019.05.005. View