» Articles » PMID: 19896087

Defining the Intensity of Conditioning Regimens: Working Definitions

Abstract

Defining conditioning regimen intensity has become a critical issue for the hemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) community. In the present report we propose to define conditioning regimens in 3 categories: (1) myeloablative (MA) conditioning, (2) reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC), and (3) nonmyeloablative (NMA) conditioning. Assignment to these categories is based on the duration of cytopenia and on the requirement for stem cell (SC) support: MA regimens cause irreversible cytopenia and SC support is mandatory. NMA regimens cause minimal cytopenia, and can be given also without SC support. RIC regimens do not fit criteria for MA or NMA regimens: they cause cytopenia of variable duration, and should be given with stem cell support, although cytopenia may not be irreversible. This report also assigns commonly used regimens to one of these categories, based upon the agents, dose, or combinations. Standardized classification of conditioning regimen intensities will allow comparison across studies and interpretation of study results.

Citing Articles

Improved GVHD-free and relapse-free survival after ex vivo αβTCR and CD19 depleted allogeneic HSCT compared to T cell replete HSCT.

Stuut A, Nijssen C, van der Wagen L, van Rhenen A, Daenen L, Janssen A Bone Marrow Transplant. 2025; .

PMID: 40089614 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-025-02538-w.


Effect of conditioning intensity on late complications in AYA who underwent allogeneic HCT during childhood.

Shimomura M, Ashiarai M, Kato I, Kamiya T, Taketomi N, Akita T Int J Hematol. 2025; .

PMID: 40063330 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-025-03961-x.


Prognostic impact of effusion in multiple body cavities after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Masuda Y, Honda A, Oyama T, Masamoto Y, Kurokawa M Int J Hematol. 2025; .

PMID: 40032737 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-025-03949-7.


Transplantation outcomes of TP53-mutant AML and MDS: a single transplantation center experience of 63 patients.

Masuda Y, Sadato D, Toya T, Hosoda Y, Hirama C, Shimizu H Int J Hematol. 2025; .

PMID: 40011351 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-025-03951-z.


cfDNA Chimerism and Somatic Mutation Testing in Early Prediction of Relapse After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloid Malignancies.

Rowley S, Albitar M, Baker M, Ali A, Kaur S, Suh H Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(4).

PMID: 40002220 PMC: 11853444. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17040625.


References
1.
BROWN R, Herzig R, Wolff S, Frei-Lahr D, Pineiro L, Bolwell B . High-dose etoposide and cyclophosphamide without bone marrow transplantation for resistant hematologic malignancy. Blood. 1990; 76(3):473-9. View

2.
Gratwohl A, Baldomero H, Passweg J, Urbano-Ispizua A . Increasing use of reduced intensity conditioning transplants: report of the 2001 EBMT activity survey. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002; 30(12):813-31. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703819. View

3.
Hegenbart U, Niederwieser D, Sandmaier B, Maris M, Shizuru J, Greinix H . Treatment for acute myelogenous leukemia by low-dose, total-body, irradiation-based conditioning and hematopoietic cell transplantation from related and unrelated donors. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 24(3):444-53. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.1765. View

4.
Kanfer E, Buckner C, Fefer A, Storb R, Appelbaum F, Hill R . Allogeneic and syngeneic marrow transplantation following high dose dimethylbusulfan, cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1987; 1(4):339-46. View

5.
Martino R, Iacobelli S, Brand R, Jansen T, van Biezen A, Finke J . Retrospective comparison of reduced-intensity conditioning and conventional high-dose conditioning for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using HLA-identical sibling donors in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2006; 108(3):836-46. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-11-4503. View