» Articles » PMID: 31761962

Systematic Review of Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life After Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery and Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: a Word of Caution

Overview
Date 2019 Nov 26
PMID 31761962
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The introduction of transanal endoscopic or minimally invasive surgery has allowed organ preservation for rectal tumors with good oncological results. Data on functional and quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes are scarce and controversial. This systematic review sought to synthesize fecal continence, QoL, and manometric outcomes after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS).

Methods: A systematic review of the literature including Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted searching for articles reporting on functional outcomes after TEM or TAMIS between January 1995 and June 2018. The evaluated outcome parameters were pre- and postoperative fecal continence (primary endpoint), QoL, and manometric results. Data were extracted using the same scales and measurement units as from the original study.

Results: A total of 29 studies comprising 1297 patients were included. Fecal continence outcomes were evaluated in 23 (79%) studies with a wide variety of assessment tools and divergent results. Ten studies (34%) analyzed QoL changes, and manometric variables were assessed in 15 studies (51%). Most studies reported some deterioration in manometric scores without major QoL impairment. Due to the heterogeneity of the data, it was not possible to perform any pooled analysis or meta-analysis.

Conclusions: These techniques do not seem to affect continence by themselves except in minor cases. The possibility of worsened function after TEM and TAMIS should not be underestimated. There is a need to homogenize or standardize functional and manometric outcomes assessment after TEM or TAMIS.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for early rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Wang C, Huang T, Wang X Front Oncol. 2025; 15:1545547.

PMID: 39995839 PMC: 11847824. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1545547.


Trans‑anal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus rigid platforms for local excision of early rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature.

Garoufalia Z, Rogers P, Meknarit S, Mavrantonis S, Aeschbacher P, Ray-Offor E Surg Endosc. 2024; 38(8):4198-4206.

PMID: 39026004 PMC: 11289048. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11065-6.


Does transanal endoscopic microsurgery affect rectal function?.

Khomyakov E, Chernyshov S, Fomenko O, Rybakov E Ann Coloproctol. 2022; 39(4):326-331.

PMID: 36375444 PMC: 10475803. DOI: 10.3393/ac.2022.00220.0031.


Low anterior resection syndrome: An unavoidable price to pay to preserve the rectum?.

Marinello F, Pellino G, Espin-Basany E Front Oncol. 2022; 12:994720.

PMID: 36313684 PMC: 9614064. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.994720.


Metal stent combined with ileus drainage tube for the treatment of delayed rectal perforation: A case report.

Cheng S, Xie L, Wu H, Zhang X, Lou L, Shen H World J Clin Cases. 2022; 10(23):8406-8416.

PMID: 36159539 PMC: 9403701. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i23.8406.


References
1.
Serra-Aracil X, Pericay C, Golda T, Mora L, Targarona E, Delgado S . Non-inferiority multicenter prospective randomized controlled study of rectal cancer T-T (superficial) N, M undergoing neoadjuvant treatment and local excision (TEM) vs total mesorectal excision (TME). Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017; 33(2):241-249. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-017-2942-1. View

2.
Hemingway D, Flett M, McKee R, Finlay I . Sphincter function after transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumours. Br J Surg. 1996; 83(1):51-2. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800830116. View

3.
Dahlberg M, Glimelius B, Graf W, Pahlman L . Preoperative irradiation affects functional results after surgery for rectal cancer: results from a randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998; 41(5):543-9; discussion 549-51. DOI: 10.1007/BF02235256. View

4.
Meng W, Lau P, Yip A . Treatment of early rectal tumours by transanal endoscopic microsurgery in Hong Kong: prospective study. Hong Kong Med J. 2004; 10(4):239-43. View

5.
Barendse R, Oors J, de Graaf E, Bemelman W, Fockens P, Dekker E . The effect of endoscopic mucosal resection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery on anorectal function. Colorectal Dis. 2013; 15(9):e534-41. DOI: 10.1111/codi.12311. View