» Articles » PMID: 29234923

Non-inferiority Multicenter Prospective Randomized Controlled Study of Rectal Cancer T-T (superficial) N, M Undergoing Neoadjuvant Treatment and Local Excision (TEM) Vs Total Mesorectal Excision (TME)

Overview
Date 2017 Dec 14
PMID 29234923
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The standard treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma is total mesorectal excision (TME), in many cases requires a temporary or permanent stoma. TME is associated with high morbidity and genitourinary alterations. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) allows access to tumors up to 20 cm from the anal verge, achieves minimal postoperative morbidity and mortality rates, and does not require an ostomy. The treatment of T2, N0, and M0 cancers remains controversial. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in association with TEM reduces local recurrence and increases survival. The TAU-TEM study aims to demonstrate the non-inferiority of the oncological outcomes and the improvement in morbidity and quality of life achieved with TEM compared with TME.

Methods: Prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial includes patients with rectal adenocarcinoma less than 10 cm from the anal verge and up to 4 cm in size, staged as T2 or T3-superficial N0-M0. Patients will be randomized to two areas: CRT plus TEM or radical surgery (TME). Postoperative morbidity and mortality will be recorded and patients will complete the quality of life questionnaires before the start of treatment, after CRT in the CRT/TEM arm, and 6 months after surgery in both arms. The estimated sample size for the study is 173 patients. Patients will attend follow-up controls for local and systemic relapse.

Conclusions: This study aims to demonstrate the preservation of the rectum after preoperative CRT and TEM in rectal cancer stages T2-3s, N0, M0 and to determine the ability of this strategy to avoid the need for radical surgery (TME).

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01308190. Número de registro del Comité de Etica e Investigación Clínica (CEIC) del Hospital universitario Parc Taulí: TAU-TEM-2009-01.

Citing Articles

Treatment Options for Distal Rectal Cancer in the Era of Organ Preservation.

Wang C, Liu X, Wang W, Miao Z, Li X, Liu D Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2024; 25(4):434-452.

PMID: 38517596 PMC: 10997725. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01194-4.


Local versus radical surgery for early rectal cancer with or without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy.

Motamedi M, Mak N, Brown C, Raval M, Karimuddin A, Giustini D Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 6:CD002198.

PMID: 37310167 PMC: 10264720. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002198.pub3.


The Role of Local Excision after Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Different Perspective.

Aref A, Abdalla A, Drelichman E Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2023; 36(4):290-294.

PMID: 37223224 PMC: 10202544. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1758808.


Strategies to Optimize Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Hu X, Xue Z, He K, Tian Y, Chen Y, Zhao M Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(1).

PMID: 36612213 PMC: 9818694. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15010219.


SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for localized rectal cancer (2021).

Capdevila J, Gomez M, Guillot M, Paez D, Pericay C, Safont M Clin Transl Oncol. 2022; 24(4):646-657.

PMID: 35303269 PMC: 8986677. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-022-02816-9.


References
1.
Sprangers M, Te Velde A, Aaronson N . The construction and testing of the EORTC colorectal cancer-specific quality of life questionnaire module (QLQ-CR38). European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer. 1999; 35(2):238-47. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(98)00357-8. View

2.
Buess G, HUTTERER F, Theiss J, Bobel M, Isselhard W, Pichlmaier H . [A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation]. Chirurg. 1984; 55(10):677-80. View

3.
Ahmad N, Marks G, Mohiuddin M . High-dose preoperative radiation for cancer of the rectum: impact of radiation dose on patterns of failure and survival. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993; 27(4):773-8. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90448-5. View

4.
. Extramural depth of tumor invasion at thin-section MR in patients with rectal cancer: results of the MERCURY study. Radiology. 2007; 243(1):132-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2431051825. View

5.
Therasse P, Arbuck S, Eisenhauer E, Wanders J, Kaplan R, Rubinstein L . New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92(3):205-16. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.3.205. View