» Articles » PMID: 31753921

Changing of the Guard: How the Lyme Disease Spirochete Subverts the Host Immune Response

Overview
Journal J Biol Chem
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2019 Nov 23
PMID 31753921
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Lyme disease, also known as Lyme borreliosis, is the most common tick-transmitted disease in the Northern Hemisphere. The disease is caused by the bacterial spirochete and other related species. One of the many fascinating features of this unique pathogen is an elaborate system for antigenic variation, whereby the sequence of the surface-bound lipoprotein VlsE is continually modified through segmental gene conversion events. This perpetual changing of the guard allows the pathogen to remain one step ahead of the acquired immune response, enabling persistent infection. Accordingly, the locus is the most evolutionarily diverse genetic element in Lyme disease-causing borreliae. Small stretches of information are transferred from a series of silent cassettes in the locus to generate an expressed mosaic gene version that contains genetic information from several different silent cassettes, resulting in ∼10 possible sequences. Yet, despite its extreme evolutionary flexibility, the locus has rigidly conserved structural features. These include a telomeric location of the gene, an inverse orientation of and the silent cassettes, the presence of nearly perfect inverted repeats of ∼100 bp near the 5' end of , and an exceedingly high concentration of G runs in and the silent cassettes. We discuss the possible roles of these evolutionarily conserved features, highlight recent findings from several studies that have used next-generation DNA sequencing to unravel the switching process, and review advances in the development of a mini- system for genetic manipulation of the locus.

Citing Articles

Breaking a barrier: In trans vlsE recombination and genetic manipulation of the native vlsE gene of the Lyme disease pathogen.

Singh P, Bankhead T PLoS Pathog. 2025; 21(1):e1012871.

PMID: 39792948 PMC: 11756760. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1012871.


Meta-analysis of the Vmp-like sequences of Lyme disease : evidence for the evolution of an elaborate antigenic variation system.

Norris S, Brangulis K Front Microbiol. 2024; 15:1469411.

PMID: 39450289 PMC: 11499132. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1469411.


Hitchhiker's Guide to .

Bourgeois J, Hu L J Bacteriol. 2024; 206(9):e0011624.

PMID: 39140751 PMC: 11411949. DOI: 10.1128/jb.00116-24.


Antigenicity and immunogenicity of different morphological forms of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato spirochetes.

Sloupenska K, Koubkova B, Horak P, Dolezilkova J, Hutyrova B, Racansky M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):4014.

PMID: 38369537 PMC: 10874929. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-54505-y.


An allele-selective inter-chromosomal protein bridge supports monogenic antigen expression in the African trypanosome.

Faria J, Tinti M, Marques C, Zoltner M, Yoshikawa H, Field M Nat Commun. 2023; 14(1):8200.

PMID: 38081826 PMC: 10713589. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-44043-y.


References
1.
Huang S, Cozart M, Hart M, Kobryn K . The Borrelia burgdorferi telomere resolvase, ResT, possesses ATP-dependent DNA unwinding activity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017; 45(3):1319-1329. PMC: 5388405. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1243. View

2.
Verhey T, Castellanos M, Chaconas G . Analysis of recombinational switching at the antigenic variation locus of the Lyme spirochete using a novel PacBio sequencing pipeline. Mol Microbiol. 2017; 107(1):104-115. DOI: 10.1111/mmi.13873. View

3.
Liveris D, Mulay V, Sandigursky S, Schwartz I . Borrelia burgdorferi vlsE antigenic variation is not mediated by RecA. Infect Immun. 2008; 76(9):4009-18. PMC: 2519412. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.00027-08. View

4.
Casjens S, Di L, Akther S, Mongodin E, Luft B, Schutzer S . Primordial origin and diversification of plasmids in Lyme disease agent bacteria. BMC Genomics. 2018; 19(1):218. PMC: 5870499. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-018-4597-x. View

5.
Chaconas G, Stewart P, Tilly K, Bono J, Rosa P . Telomere resolution in the Lyme disease spirochete. EMBO J. 2001; 20(12):3229-37. PMC: 150187. DOI: 10.1093/emboj/20.12.3229. View