» Articles » PMID: 31752885

Systematic Review: a Systems Innovation Perspective on Barriers and Facilitators for the Implementation of Healthy Food-store Interventions

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2019 Nov 23
PMID 31752885
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Due to their central position in the modern food system, food stores present a unique opportunity to promote healthy dietary behaviour. However, there is a lack of insight into the factors that impede or enhance the implementation of nutritional interventions in food stores. We applied a systems innovation and implementation science framework to the identification of such barriers and facilitators.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review. A search string was developed to identify qualitative and quantitative articles on environmental nutritional interventions in the food store. Four databases were systematically searched for studies published between 2000 and 2018. Eligible publications described study designs or original studies, focused on stimulating healthier dietary behaviour through environmental changes in retail settings and contained information on the perceptions or experiences of retailers or interventionists regarding the implementation process of the intervention. Context-descriptive data was extracted and a quality assessment was performed.

Results: We included 41 articles, of which the majority was conducted in the USA and involved single stores or a mix of single and multi-store organisations. We categorized barriers and facilitators into 18 themes, under five domains. In the 'outer setting' domain, most factors related to consumers' preferences and demands, and the challenge of establishing a supply of healthy products. In the 'inner setting' domain, these related to conflicting values regarding health promotion and commercial viability, store lay-out, (insufficient) knowledge and work capacity, and routines regarding waste avoidance and product stocking. In the 'actors' domain, no major themes were found. For the 'intervention 'domain', most related to intervention-context fit, money and resource provision, material quality, and the trade-offs between commercial costs and risks versus commercial and health benefits. For the 'process' domain, most factors related to continuous engagement and strong relationships.

Conclusions: This review provides a comprehensive overview of barriers and facilitators to be taken into account when implementing nutritional interventions in food stores. Furthermore, we propose a novel perspective on implementation as the alignment of intervention and retail interests, and a corresponding approach to intervention design which may help avoid barriers, and leverage facilitators.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO; CRD42018095317.

Citing Articles

Perspectives on the sustainment of a healthy vending initiative in a university setting: a reflexive thematic analysis.

Dancey J, Reeve B, Jones A, Brimblecombe J J Nutr Sci. 2025; 14:e23.

PMID: 40070911 PMC: 11894401. DOI: 10.1017/jns.2025.12.


Implementation of a UK supermarket intervention to increase purchasing of fresh fruit and vegetables: process evaluation of the WRAPPED natural experiment.

Baird J, Dhuria P, Payne H, Crozier S, Lawrence W, Vogel C Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024; 21(1):128.

PMID: 39529139 PMC: 11552182. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-024-01679-3.


A systematic review of the implementation of healthy food retail interventions in settings with multiple food retail outlets (complex food retail settings).

Gupta A, Huggins C, Sacks G, Gittelsohn J, Peeters A J Nutr Sci. 2024; 13:e31.

PMID: 39314531 PMC: 11418081. DOI: 10.1017/jns.2024.52.


Implementation of health-promoting retail initiatives in the Healthier Choices in Supermarkets Study-qualitative perspectives from a feasibility study.

Duus K, Tjornhoj-Thomsen T, Krolner R BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):349.

PMID: 39218867 PMC: 11367934. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03561-2.


A Systems Innovation Perspective on Implementation and Sustainment Barriers for Healthy Food Store Interventions: A Reflexive Monitoring in Action Study in Dutch Supermarkets.

Middel C, Schuitmaker-Warnaar T, Mackenbach J, Broerse J Int J Health Policy Manag. 2024; 13:8036.

PMID: 39099507 PMC: 11270604. DOI: 10.34172/ijhpm.2024.8036.


References
1.
Karpyn A, DeWeese R, Pelletier J, Laska M, Ohri-Vachaspati P, Deahl-Greenlaw A . Examining the Feasibility of Healthy Minimum Stocking Standards for Small Food Stores. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018; 118(9):1655-1663. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.12.006. View

2.
Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A . Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2013; 94(3):291-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.031. View

3.
Caspi C, Sorensen G, Subramanian S, Kawachi I . The local food environment and diet: a systematic review. Health Place. 2012; 18(5):1172-87. PMC: 3684395. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.05.006. View

4.
Baquero B, Linnan L, Laraia B, Ayala G . Process evaluation of a food marketing and environmental change intervention in Tiendas that serve Latino immigrants in North Carolina. Health Promot Pract. 2014; 15(6):839-48. PMC: 5500187. DOI: 10.1177/1524839913520546. View

5.
Lent M, Vander Veur S, McCoy T, Wojtanowski A, Sandoval B, Sherman S . A randomized controlled study of a healthy corner store initiative on the purchases of urban, low-income youth. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014; 22(12):2494-500. PMC: 4236232. DOI: 10.1002/oby.20878. View