» Articles » PMID: 31750321

The Risk of Foot and Mouth Disease Transmission Posed by Public Access to the Countryside During an Outbreak

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2019 Nov 22
PMID 31750321
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During the 2001 UK FMD outbreak, local authorities restricted rural access to try to prevent further disease spread by people and animals, which had major socio-economic consequences for rural communities. This study describes the results of qualitative veterinary risk assessments to assess the likelihood of different recreational activities causing new outbreaks of foot and mouth disease, as part of contingency planning for future outbreaks. For most activities, the likelihood of causing new outbreaks of foot and mouth disease is considered to vary from very low to medium depending on the control zone (which is based on distance to the nearest infected premises), assuming compliance with specified mitigation strategies. The likelihood of new outbreaks associated with hunting, shooting, stalking, and equestrian activities is considered to be greater. There are areas of significant uncertainty associated with data paucity, particularly regarding the likelihood of transmission via fomites. This study provides scientific evidence to underpin refinement of rural access management plans and inform decision-making in future disease outbreaks.

Citing Articles

Risk Assessment and Prevention of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Transmission from Laos to China.

Xin J, Lan S, Ai J, Zeng B, Xin A, Ye L Vet Sci. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40005852 PMC: 11860775. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci12020092.


Spatio-temporal distribution of foot and mouth disease outbreaks in Western Amhara region from January 2018 to June 2023.

Demil E, Tadesse B PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0313305.

PMID: 39932936 PMC: 11813087. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313305.


Phylodynamic analysis of foot-and-mouth disease virus evolution in Mar Chiquita, Argentina.

Calderon L, Cabanne G, Marcos A, Novo S, Torres C, Perez A Arch Virol. 2024; 169(5):101.

PMID: 38630189 DOI: 10.1007/s00705-024-06028-0.


A review of foot-and-mouth disease in Ethiopia: epidemiological aspects, economic implications, and control strategies.

Zewdie G, Akalu M, Tolossa W, Belay H, Deresse G, Zekarias M Virol J. 2023; 20(1):299.

PMID: 38102688 PMC: 10724896. DOI: 10.1186/s12985-023-02263-0.


The Biosafety Research Road Map: The Search for Evidence to Support Practices in the Laboratory-Foot and Mouth Disease Virus.

Blacksell S, Dhawan S, Kusumoto M, Le K, Summermatter K, OKeefe J Appl Biosaf. 2023; 28(4):199-215.

PMID: 38090355 PMC: 10712356. DOI: 10.1089/apb.2022.0041.


References
1.
Amass S, Pacheco J, Mason P, Schneider J, Alvarez R, Clark L . Procedures for preventing the transmission of foot-and-mouth disease virus to pigs and sheep by personnel in contact with infected pigs. Vet Rec. 2003; 153(5):137-40. DOI: 10.1136/vr.153.5.137. View

2.
Quan M, Murphy C, Zhang Z, Durand S, Esteves I, Doel C . Influence of exposure intensity on the efficiency and speed of transmission of Foot-and-mouth disease. J Comp Pathol. 2009; 140(4):225-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcpa.2008.12.002. View

3.
Orsel K, Bouma A, Dekker A, Stegeman J, de Jong M . Foot and mouth disease virus transmission during the incubation period of the disease in piglets, lambs, calves, and dairy cows. Prev Vet Med. 2008; 88(2):158-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2008.09.001. View

4.
Charleston B, Bankowski B, Gubbins S, Chase-Topping M, Schley D, Howey R . Relationship between clinical signs and transmission of an infectious disease and the implications for control. Science. 2011; 332(6030):726-9. PMC: 5844461. DOI: 10.1126/science.1199884. View

5.
Kitching R, Hughes G . Clinical variation in foot and mouth disease: sheep and goats. Rev Sci Tech. 2003; 21(3):505-12. DOI: 10.20506/rst.21.3.1342. View