» Articles » PMID: 31749838

Genomic Regions Associated With Gestation Length Detected Using Whole-Genome Sequence Data Differ Between Dairy and Beef Cattle

Overview
Journal Front Genet
Date 2019 Nov 22
PMID 31749838
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

While many association studies exist that have attempted to relate genomic markers to phenotypic performance in cattle, very few have considered gestation length as a phenotype, and of those that did, none used whole genome sequence data from multiple breeds. The objective of the present study was therefore to relate imputed whole genome sequence data to estimated breeding values for gestation length using 22,566 sires (representing 2,262,706 progeny) of multiple breeds [Angus (AA), Charolais (CH), Holstein-Friesian (HF), and Limousin (LM)]. The associations were undertaken within breed using linear mixed models that accounted for genomic relatedness among sires; a separate association analysis was undertaken with all breeds analysed together but with breed included as a fixed effect in the model. Furthermore, the genome was divided into 500 kb segments and whether or not segments harboured a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) with a P ≤ 1 × 10 common to different combinations of breeds was determined. Putative quantitative trait loci (QTL) regions associated with gestation length were detected in all breeds; significant associations with gestation length were only detected in the HF population and in the across-breed analysis of all 22,566 sires. Twenty-five SNPs were significantly associated (P ≤ 5 × 10) with gestation length in the HF population. Of the 25 significant SNPs, 18 were located within three QTLs on Bos taurus autosome number (BTA) 18, six were in two QTL on BTA19, and one was located within a QTL on BTA7. The strongest association was rs381577268, a downstream variant of located within a QTL spanning from 58.06 to 58.19 Mb on BTA18; it accounted for 1.37% of the genetic variance in gestation length. Overall there were 11 HF animals within the edited dataset that were homozygous for the T allele at rs381577268 and these had a 3.3 day longer (P < 0.0001) estimated breeding value (EBV) for gestation length than the heterozygous animals and a 4.7 day longer (P < 0.0001) EBV for gestation length than the homozygous CC animals. The majority of the 500 kb windows harboring a SNP with a P ≤ 1 × 10 were unique to a single breed and no window was shared among all four breeds for gestation length, suggesting any QTLs identified are breed-specific associations.

Citing Articles

Integrated TWAS, GWAS, and RNAseq results identify candidate genes associated with reproductive traits in cows.

Hosseinzadeh S, Rafat S, Fang L Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1932.

PMID: 39809816 PMC: 11733129. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82448-x.


Combined Use of Univariate and Multivariate Approaches to Detect Selection Signatures Associated with Milk or Meat Production in Cattle.

Congiu M, Cesarani A, Falchi L, Macciotta N, Dimauro C Genes (Basel). 2025; 15(12.

PMID: 39766784 PMC: 11675734. DOI: 10.3390/genes15121516.


β-Defensin gene copy number variation in cattle.

Sidekli O, Oketch J, Fair S, Meade K, Hollox E R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(10):241154.

PMID: 39479249 PMC: 11521603. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.241154.


Weighted single-step genome-wide association study for direct and maternal genetic effects associated with birth and weaning weights in sheep.

Khazaei-Koohpar H, Gholizadeh M, Hafezian S, Esmaeili-Fard S Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):13120.

PMID: 38849438 PMC: 11161479. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63974-0.


Understanding the underlying genetic mechanisms for age at first calving, inter-calving period and scrotal circumference in Bonsmara cattle.

Reding J, van der Westhuizen R, Berry D, van Marle-Koster E BMC Genomics. 2023; 24(1):480.

PMID: 37620802 PMC: 10464233. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-023-09518-8.


References
1.
Clausson B, Lichtenstein P, Cnattingius S . Genetic influence on birthweight and gestational length determined by studies in offspring of twins. BJOG. 2000; 107(3):375-81. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13234.x. View

2.
Venancio T, Aravind L . CYSTM, a novel cysteine-rich transmembrane module with a role in stress tolerance across eukaryotes. Bioinformatics. 2009; 26(2):149-52. PMC: 2804304. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp647. View

3.
Roche J, Berry D, Delaby L, Dillon P, Horan B, Macdonald K . Review: New considerations to refine breeding objectives of dairy cows for increasing robustness and sustainability of grass-based milk production systems. Animal. 2018; 12(s2):s350-s362. DOI: 10.1017/S1751731118002471. View

4.
Martin-Urdiroz M, Deeks M, Horton C, Dawe H, Jourdain I . The Exocyst Complex in Health and Disease. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2016; 4:24. PMC: 4828438. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2016.00024. View

5.
Tee J, Peppelenbosch M . Anchoring skeletal muscle development and disease: the role of ankyrin repeat domain containing proteins in muscle physiology. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2010; 45(4):318-30. PMC: 2942773. DOI: 10.3109/10409238.2010.488217. View