» Articles » PMID: 31705151

Modulation of Radiation-induced Oral Mucositis (mouse) by Dermatan Sulfate: Effects on Differentiation Processes

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2019 Nov 10
PMID 31705151
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: During head and neck cancer radiotherapy, oral mucositis is the most frequent early side effect. Systemic dermatan sulfate (DS) administration has been shown to significantly decrease oral mucosal radiation reactions during daily fractionated irradiation (IR) in an established mouse model. The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism of the oral epithelial differentiation process, during IR alone and in combination with DS treatment in the same mouse model.

Methods: Fractionated IR 5 × 3 Gy/week was given to the snouts of mice over two weeks, either alone (IR) or in combination with daily DS treatment of 4 mg/kg (IR + DS). Groups of mice (n = 3) were sacrificed every second day over the course of 14 days in both experimental arms. Their tongue was excised and subjected to immunohistochemical processing.

Results: In the p16 analysis as a proliferation marker, the difference between IR alone and IR + DS in the germinal (proliferation) layer was not significant, not stimulating the proliferation process. For the p21 analysis as a differentiation marker on the functional (differentiation) layer, the difference between IR alone and IR + DS arms was significant, indicating that DS inhibited the differentiation process. In the cytokeratin (CK) analysis as the indicator of cellular skeletal integrity, the percentage of antibody-positive cells was above the normal level in both experimental arms and significantly superior in the IR + DS arm.

Conclusion: The mucosal protective activity of DS, instead of stimulating proliferation, is based on prevention of cell loss by a combination of effects leading to the inhibition of cellular differentiation and an increase in the expression of epithelial mechanical strength between intercellular mechanical junctions.

Citing Articles

Does Photobiomodulation Affects CK10 and CK14 in Oral Mucositis Radioinduced Repair?.

Sardo A, Andrade M, Figueiredo A, Rosin F, Correa L, Zezell D Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(24).

PMID: 36555260 PMC: 9779304. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232415611.


A preclinical model to investigate normal tissue damage following fractionated radiotherapy to the head and neck.

Juvkam I, Zlygosteva O, Arous D, Galtung H, Malinen E, Soland T J Radiat Res. 2022; 64(1):44-52.

PMID: 36253091 PMC: 9855321. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrac066.


Increase in non-professional phagocytosis during the progression of cell cycle.

Hofmann A, Putz F, Buttner-Herold M, Hecht M, Fietkau R, Distel L PLoS One. 2021; 16(2):e0246402.

PMID: 33544774 PMC: 7864402. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246402.

References
1.
Hume W, Moore J . Sheet preparations of the stratum granulosum from mammalian skin and oral epithelium. J Anat. 1985; 140 ( Pt 4):669-78. PMC: 1165091. View

2.
Sonis S . Mucositis as a biological process: a new hypothesis for the development of chemotherapy-induced stomatotoxicity. Oral Oncol. 1998; 34(1):39-43. DOI: 10.1016/s1368-8375(97)00053-5. View

3.
Lalla R, Bowen J, Barasch A, Elting L, Epstein J, Keefe D . MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy. Cancer. 2014; 120(10):1453-61. PMC: 4164022. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28592. View

4.
Gibbs S, Ponec M . Intrinsic regulation of differentiation markers in human epidermis, hard palate and buccal mucosa. Arch Oral Biol. 2000; 45(2):149-58. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9969(99)00116-8. View

5.
Rodriguez-Caballero A, Torres-Lagares D, Robles-Garcia M, Pachon-Ibanez J, Gonzalez-Padilla D, Gutierrez-Perez J . Cancer treatment-induced oral mucositis: a critical review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 41(2):225-38. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2011.10.011. View