» Articles » PMID: 31693209

In Vivo Pelvic and Hip Joint Kinematics in Patients With Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Dual Fluoroscopy Study

Overview
Journal J Orthop Res
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Nov 7
PMID 31693209
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) may alter the kinematic function of the hip, resulting in pain and tissue damage. Previous motion analysis studies of FAIS have employed skin markers, which are prone to soft tissue artifact and inaccurate calculation of the hip joint center. This may explain why the evidence linking FAIS with deleterious kinematics is contradictory. The purpose of this study was to employ dual fluoroscopy (DF) to quantify in vivo kinematics of patients with cam FAIS relative to asymptomatic, morphologically normal control participants during various activities. Eleven asymptomatic, morphologically normal controls and seven patients with cam FAIS were imaged with DF during standing, level walking, incline walking, and functional range of motion activities. Model-based tracking calculated the kinematic position of the hip by registering projections of three-dimensional computed tomography models with DF images. Patients with FAIS stood with their hip extended (mean [95% confidence interval], -2.2 [-7.4, 3.1]°, flexion positive), whereas controls were flexed (5.3 [2.6, 8.0]°; p = 0.013). Male patients with cam FAIS had less peak internal rotation than the male control participants during self-selected speed level-walking (-0.2 [-6.5, 6.1]° vs. -9.8 [-12.2, -7.3]°; p = 0.007) and less anterior pelvic tilt at heel-strike of incline (5°) walking (3.4 [-1.0, -7.9]° vs. 9.8 [6.4, 13.2]°; p = 0.032). Even during submaximal range of motion activities, such as incline walking, patients may alter pelvic motion to avoid positions that approximate the cam lesion and the acetabular labrum. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 38:823-833, 2020.

Citing Articles

Simulated Cam Morphology of the Hip Changes Sacroiliac Motion During Hip Motion and Loading in a Cadaveric Model.

Uvodich M, Hooke A, Braig Z, Nieboer M, Dugdale E, Cross W Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2025; 6(6):100977.

PMID: 39776497 PMC: 11701934. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2024.100977.


Clinical presentation of anterior pelvic tilt and trunk muscle endurance among patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

Gonzalez-de-la-Flor A, Garcia-Arrabe M, Fernandez-Pardo T, Cotteret C Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024; 60(6):1027-1035.

PMID: 39374049 PMC: 11729730. DOI: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08378-3.


Sex-Based Differences and Asymmetry in Hip Kinematics During Unilateral Extension From Deep Hip Flexion.

Johnson C, Ruh E, Frankston N, Charles S, McClincy M, Anderst W J Biomech Eng. 2024; 146(12).

PMID: 39262043 PMC: 11500802. DOI: 10.1115/1.4066466.


Hip and Pelvis Movement Patterns in Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Differ From Controls and Change After Hip Arthroscopy During a Step-Down Pivot-Turn Task.

Alter T, Wichman D, Fenn T, Knapik D, Espinoza Orias A, Nho S Orthop J Sports Med. 2024; 12(2):23259671231169200.

PMID: 38361996 PMC: 10867405. DOI: 10.1177/23259671231169200.


A Smartphone App Shows Patients Return to Preoperative Gait Metrics 6 Weeks After Hip Arthroscopy, and Gait Metrics Have Low to Moderate Correlations With a Hip-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measure.

Allahabadi S, Fenn T, Larson J, Zhu D, Malloy P, Nho S Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2023; 5(5):100779.

PMID: 37680367 PMC: 10480538. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2023.100779.


References
1.
Lamontagne M, Kennedy M, Beaule P . The effect of cam FAI on hip and pelvic motion during maximum squat. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 467(3):645-50. PMC: 2635464. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0620-x. View

2.
Preece S, Willan P, Nester C, Graham-Smith P, Herrington L, Bowker P . Variation in pelvic morphology may prevent the identification of anterior pelvic tilt. J Man Manip Ther. 2009; 16(2):113-7. PMC: 2565125. DOI: 10.1179/106698108790818459. View

3.
Allen D, Beaule P, Ramadan O, Doucette S . Prevalence of associated deformities and hip pain in patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009; 91(5):589-94. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B5.22028. View

4.
Kapron A, Aoki S, Peters C, Anderson A . In-vivo hip arthrokinematics during supine clinical exams: Application to the study of femoroacetabular impingement. J Biomech. 2015; 48(11):2879-86. PMC: 4536131. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.04.022. View

5.
Kubiak-Langer M, Tannast M, MURPHY S, Siebenrock K, Langlotz F . Range of motion in anterior femoroacetabular impingement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007; 458:117-24. DOI: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318031c595. View