» Articles » PMID: 31689537

Optimizing the ICA-based Removal of Ocular EEG Artifacts from Free Viewing Experiments

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Nov 6
PMID 31689537
Citations 42
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Combining EEG with eye-tracking is a promising approach to study neural correlates of natural vision, but the resulting recordings are also heavily contaminated by activity of the eye balls, eye lids, and extraocular muscles. While Independent Component Analysis (ICA) is commonly used to suppress these ocular artifacts, its performance under free viewing conditions has not been systematically evaluated and many published reports contain residual artifacts. Here I evaluated and optimized ICA-based correction for two tasks with unconstrained eye movements: visual search in images and sentence reading. In a first step, four parameters of the ICA pipeline were varied orthogonally: the (1) high-pass and (2) low-pass filter applied to the training data, (3) the proportion of training data containing myogenic saccadic spike potentials (SP), and (4) the threshold for eye tracker-based component rejection. In a second step, the eye-tracker was used to objectively quantify the correction quality of each ICA solution, both in terms of undercorrection (residual artifacts) and overcorrection (removal of neurogenic activity). As a benchmark, results were compared to those obtained with an alternative spatial filter, Multiple Source Eye Correction (MSEC). With commonly used settings, Infomax ICA not only left artifacts in the data, but also distorted neurogenic activity during eye movement-free intervals. However, correction results could be strongly improved by training the ICA on optimally filtered data in which SPs were massively overweighted. With optimized procedures, ICA removed virtually all artifacts, including the SP and its associated spectral broadband artifact from both viewing paradigms, with little distortion of neural activity. It also outperformed MSEC in terms of SP correction. Matlab code is provided.

Citing Articles

How does Independent Component Analysis Preprocessing Affect EEG Microstates?.

Artoni F, Michel C Brain Topogr. 2025; 38(2):26.

PMID: 39904902 PMC: 11794336. DOI: 10.1007/s10548-024-01098-4.


Aging and word predictability during reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials.

Pagan A, Degno F, Milledge S, Kirkden R, White S, Liversedge S Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; 87(1):50-75.

PMID: 39875679 PMC: 11845442. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-02981-9.


Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Classification of Visual Stimulation-Induced EEG Signals in 2D and 3D VR Videos.

Zuo M, Chen X, Sui L Brain Sci. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851442 PMC: 11763735. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15010075.


Fixation-related potentials during a virtual navigation task: The influence of image statistics on early cortical processing.

Madison A, Callahan-Flintoft C, Thurman S, Hoffing R, Touryan J, Ries A Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025; 87(1):261-283.

PMID: 39849263 PMC: 11845547. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-024-03002-5.


Coregistration of eye movements and EEG reveals frequency effects of words and their constituent characters in natural silent Chinese reading.

Zeng T, Lou L, Liu Z, Chen C, Zhang Z Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):1830.

PMID: 39805886 PMC: 11730336. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-82817-6.