» Articles » PMID: 31673982

Global Implementation of Obesity Prevention Policies: a Review of Progress, Politics, and the Path Forward

Overview
Journal Curr Obes Rep
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2019 Nov 2
PMID 31673982
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: This review describes policy and regulatory strategies to prevent obesity and summarizes worldwide progress and impediments to scaling up strategies globally.

Recent Findings: While there is considerable variation in the breadth and depth of uptake of recommended strategies, the adoption of effective obesity prevention policies has been slow and inconsistent. There is broad consensus that strong government, corporate, and consumer actions, including regulatory measures, are needed to advance obesity prevention policies. Governments have lacked sufficient will to take necessary action, the food industry has actively worked to thwart policies to protect its commercial interests, and consumers have not exerted sufficient influence or demand to produce change. Advancing obesity prevention will require the use of effective strategies to shape and influence the information environments and political environments towards messages and actions to support public health. Greater emphasis is needed on reducing the influence of commercial interests, mobilizing civil society, and targeting vulnerable populations through equity-focused frameworks.

Citing Articles

Impact of out-of-home nutrition labelling on people with eating disorders: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Trompeter N, Duffy F, Peebles I, Wadhera E, Chambers K, Sharpe H BMJ Public Health. 2025; 3(1):e000862.

PMID: 40017917 PMC: 11816730. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000862.


Recognizing the ethical complexity of food policies and the role of the food industry.

Abdool Karim S, Alvarado M, Johnson T, Barnhill A Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(6).

PMID: 39607736 PMC: 11604071. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae168.


Neurocognitive factors predicting BMI changes from adolescence to young adulthood.

Reyes S, Peirano P, Gahagan S, Blanco E, Algarin C Obesity (Silver Spring). 2024; 32(4):768-777.

PMID: 38529547 PMC: 10965240. DOI: 10.1002/oby.23978.


Nutrition claims influence expectations about food attributes, attenuate activity in reward-associated brain regions during tasting, but do not impact pleasantness.

Rramani Q, Barakat Y, Jacob G, Ohla K, Lim S, Schicker D Brain Behav. 2022; 13(1):e2828.

PMID: 36511877 PMC: 9847625. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2828.


Trigeminal Stimulus Menthol Masks Bitter Off-Flavor of Artificial Sweetener Acesulfame-K.

Buchner K, Haagen J, Sastrosubroto A, Kerpes R, Freiherr J, Becker T Foods. 2022; 11(18).

PMID: 36140868 PMC: 9497717. DOI: 10.3390/foods11182734.


References
1.
Colchero M, Rivera-Dommarco J, Popkin B, Ng S . In Mexico, Evidence Of Sustained Consumer Response Two Years After Implementing A Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017; 36(3):564-571. PMC: 5442881. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1231. View

2.
Tamir O, Cohen-Yogev T, Furman-Assaf S, Endevelt R . Taxation of sugar sweetened beverages and unhealthy foods: a qualitative study of key opinion leaders' views. Isr J Health Policy Res. 2018; 7(1):43. PMC: 6069556. DOI: 10.1186/s13584-018-0240-1. View

3.
Sallis J, Glanz K . The role of built environments in physical activity, eating, and obesity in childhood. Future Child. 2006; 16(1):89-108. DOI: 10.1353/foc.2006.0009. View

4.
Backholer K, Sarink D, Beauchamp A, Keating C, Loh V, Ball K . The impact of a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages according to socio-economic position: a systematic review of the evidence. Public Health Nutr. 2016; 19(17):3070-3084. PMC: 10270974. DOI: 10.1017/S136898001600104X. View

5.
Samuels T, Unwin N . The 2007 Caribbean Community Port-of-Spain Declaration on noncommunicable diseases: an overview of a multidisciplinary evaluation. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2019; 42:e193. PMC: 6385896. DOI: 10.26633/RPSP.2018.193. View