» Articles » PMID: 30170610

Effective Advocacy Strategies for Influencing Government Nutrition Policy: a Conceptual Model

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2018 Sep 2
PMID 30170610
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Influencing public policy change can be difficult and complex, particularly for those with limited power and resources. For any one issue there may be several groups, including the commercial sector and public health advocates advocating from different policy perspectives. However, much of the public health advocacy literature and tools available for those wanting to improve their practice is based on research from one specific perspective of an issue. This approach deprives advocates of potential insight into the most effective levers for this complex and difficult process. To provide a more comprehensive insight into effective levers for influencing public health policy change, a conceptual model for poorly-resourced advocates was developed. The model was developed through the integration and synthesis of policy process and network theories with the results from three studies conducted previously by the authors: a systematic literature review; a social network analysis of influential actors in Australian nutrition policy; plus in-depth interviews with a sample of these actors who had diverse perspectives on influencing nutrition policy. Through understanding the key steps in this model advocates will be better equipped to increase political and public will, and affect positive policy change.

Citing Articles

Developing capacity in identifying cost-effective interventions to prevent and reduce obesity in China.

Jackson-Morris A, Chang S, Meyer C, Ma G Glob Health Action. 2025; 18(1):2463794.

PMID: 40062543 PMC: 11894739. DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2025.2463794.


Gender equality among medical and dental academic researchers in West Africa: a theoretical analysis of a compendium of research.

Folayan M, Gascon-Catalan A, Martinez-Perez G Front Oral Health. 2025; 6:1373404.

PMID: 40061254 PMC: 11885503. DOI: 10.3389/froh.2025.1373404.


Primary School Principals and Teachers Support School-Provided Meals in Queensland, Australia: Brief Report of a Cross-Sectional Study.

Esdaile E, Wharton L, Vidgen H, Gallegos D Health Promot J Austr. 2025; 36(2):e70015.

PMID: 39910962 PMC: 11799822. DOI: 10.1002/hpja.70015.


Australian Stakeholder Perspectives on Healthier Retail Food Environments for Toddlers-The Era of "Band Aids and Small Inroads".

McCann J, Woods J, Russell C Curr Dev Nutr. 2024; 8(1):102060.

PMID: 38269109 PMC: 10806265. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.102060.


Mapping the Lobbying Footprint of Harmful Industries: 23 Years of Data From OpenSecrets.

Chung H, Cullerton K, Lacy-Nichols J Milbank Q. 2024; 102(1):212-232.

PMID: 38219274 PMC: 10938928. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12686.


References
1.
Dorfman L, Wallack L . Moving nutrition upstream: the case for reframing obesity. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2007; 39(2 Suppl):S45-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2006.08.018. View

2.
Dodson E, Fleming C, Boehmer T, Haire-Joshu D, Luke D, Brownson R . Preventing childhood obesity through state policy: qualitative assessment of enablers and barriers. J Public Health Policy. 2009; 30 Suppl 1:S161-76. DOI: 10.1057/jphp.2008.57. View

3.
Brownell K, Warner K . The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food?. Milbank Q. 2009; 87(1):259-94. PMC: 2879177. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00555.x. View

4.
Freudenberg N, Bradley S, Serrano M . Public health campaigns to change industry practices that damage health: an analysis of 12 case studies. Health Educ Behav. 2007; 36(2):230-49. DOI: 10.1177/1090198107301330. View

5.
Eyler A, Nguyen L, Kong J, Yan Y, Brownson R . Patterns and predictors of enactment of state childhood obesity legislation in the United States: 2006-2009. Am J Public Health. 2012; 102(12):2294-302. PMC: 3519321. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300763. View