» Articles » PMID: 31673172

No Difference in Outcome of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with "Bone-patellar Tendon-bone Versus Semitendinosus-gracilis Graft with Preserved Insertion:" A Randomized Clinical Trial

Overview
Journal Indian J Orthop
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2019 Nov 2
PMID 31673172
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The type of graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is still a topic of debate and there is still no clear consensus on the ideal graft for ACL reconstruction.

Purpose: This study was conducted to compare the outcome of ACL reconstruction surgery between hamstring tendon graft and bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) graft.

Materials And Methods: One hundred and sixty professional athletes were enrolled in the study. They were divided into two groups by computerized randomization. In Group I, ACL reconstruction was done using BPTB graft, and in Group II, ACL reconstruction was done using semitendinosus gracilis graft with preserved tibial insertion (STGPI). Postoperatively, patients were assessed for knee stability, Lysholm score, and WOMAC score.

Results: Mean KT-1000 side-to-side difference at 1 year was 2.31 ± 1.68 mm in BPTB cohort and 2.52 ± 1.6 mm in STGPI cohort ( = 0.4); and at 2 years, it was 1.98 ± 1.62 mm in BPTB cohort and 2.23 ± 1.6 mm in STGPI cohort ( = 0.4). Mean Lysholm score at 2 years was 96.1 ± 5.81 in STGPI cohort and 97.3 ± 4.62 in BPTB cohort ( = 0.15). Mean WOMAC score at 2 years was 3.3 ± 2.76 in STGPI cohort and 2.84 ± 2.21 in BPTB cohort ( = 0.25). Graft rupture rate was 3.75%; 3 patients in each group had graft rupture. Kneeling pain was present in 15% (12/80) of patients with BPTB graft whereas none of the patients in STGPI cohort had kneeling pain.

Conclusion: There was no difference between two grafts in term of knee stability, visual analog scale score and functional outcome. However, hamstring tendon graft is associated with less donor site morbidity.

Citing Articles

Graft tunnel integration occurs early in the tibial tunnel compared with the femoral tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with preserved insertion hamstring tendon graft.

Gupta R, Singh S, Kapoor A, Soni A, Kaur R, Kaur N Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021; 33(1):37.

PMID: 34627401 PMC: 8501577. DOI: 10.1186/s43019-021-00119-x.


Return to Baseline Physical Activity After Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Bergeron J, Sercia Q, Drager J, Pelet S, Belzile E Am J Sports Med. 2021; 50(8):2292-2303.

PMID: 34310176 PMC: 9227950. DOI: 10.1177/03635465211017522.

References
1.
Roe J, Pinczewski L, Russell V, Salmon L, Kawamata T, Chew M . A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: differences and similarities. Am J Sports Med. 2005; 33(9):1337-45. DOI: 10.1177/0363546504274145. View

2.
Riaz O, Aqil A, Mannan A, Hossain F, Ali M, Chakrabarty G . Quadriceps Tendon-Bone or Patellar Tendon-Bone Autografts When Reconstructing the Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Meta-analysis. Clin J Sport Med. 2017; 28(3):316-324. DOI: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000451. View

3.
Pinczewski L, Lyman J, Salmon L, Russell V, Roe J, Linklater J . A 10-year comparison of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with hamstring tendon and patellar tendon autograft: a controlled, prospective trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(4):564-74. DOI: 10.1177/0363546506296042. View

4.
Kartus J, Movin T, Karlsson J . Donor-site morbidity and anterior knee problems after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autografts. Arthroscopy. 2001; 17(9):971-80. DOI: 10.1053/jars.2001.28979. View

5.
Bizzini M, Gorelick M, Munzinger U, Drobny T . Joint laxity and isokinetic thigh muscle strength characteristics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone patellar tendon bone versus quadrupled hamstring autografts. Clin J Sport Med. 2005; 16(1):4-9. DOI: 10.1097/01.jsm.0000188040.97135.43. View